Yemen Civil War News and Discussion.. an evolving situation

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
the question is whether multiple B-2s can reach all these sites deep inside Iran
A big question.
You have strange ideas about this bomb.
You cannot damage a depth of 120 meters by hitting two bombs.
After the explosion of each bomb, new soil and rocks are created.
This is not correct because there would be a crater left open by the previous explosion, when the bombs detonate, the shock waves propagate through the dense medium, undermining the foundations of the structure and causing it to collapse. Even if a first bomb fails to collapse the bunker, subsequent bombs could have the ability to penetrate even deeper and explode in the closest part of the concrete or even bypass the concrete, depending on how successful the previous attack was.

This all depends on the attack configuration and accuracy. Furthermore, this is why there is a delay of seconds after the next bomb explodes. When multiple bombs are used in quick succession, the pressure and impact can increase the probability of penetrating deeper structures. Furthermore, coordinated attacks can overcome the target's defenses and increase the damage potential.

When it comes to bunkers hundreds of meters deep, the best method is to use a B61-11, which can carry a nuclear charge with a yield between 1 kiloton (1,000 tons of TNT) and 300 kilotons. The shockwave from such an intense underground explosion would cause damage deep underground and would presumably destroy even the most heavily fortified bunker. The problem is that it is really difficult for even nuclear-charged bombs to do this.

The problem with the strategy of a two or more B-2 line-up is that it would take more bombs to do the same job as one nuclear-charged bomb. Another problem is the enormous amount of radioactive fallout in the air from the open crater.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

So we can understand this as a demonstration to Iran if this is indeed correct.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The US can produce 6-8 MOPs per month
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The US can produce 6-8 MOPs per month



I am sure it this massive bomb would "glow brightly" on radar and so be relatively easy to destroy by air defence interceptor missiles.
 

Live US Bombers Attack Key Houthi Targets And Destroys Weapon Depots | Houthi Latest News | N18G​


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The US can produce 6-8 MOPs per month

Do you know how many missiles Iran produces in a month?
If you knew, you would understand that all American soldiers, bases and ships in Middle East will be easily destroyed by Iran.
 
A big question.

This is not correct because there would be a crater left open by the previous explosion, when the bombs detonate, the shock waves propagate through the dense medium, undermining the foundations of the structure and causing it to collapse. Even if a first bomb fails to collapse the bunker, subsequent bombs could have the ability to penetrate even deeper and explode in the closest part of the concrete or even bypass the concrete, depending on how successful the previous attack was.

This all depends on the attack configuration and accuracy. Furthermore, this is why there is a delay of seconds after the next bomb explodes. When multiple bombs are used in quick succession, the pressure and impact can increase the probability of penetrating deeper structures. Furthermore, coordinated attacks can overcome the target's defenses and increase the damage potential.

When it comes to bunkers hundreds of meters deep, the best method is to use a B61-11, which can carry a nuclear charge with a yield between 1 kiloton (1,000 tons of TNT) and 300 kilotons. The shockwave from such an intense underground explosion would cause damage deep underground and would presumably destroy even the most heavily fortified bunker. The problem is that it is really difficult for even nuclear-charged bombs to do this.

The problem with the strategy of a two or more B-2 line-up is that it would take more bombs to do the same job as one nuclear-charged bomb. Another problem is the enormous amount of radioactive fallout in the air from the open crater.


So we can understand this as a demonstration to Iran if this is indeed correct.
Crater left after Hassan Nasrallah's bombing campaign:

1729237847324.png
 
:love:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top