Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You know Askari Guards ? The security guard agency.Honestly Pakistan would have been better off without Marines. They are pretty much like Rangers for coastal area. That budget should have used for producing millions of beach coastal obstacles. And use drones to monitor and position rockets and artys.
View attachment 156520
if you say it that way, what's really keeping the future conflict(s) from going to a "MAD" type scenario anyway once things are exhausted or we start sort of losing any advantage over them ?? Something tells me the escalation ladder will be very short and will be toppled quickly leading to nuclear strikes by both on each other.....is that what we r expecting?At the end of the day - the enemy is well aware of how hollow Pakistan's actual defenses are.
However, they are also aware of how hollow their spears are or even if they have solid spears cannot find enough people to hold it together. Whenever they change that - the "hold it together" part - I keep saying is the day you all should prepare for a bloodbath.
Take a look at 71, study it again and again to see what supposed "brilliance" India did.
Nothing. They just followed a plan methodically. Their leaders also know they did not need heroics or 6 kill aces, they just needed everyone to be just about - just exactly - proficient at their specific task AND NOTHING ELSE.
They mostly wiped the floor with your Army and Navy - and your Airforce survived only because it was asked to sit out the conflict and protect itself for a never to come offensive( other than the spirited actions of 33d Wing at Monabao which saved you being cut in half)
Otherwise find any other example of "Brilliance" or even "competence" by many of the leadership in your branches. Keep this nonsense of Battle hardened religious ideals to fantasies - those religious ideals have killed more Pakistanis than any of the Hindutva could ever dream of and continue to do so.
Back in Kargil your PN officers were begging doctors to be declared medically unfit so they would not go out for certain death. Things are MUCH MUCH Better now.
However, if it is already to the point where IA's Amphibious brigades can safely land troops, the conflict is lost.
The first step of that process is to repatriate every afghan refugee from the country and those who illegally obtained CNICs. Illegal afghans are a security risk, as they provide humint on army's movement and are actively involved in undermining our state's integrity. After reading tweets of afghans and their diaspora since last two weeks, i feel like we'll be really better of by making sure we don't bring any afghans into pakistan.We must really work on force protection and vital installation security in the coming weeks and months. The Enemy will most likely seek to target critical infrastructure, assets and personnel via its proxies ahead of any major conflict.
i just never understood why those assholes even want to come to Pak and/or stay here, they know we don't like them and they don't like us yet they want to come here so badly. Then they go into all parts of the country and not just stay in kpk even knowing they dont speak urduThe first step of that process is to repatriate every afghan refugee from the country and those who illegally obtained CNICs. Illegal afghans are a security risk, as they provide humint on army's movement and are actively involved in undermining our state's integrity. After reading tweets of afghans and their diaspora since last two weeks, i feel like we'll be really better of by making sure we don't bring any afghans into pakistan.
Lol. Too late I reckon
I guess the Chambh Jhaurian corridor is still with India after 1971 and INS Kukhri is still afloat .At the end of the day - the enemy is well aware of how hollow Pakistan's actual defenses are.
However, they are also aware of how hollow their spears are or even if they have solid spears cannot find enough people to hold it together. Whenever they change that - the "hold it together" part - I keep saying is the day you all should prepare for a bloodbath.
Take a look at 71, study it again and again to see what supposed "brilliance" India did.
Nothing. They just followed a plan methodically. Their leaders also know they did not need heroics or 6 kill aces, they just needed everyone to be just about - just exactly - proficient at their specific task AND NOTHING ELSE.
They mostly wiped the floor with your Army and Navy - and your Airforce survived only because it was asked to sit out the conflict and protect itself for a never to come offensive( other than the spirited actions of 33d Wing at Monabao which saved you being cut in half)
Otherwise find any other example of "Brilliance" or even "competence" by many of the leadership in your branches. Keep this nonsense of Battle hardened religious ideals to fantasies - those religious ideals have killed more Pakistanis than any of the Hindutva could ever dream of and continue to do so.
Back in Kargil your PN officers were begging doctors to be declared medically unfit so they would not go out for certain death. Things are MUCH MUCH Better now.
However, if it is already to the point where IA's Amphibious brigades can safely land troops, the conflict is lost.
if you say it that way, what's really keeping the future conflict(s) from going to a "MAD" type scenario anyway once things are exhausted or we start sort of losing any advantage over them ?? Something tells me the escalation ladder will be very short and will be toppled quickly leading to nuclear strikes by both on each other.....is that what we r expecting?
ww3/armagaeddon/malhama tul uzma ??
The world already has too many nuclear flashpoints, this is just 1 of them
India is looking to shift Sir Creek border by around 96kms, which will get important oil reserves and fishing areas into their maritime boundaries. Its not the dead marshes of Sir Creek, but the associated Maritime region in the sea that it wants. The question from India's POV, is that will Pakistan strategic retreat, in order to avoid escalation to nuclear levels, or will Pakistan go all in for a 90 Km disputed area ? They are hoping for the former.
India, even if unable to "capture", will be able to say that they cleared the place (as Pakistan has lots of defensive and hard structures in the place for strong defense) ... India will get bragging rights and one of the largest fishing areas in the region and will lose the humiliation of May.
Though Pakistan can keep going at this for a long time if it wants. That area does not offer any benefits to tactically larger side, so India will still have a very hard time with no guarantees of success, but it will be a long, bloody limited war until one side backs off.
That it will be decision of which side strategically retreats from the 96Km disputed area of Sir Creek, this will not be a shoot planes and throw missiles and go home war .. this one will only end when one side strategically retreats or otherwise escalates.i am not sure what are u trying to say here
There are multiple areas where amphibious operations can be conducted, its not restricted to one area only.Sit Creek is not meant for armour
Pc game sir.I will buy your game when it's ready. Please tag me. For Android?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.