Pakistan Asking Afghans to Accept Durand line is Wrong as per the head of Tehreek e Tahaffuz e Ayeen

[Forsvaret]

So basically IK has decided to burn the country down?

No. He has decided to give military establishment "tough time" just like they have given him and his party for the past few years. That’s not burning the country down but to build pressure in power politics.

 

[Forsvaret]

That afridi dude, this achacka or whatever his name is, you can't sit with these scumbags…

Why not? If Afridis and Achakzais are still citizens of Pakistan, then sure you can and must sit with them.

 

[SteppeWolff]

The choice is always with the military establishment. They can either go ahead and do whatever they like as if the country only belongs to them.

But it does!! They shat on the overwhelming majority's choice and installed their own, and now amending the constitution as well. You are a bloody civilian. Know your place.

 

[Oscar]

You can literally read them on the first page of this thread :

What does the constitution of Pakistan not existing or not implemented or otherwise have to do with the RIGHT and WRONG on Pakistan’s territorial integrity.

 

[Oscar]

No. He has decided to give military establishment "tough time" just like they have given him and his party for the past few years. That’s not burning the country down but to build pressure in power politics.

Does IK esteemed vision include breaking the country up along ethnic lines through “tough time”?

 

[hussain0216]

Why not? If Afridis and Achakzais are still citizens of Pakistan, then sure you can and must sit with them.

Not when their loyalty is to Afghanistan

You can't safeguard your country when these people have no loyalty to it and don't see themselves as Pakistani

Their plan of action is to advance the interests of Afghanistan, erase the border so afghans can control the area

Their is literally nothing to speak about


All PPP, PMLN etc want is money and power, you can negotiate with that

 

[Forsvaret]

What does the constitution of Pakistan not existing or not implemented or otherwise have to do with the RIGHT and WRONG on Pakistan’s territorial integrity.

The OP out of nowhere brought in the country’s constitution in Pakistan’s territorial integrity debate:

Apparently this guy doesn't know that Durand line is international border between Pakistan and Afghanistan as per the constitution that he is supposed to defend and asking Afghans to accept it is exactly what constitution says

All my counters was because of that. Had he not brought in the constitution here, I would have no issues with his original statement.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Apparently this guy doesn't know that Durand line is international border between Pakistan and Afghanistan as per the constitution that he is supposed to defend and asking Afghans to accept it is exactly what constitution says

He is very well known traitor of Pakistan

 

[Forsvaret]

Does IK esteemed vision include breaking the country up along ethnic lines through “tough time”?

No. Imran Khan stands for the unity of the nation, given his party being the only one found with support across the entirety of Pakistan (even beyond among overseas Pakistanis). Which is why he is repeatedly warning the military establishment to not repeat their past mistakes which led to the breakup of East Pakistan on ethnic lines.

 

[krash]

Already answered above:

Aha, so the political equivalent to a terrorist suicide bomber; I will destroy you, the country, and the people if I don't get what I want. Clearly, true patriot love.

No. Imran Khan stands for the unity of the nation, given his party being the only one found with support across the entirety of Pakistan (even beyond among overseas Pakistanis). Which is why he is repeatedly warning the military establishment to not repeat their past mistakes which led to the breakup of East Pakistan on ethnic lines.

And nothing unites a nation better than appointing ethno-nationalists spewing enemy state's propaganda to important political positions.

 

[Oscar]

The OP out of nowhere brought in the country’s constitution in Pakistan’s territorial integrity debate:

All my counters was because of that. Had he not brought in the constitution here, I wouldn’t have complained.

Because the Durand line is defined as a border in the constitution.
Whether you take this constitution, others prior to it - it is a border.
You are making up flippant excuses to bring in semantical nonsense regarding your dear leaders total idiocy in appointing a known corrupt politician into a role.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

I AM thankful for their services to the nation. But I just can’t worship them as "heroes" like the recent 27th "amendment" demands.

If India will attack Pakistan with full force in future who will save Pakistan? You or your beloved IK or Pakistan's military forces who most probably flee from Pakistan in case of an attack along with most of politicians

 

[Forsvaret]

Because the Durand line is defined as a border in the constitution.

It doesn’t matter what the "constitution" says anyway after the 27th "amendment".
As for the Durand-line, that is an internationally recognized border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. All nation states must accept that including Afghanistan.

 

[Forsvaret]

If India will attack Pakistan with full force in future who will save Pakistan?

Armed forces are duty bound to defend the country from external enemies. Why was this even a question?

 

[Forsvaret]

There will be no breakup, Pakistan is nuclear. We will nuke our own territory if there is a risk of losing it.

Sure. If that’s the country’s military doctrine, why not?

You think you can give your cheap threats just like the talibs do.

Huh? Treating me like an "external" enemy now. Ok.