Was Apollo 11 landing staged? Rumors about US mission resurface in China

[ChineseTiger1986]

SpaceX has a real product, and both Starship and Super Heavy are proven to be reusable.

China has proven nothing, and is essentially vaporware today.

The Space X is only good at reusable rocket, but it has proven little or none capability in the deep space exploration.

Sorry to burst your bubble, Starship & Falcon Heavy are only suitable for low-orbital payload.

The Starship needs more than dozen of refuel in order to reach moon, so to send human onto mars will remain as a pipe dream for Starship.

China will 100% extract the sample from mars before 2035, and trying to reach that goal first before boasting about the manned mission on mars.

 

[F-22Raptor]

The year of 2030 is very near, and we will quickly find out who will become the space champion for the mankind.

NASA will almost certainly have landed humans back on the Moon by 2030.

China has flight tested almost nothing of what it will need to land humans on the Moon and it’s almost 2025. I highly doubt China will make a 2030 timeline.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

But if you are going to use that perspective your Long March 10 is complete vaporware.

How can you be saying you are in better shape??

The Long March 10 is progressing steadily, and it is better to build a solid foundation than rushed like no tomorrow.



Unlike Artemis I which was discovered with full of glitches, and I highly doubt that your Artemis II mission could be done smoothly with the configuration like that.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/05/02/artemis-orion-caapsule-damage/

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

The Long March 10 is progressing steadily, and it is better to build a solid foundation than rushed like no tomorrow.



Unlike Artemis I which was discovered with full of glitches, and I highly doubt that your Artemis II mission could be done smoothly with the configuration like that.

Again you are comparing SLS to basically vaporware.

The SLS rocket sent a man capable capsule all the way around the moon and back and yours has not been able to show anything.

BTW note how the Long March 10 version sending payloads to the moon is also like SLS in not being reusable.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

NASA will almost certainly have landed humans back on the Moon by 2030.

China has flight tested almost nothing of what it will need to land humans on the Moon and it’s almost 2025. I highly doubt China will make a 2030 timeline.

China has performed two sample return mission from moon, it was basically two mini re-entry for the future manned mission.

You need to achieve this feat before bragging how great is your mega rocket that is potentially the giant firecrackers on the space and can barely reach the low orbit.

 

[F-22Raptor]

The Space X is only good at reusable rocket, but it has proven little or none capability in the deep space exploration.

Sorry to burst your bubble, Starship & Falcon Heavy are only suitable for low-orbital payload.

The Starship needs more than dozen of refuel in order to reach moon, so to send human onto mars will remain as a pipe dream for Starship.

China will 100% extract the sample from mars before 2035, and trying to reach that goal first before boasting about the manned mission on mars.

Starship to Starship propellant transfer testing is set to begin early next year. SpaceX already has several Starships and Super Heavy’s ready for following flights and Starfactory is opening several hundred thousand more feet of space this summer for mass production of Starship Super Heavy stacks.

China has nothing but vaporware at this point with no major flight testing completed.

 

[F-22Raptor]

China has performed two sample return mission from moon, it was basically two mini re-entry for the future manned mission.

You need to achieve this feat before bragging how great is your mega rocket that is potentially the giant firecrackers on the space and can barely reach the low orbit.

Moon sample returns of less than 10 pounds has nothing to do with a human rated spacecraft for Moon missions.

China has performed no major flight testing for human moon landing missions.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

No, few Chinese living in China doubt the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings. But many of those Chinese living in the US doubt the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings.

In fact, far more Americans than Chinese doubt the authenticity of the Apollo moon landings.

The prevailing view among the Chinese is that it does not matter whether the Apollo landings were real or not, but whether the United States now has the capability to land on the moon.

Yep, compared to Chang'e 6, the lunar lander of Apollo looked like a very fake mockup from a movie studio.

However, we don't want to waste time to discuss a historical event from 50-60 years ago was real or fake, because China to build a permanent lunar base is what matter the most, it will affect the future of humanity as a real milestone, and a starting point for humanity to colonize the solar system.

 

[神威98]

Yep, compared to Chang'e 6, the lunar lander of Apollo looked like a very fake mockup from a movie studio.

However, we don't want to waste time to discuss a historical event from 50-60 years ago was real or fake, because China to build a permanent lunar base is what matter the most, it will affect the future of humanity as a real milestone, and a starting point for humanity to colonize the solar system.

View attachment 53521

View attachment 53522

Muahahaha. Whoa look that soil impression!! A moon lander designed to carry humans weighs a fukk tonne more than one designed to carry a soil sampler...

I don't know if anyone ever played the original Duke Nukem 3D DOS game (which is a fully Zionist developed, scripted and promoted PC game). There's a scene where they depict (filming) lunar activities inside a movie studio. When you walk past that part of the game, you automatically go "so that's how it was! That's how you Zionists did it!"

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Muahahaha. Whoa look that soil impression!! A moon lander designed to carry humans weighs a fukk tonne more than one designed to carry a soil sampler...

I don't know if anyone ever played the original Duke Nukem 3D DOS game. There's a scene where they depict (filming) lunar activities inside a movie studio. When you walk past that part of the game, you automatically go "so that's how it was!"

Yep, the bracket of Chang'e 6 looked full of technological might that was deeply embedded into the rocky surface of the moon, yet the Apollo lunar lander that was supposed to weigh twice more than Chang'e 6 looked like a cheap mockup that seemed to be afloat on a muddy ground.

Maybe they were landing on two different moons, who knows.

 

[F-22Raptor]

The first lunar space station habitat module is now undergoing stress testing

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Yep, compared to Chang'e 6, the lunar lander of Apollo looked like a very fake mockup from a movie studio.

However, we don't want to waste time to discuss a historical event from 50-60 years ago was real or fake, because China to build a permanent lunar base is what matter the most, it will affect the future of humanity as a real milestone, and a starting point for humanity to colonize the solar system.

View attachment 53521

View attachment 53522

That's the landing probe bent over..you can see them in this pic

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

That's the landing probe bent over..you can see them in this pic

View attachment 53529

Sure, the 1960s transmission/communication technology looked more fluid than 5G/6G from nowadays.

The Apollo moon manned mission looked far more sophisticated compared to the Artemis one.

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Sure, the 1960s transmission/communication technology looked more fluid than 5G/6G from nowadays.

The Apollo moon manned mission looked far more sophisticated compared to the Artemis one.

LOL! Are you going to just endlessly jump to new topics as each one of your suspicions gets explained...

You took a nice shot with that pic with the stick but you blew it...nice try though.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

LOL! Are you going to just endlessly jump to new topics as each one of your suspicions gets explained...

You took a nice shot with that pic with the stick but you blew it...nice try though.

Dude, I know that I got your nerves.

By the year 2030, it is possible that 8 billion people on Earth will witness the moon landing mission by two different countries with slightly different methods.

Chang'e 5 & 6 were already China's technological demonstrator for the impending manned lunar mission. I also saw the footage of Artemis 1 mission.

I don't think the modern manned lunar mission will remotely resemble the Apollo mission, nor it will generate so many movie-like footages.

However, the Apollo mission is irrelevant right now, nor it will affect the humanity's future exploration on the celestial bodies of the solar system.

China is on its own footing, and we will have a permanent lunar base that will eventually turn into a factory to build the future giant spaceships with nuclear fusion drive.