Who is we @ fatman

[313Ghazi]

We is the members of the forum.

Yes "we" don't admin the content, but "we" do have the right to express an opinion.

This current method I find lame.

Others might not.

I think it reminds ME of the old pakdef forum where you could barely see any sign of life.

I suspect the volume of posts have likely reduced due to this format, I have certainly reduced my engagement because it is difficult to see any new content I want to engage in.

In other forums I frequent THEY add threadmarks to the top of the list which act like bookmarks signposting to significant news.

I don't know why YOU are so offended.

 

[SoulSpokesman]

@313Ghazi

Ghazi sb,

What happened?

Regards

 

[Watandar]

Don't you use the Latest Posts feature?

 

[Jango]

Just the kind of content I need on my day off.

 

[Musings]

We is the members of the forum.

Yes "we" don't admin the content, but "we" do have the right to express an opinion.

This current method I find lame.

Others might not.

I think it reminds ME of the old pakdef forum where you could barely see any sign of life.

I suspect the volume of posts have likely reduced due to this format, I have certainly reduced my engagement because it is difficult to see any new content I want to engage in.

In other forums I frequent THEY add threadmarks to the top of the list which act like bookmarks signposting to significant news.

I don't know why YOU are so offended.

@Mr X could do with your input?

 

[PakAl]

We is the members of the forum.

Yes "we" don't admin the content, but "we" do have the right to express an opinion.

This current method I find lame.

Others might not.

I think it reminds ME of the old pakdef forum where you could barely see any sign of life.

I suspect the volume of posts have likely reduced due to this format, I have certainly reduced my engagement because it is difficult to see any new content I want to engage in.

In other forums I frequent THEY add threadmarks to the top of the list which act like bookmarks signposting to significant news.

I don't know why YOU are so offended.

I use mobile and see a latest post feed, so I know exactly where people are engaged in and hot topics.

 

[maxpane]

THIS IS LESS DEFENCE FPRUM MORE AUNTIYUN KI LARAI

 

[Watandar]

I use mobile and see a latest post feed, so I know exactly where people are engaged in and hot topics.

View attachment 204396

Yeah I use same feature.

 

[313Ghazi]

Look im not complaining and I might be the only one...

But if I see latest posts on something with 100+ pages, I wonder...

1. Is it 2 guys randomly arguing about something off topic or insulting each other

2. Is there an actual update worth reading about?

I'll give you an example... I clicked on the army one and saw a new mobile mortar system in a tweet. That was cool, that I want to see.

I clicked on PTI news and it's just guys bickering. No actual news.

When we used to create new topics for all new news, it would be easier for me to tell what was bickering and what was news.

Although I see why you don't always want a new topic for everything, but sometimes it warrants it right?

Biggest example I can think of is when ISPR did a press conference and announced all these new amazing hi tech weapons systems.

It was buried in one of the big threads. Unless you click on them to see - you don't know it happened.

 

[313Ghazi]

Again @Fatman17 brother it's nothing personal and idk why you came across so trigger happy on my other one in the suggestions thread but it was NEVER my intention to offend.

As someone who moderated a previous version of PDF I know it's thankless unpaid work.

 

[PakAl]

Look im not complaining and I might be the only one...

But if I see latest posts on something with 100+ pages, I wonder...

1. Is it 2 guys randomly arguing about something off topic or insulting each other

2. Is there an actual update worth reading about?

I'll give you an example... I clicked on the army one and saw a new mobile mortar system in a tweet. That was cool, that I want to see.

I clicked on PTI news and it's just guys bickering. No actual news.

When we used to create new topics for all new news, it would be easier for me to tell what was bickering and what was news.

Although I see why you don't always want a new topic for everything, but sometimes it warrants it right?

Biggest example I can think of is when ISPR did a press conference and announced all these new amazing hi tech weapons systems.

It was buried in one of the big threads. Unless you click on them to see - you don't know it happened.

I understand what you mean, some important topics may need new threads and people do create them. I created AJK elections thread, not many people are interested and soon it will disappear but demand is also needed, GB elections was the same.

What I normally do is follow my favourite topics, I keep going to submarines, J35, Rocket force, Iran war etc threads then follow up the updates, creating new threads for every news will end up with 1000s of different threads.