Western grand strategy in countering Iran's Islamic revolution

muhammed45

Elite Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
13,173
Reaction score
22,594
Reputation
2,866.5
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
The Role of Wahhabism and Fabricated Revolutions in Countering the Iranian Revolution

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, the global balance of power shifted dramatically. Iran emerged as an independent, anti-imperialist power, presenting a new model of governance in the Islamic world that directly challenged the strategic interests of the West (primarily the U.S. and its allies).

To counter this, the West and its regional allies adopted a dual strategy: 1) Strengthening extremist religious movements (Takfiri/Wahhabi) and 2) Supporting proxy wars to drain the resources of Shiite or anti-Western Sunni leaders/nations.

1. Syria: From Civil Unrest to Takfiri Warfare
Syria stands as one of the most prominent examples of a "manufactured transition."
The Transformation: What began as civil protests in 2011 was rapidly transformed into a war of attrition through logistical, military, and financial support from Western powers and regional actors.
The Role of Wahhabi/Salafi Currents: To counter the "Axis of Resistance" and the government of Bashar al-Assad, extremist Takfiri groups were used as "shock troops" on the battlefield. The goal was to use religious extremism to distract the state from its political and strategic priorities.
Strategic Objective: To weaken Syria as a regional player and sever Iran's strategic corridors leading to the Mediterranean.

2. Promoting Wahhabism as a Tool of "Soft War"
After the Iranian Revolution, Western powers realized they could not easily combat revolutionary Islamic models through purely secular means. Instead, they utilized religious currents to counter "Revolutionary Islam":
Replacing the Narrative: Revolutionary, anti-Western Islamic political models were countered by "traditionalist/statist" Islam (Wahhabism). Wahhabism, with its emphasis on 'Takfir' (declaring others infidels), created an environment where any political movement challenging the existing status quo could be labeled as "apostate."
Financing: Massive amounts of capital from Gulf institutions were funneled into schools and mosques in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, and parts of Africa to prevent the spread of revolutionary ideologies.

3. The "Takfiri Belt": Saudi Arabia and Pakistan
During and after the Cold War, cooperation between Western powers and countries with Wahhabi ideologies (like Saudi Arabia) and traditional military structures (like Pakistan) created a belt of paramilitary groups.
Afghanistan: The rise of groups that later became Al-Qaeda was the result of projects designed to counter Soviet influence (and later, to control other Islamic movements). These groups consistently utilized Wahhabi ideology to recruit fighters.

Summary: The Western Strategy against Iran
To summarize, the West has used "fabricated revolutions" or "managed upheavals" through the following methodology:
1. Exploiting Sectarian Divides (Fitna): Using religious differences (Sunni-Shiite) to break Islamic unity against foreign intervention.
2. Utilizing Wahhabi/Salafi Currents: These movements serve as ideal "tools" because their extremist nature allows them to dismantle any independent Islamic political structure that refuses to comply with Western interests.
3. Proxy Warfare: Instead of direct confrontation with Iran, the West has triggered chaos in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen to trap Iran in exhausting, costly, and endless conflicts, thereby depleting its economic and military strength.
 
Source:
Multiple
  • “Western intervention in Middle Eastern politics”
  • “The impact of Wahhabism on regional stability”
  • “Geopolitics of the Syrian Civil War”
  • “US foreign policy and regime change in the Middle East”
  • “Sectarianization as a political strategy”
 
The Transformation of Pakistan: From Jinnah’s Vision to a Wahhabi Proxy State

The political and social evolution of Pakistan represents one of the most significant shifts in the modern Islamic world. Once envisioned as a progressive sanctuary for Muslims in South Asia, the state underwent a fundamental metamorphosis, transitioning from a constitutional democracy rooted in inclusive Islamic principles to a centralized, puritanical state serving the geopolitical interests of the Saudi Arabian monarchy.

1. The Stolen Legacy: The Hijacking of Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s Vision
To understand the magnitude of this shift, one must first address the "theft" of the founding ideology. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader), envisioned Pakistan not as a narrow theocratic state, but as a laboratory for Islamic democratic values. His vision was characterized by:
Pluralism and Protection: Jinnah’s August 11, 1947, speech emphasized that religion was a personal matter and that all citizens, regardless of faith, were equal stakeholders in the state.
Modernity and Law: He intended for Pakistan to be a modern state where Islamic ethics would inform social justice, rather than a state governed by medieval interpretations of law.

This vision was systematically dismantled. Western powers, seeking a stable but compliant bulwark against Soviet expansion and later Indian influence, found Jinnah’s democratic constitutionalism inconvenient. By supporting reactionary religious elements over secular democratic institutions, the West paved the way for the eventual "hijacking" of the state's identity.

2. The Catalyst of Transformation: The Era of General Zia-ul-Haq
If Jinnah provided the blueprint for a modern Islamic state, General Zia-ul-Haq provided the blueprint for a radicalized one. His decade-long rule (1977–1988) remains the most consequential period in Pakistan's history regarding its religious identity.

The Mechanism of "Islamization":
Zia did not merely introduce religion into politics; he used religion to legitimize military autocracy. Through a process known as Islamization, he implemented:
The Hudood Ordinances: Replacing civil laws with harsh, medieval-style corporal punishments, which served to control the population and marginalize women and minorities.
Blasphemy Laws: These were expanded and weaponized, creating a tool for social control and sectarian persecution.
The Role of the Ulama: Zia institutionalized the clergy into the state apparatus, giving them veto power over legislation through the Council of Islamic Ideology.

3. The Wahhabi Pivot: Pakistan as a Geopolitical Proxy
The transformation was not merely domestic; it was a strategic realignment. During the Soviet-Afghan War, Pakistan became the frontline of the "Global Jihad." This era saw a massive influx of petrodollars from Saudi Arabia, which were used to fund the Madrasa system.

The Saudi-Wahhabi Influence:
Institutionalization of Salafism: Under the guise of fighting communism, the state allowed for the rapid proliferation of Deobandi and Wahhabi-influenced seminaries. These institutions replaced the more traditional, Sufi-oriented, and localized Islamic practices of South Asia with a rigid, puritanical, and transnational version of Islam.
Sectarianization: This period saw the birth of violent sectarianism. The state, once a protector of all Muslims, became a facilitator for extremist ideologies that viewed any deviation from the Wahhabi-influenced orthodoxy as apostasy.
Service to the Monarchy: Pakistan’s foreign policy shifted to align almost entirely with the Saudi-led bloc. This turned Pakistan into a strategic depth provider for Saudi interests, exchanging its ideological and military sovereignty for financial stability and regional legitimacy.

Conclusion: The Result of the Engineered Shift
The result of this multi-layered process—the Western undermining of Jinnah’s democratic foundations, the military coup of Zia-ul-Haq, and the financial infusion of Wahhabi ideology—is a Pakistan that is qualitatively different from its founding premise. The country transitioned from a state seeking to prove that Islam and modernity could coexist, to a state where religious extremism is often used as a tool for political survival and regional proxy warfare. The "hijacking" of the Islamic identity by autocratic and foreign-funded interests has left a legacy of instability that the nation continues to grapple with today.
 
It was not an Islamic revolution , it was a Shia revolution or better call it devolution.... revolutions bring new thoughts and idea , Iranian shit show brought nothing new to the table... nobody would have given a damn about this shit show had you not tried to export it to other countries.... chanting death to America , holding American diplomats hostage against all the norms of international law and mortality....now that you are at the recieving end of your hubris you talk about Islamic unity....wahabi / takfiris are as good or as bad as Shias , I don't see much difference between them.
 
The Transformation of Pakistan: From Jinnah’s Vision to a Wahhabi Proxy State

The political and social evolution of Pakistan represents one of the most significant shifts in the modern Islamic world. Once envisioned as a progressive sanctuary for Muslims in South Asia, the state underwent a fundamental metamorphosis, transitioning from a constitutional democracy rooted in inclusive Islamic principles to a centralized, puritanical state serving the geopolitical interests of the Saudi Arabian monarchy.

1. The Stolen Legacy: The Hijacking of Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s Vision
To understand the magnitude of this shift, one must first address the "theft" of the founding ideology. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Quaid-e-Azam (Great Leader), envisioned Pakistan not as a narrow theocratic state, but as a laboratory for Islamic democratic values. His vision was characterized by:
Pluralism and Protection: Jinnah’s August 11, 1947, speech emphasized that religion was a personal matter and that all citizens, regardless of faith, were equal stakeholders in the state.
Modernity and Law: He intended for Pakistan to be a modern state where Islamic ethics would inform social justice, rather than a state governed by medieval interpretations of law.

This vision was systematically dismantled. Western powers, seeking a stable but compliant bulwark against Soviet expansion and later Indian influence, found Jinnah’s democratic constitutionalism inconvenient. By supporting reactionary religious elements over secular democratic institutions, the West paved the way for the eventual "hijacking" of the state's identity.

2. The Catalyst of Transformation: The Era of General Zia-ul-Haq
If Jinnah provided the blueprint for a modern Islamic state, General Zia-ul-Haq provided the blueprint for a radicalized one. His decade-long rule (1977–1988) remains the most consequential period in Pakistan's history regarding its religious identity.

The Mechanism of "Islamization":
Zia did not merely introduce religion into politics; he used religion to legitimize military autocracy. Through a process known as Islamization, he implemented:
The Hudood Ordinances: Replacing civil laws with harsh, medieval-style corporal punishments, which served to control the population and marginalize women and minorities.
Blasphemy Laws: These were expanded and weaponized, creating a tool for social control and sectarian persecution.
The Role of the Ulama: Zia institutionalized the clergy into the state apparatus, giving them veto power over legislation through the Council of Islamic Ideology.

3. The Wahhabi Pivot: Pakistan as a Geopolitical Proxy
The transformation was not merely domestic; it was a strategic realignment. During the Soviet-Afghan War, Pakistan became the frontline of the "Global Jihad." This era saw a massive influx of petrodollars from Saudi Arabia, which were used to fund the Madrasa system.

The Saudi-Wahhabi Influence:
Institutionalization of Salafism: Under the guise of fighting communism, the state allowed for the rapid proliferation of Deobandi and Wahhabi-influenced seminaries. These institutions replaced the more traditional, Sufi-oriented, and localized Islamic practices of South Asia with a rigid, puritanical, and transnational version of Islam.
Sectarianization: This period saw the birth of violent sectarianism. The state, once a protector of all Muslims, became a facilitator for extremist ideologies that viewed any deviation from the Wahhabi-influenced orthodoxy as apostasy.
Service to the Monarchy: Pakistan’s foreign policy shifted to align almost entirely with the Saudi-led bloc. This turned Pakistan into a strategic depth provider for Saudi interests, exchanging its ideological and military sovereignty for financial stability and regional legitimacy.

Conclusion: The Result of the Engineered Shift
The result of this multi-layered process—the Western undermining of Jinnah’s democratic foundations, the military coup of Zia-ul-Haq, and the financial infusion of Wahhabi ideology—is a Pakistan that is qualitatively different from its founding premise. The country transitioned from a state seeking to prove that Islam and modernity could coexist, to a state where religious extremism is often used as a tool for political survival and regional proxy warfare. The "hijacking" of the Islamic identity by autocratic and foreign-funded interests has left a legacy of instability that the nation continues to grapple with today.
1. Ayesha Jalal, The Sole Spokesman: Jinnah, the Muslim League and the Demand for Pakistan
2. Stanley Wolpert, Jinnah of Pakistan
3. Lawrence Ziring, Islamization and the State: Pakistan in the Era of Zia-ul-Haq
4. Christophe Jaffrelot, The Pakistan Paradox: Instability and Resilience in an Islamic State
5. Eqbal Ahmad, The Making of Post-Colonial States
6. Faisal Devji, The Islamization of South Asia
7. Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah
8. Aqil Shah, The Struggle for Pakistan: Institutional Fragility and Democratic Deficits
9. Ahmed Rashid, Taliban: Militant Islam, Afghanistan, and the New Great War
10. Steve Coll, Ghost Wars
 
It was not an Islamic revolution , it was a Shia revolution or better call it devolution.... revolutions bring new thoughts and idea , Iranian shit show brought nothing new to the table... nobody would have given a damn about this shit show had you not tried to export it to other countries.... chanting death to America , holding American diplomats hostage against all the norms of international law and mortality....now that you are at the recieving end of your hubris you talk about Islamic unity....wahabi / takfiris are as good or as bad as Shias , I don't see much difference between them.
You are entitled to your opinion my friend, please try to build a foundation for your claims and open a way for discussion. What you type is a one way road to your own maybe personal agenda.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top