Pakistan Constitutional Amendments:
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
Xestan
Trusted Member
I cannot argue with cultist. Logic left you guys when Taliban Khan was ousted. Keep crying!
Pakistanithinktank
Registered Member
On top of that — army cultists and boot lickers are actually gonna support this in their Bughaz-e-Imran!
Imran Khan’s political relevance has diminished, as the establishment appears poised to formalize martial law under the guise of legitimacy. The IMF cycle persists, and the burden of excessive taxation continues to fall on the public sustaining the privileges of the elite class….
PakFactor
Elite Member
That's not a logical response to the question asked, but rather a reply from someone afraid to admit the real truth.
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
How come? He is Pakistan’s only genuine political force left after all the others have already done Baiat of Hazrat Asim Muneer.
Xestan
Trusted Member
Your response to my post was without any proof and substance. I logged into this forum to talk about operational aspects of these changes, not to listen to whining of cult brigade. Please carry on!
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
Same here. I logged into this forum to talk about constitutional aspects of these changes, not to listen to whining of boot licking brigade.
Xestan
Trusted Member
Same here. I logged into this forum to talk about constitutional aspects of these changes, not to listen to whining of boot licking brigade.
So, tell me what have you added so far to the conversation. I'd like to read your analysis. For the cult, everyone disagreeing is bootlicker, because the former bootlickers just can't see anyone else in their previous full time job.
ghazi52
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Thread starter
- #879
The 27th Amendment is an affront to the spirit of the Constitution, says Aurat March Lahore
The group released a statement accusing the amendment of stripping the few safeguards that allowed citizens to hold those in power accountable.
Images Staff
11 Nov, 2025
The Lahore chapter of the Aurat March has shared a scathing statement about the contentious 27th Constitutional Amendment Bill, which was passed in the Senate on Monday, calling it an “affront to the spirit of the Constitution”.
In a statement released the same day, the collective categorically rejected the amendment, saying it “defangs the judiciary and undermines the very spirit of the 1973 Constitution”..
ghazi52
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Thread starter
- #880
The vote on the 27th constitutional amendment has been delayed until tomorrow (Wednesday) in the National Assembly. Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar tabled the 27th Constitutional Amendment in the National Assembly on Tuesday, a day after its smooth passage through the Senate.
The National Assembly (NA) began its session on Tuesday morning, led by Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, to vote on the 27th Constitutional Amendment. The session began with prayers for the late Senator Irfan Siddiqui, after which lawmakers are expected to debate and decide on the proposed changes that have drawn sharp criticism from legal and political circles alike.
Tarar said the bill “seeks to strengthen institutional harmony and judicial accountability” and added that past amendments “caused unnecessary friction between the judiciary and parliament”...
The National Assembly (NA) began its session on Tuesday morning, led by Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq, to vote on the 27th Constitutional Amendment. The session began with prayers for the late Senator Irfan Siddiqui, after which lawmakers are expected to debate and decide on the proposed changes that have drawn sharp criticism from legal and political circles alike.
Tarar said the bill “seeks to strengthen institutional harmony and judicial accountability” and added that past amendments “caused unnecessary friction between the judiciary and parliament”...
Yousafzai_M
Registered Member
For bootlickers, anyone who doesn't agree is a cultist. I am not a fan of PTI - they turned out to be as corrupt as the others.
Showbaaz, plastic bitch, nawaja, madari 10% and billo rani - all 'selected' leaders who don't mind elevating Muneera first to 'Field Marshal' - I am still waiting for someone to tell me exactly which war did he win, and now making him taa-hayat whatever because he is such a gift of God to Pakistan.
This is cringe enough to make anyone throw up - anyone with a bit of self worth that is.
Countries have armies and in Pakistan, Army has a country - in practice that has been true since the first 'Field Marshal' but now they have made it constitutional. Muneera and others who will follow him are above the law - not just practically but now officially.
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
What’s there to "analyze"? Can’t you simply read the writing on the wall in this "constitutional" amendment and look for yourself where Pakistan is headed after that?
Meengla
Elite Member
'Spirit of the 1973 Constitution'. Yes, it does. Is it bad? Only time will tell but in a country where a sitting Prime Minister flagrantly throws out a required vote on a No Confidence Motion and then become a hero by paddling his falsehood, don't expect some Jeffersonian Democracy.
The 27th Amendment is for stability and focus. And looking at some prominent business entities' statements, some of them are indeed welcoming it because they, of all people know, that 'stability' is what Pakistan needs. Plenty of countries have advanced to the next stage of their socio-economic evolution by being under 'authoritarian system'. Pakistan needs to shed its half-baked experimentations with 'democracy', tried since 1988 after Zia's death, and put its house on order. The Messiah Khan himself was engineering something like the 27 Amendment stability with some top Generals but didn't work out for him.
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
So the country’s constitution only applies to the prime minister and not also to everyone else who violates it, such as the military establishment?
Forsvaret
Trusted Member
So you would’ve actually "supported" Messiah Khan if it indeed had worked for him or you would’ve still opposed him in your stubborn Bughaz-e-Imran?
