Sam6536
Registered Member
The eternal question:
With a 7:1 superiority, numerically, technically, economically in population and geographically why does India allow Pakistan to exist at all after 4 wars over 7 decades? Why a "ceasefire " every time?
Each time Infian generals threaten total destruction and "erasing from the map " and then accept a ceasefire.
Pakistan is still around, last we checked.
@Corax @hnn
@Meengla
First of all keep the political jingoism aside, the statements of "destruction" of either country is meant for the masses/local audience not for serious commentators. Over the decades even from your side there have been generals who have stated this rhetoric.
It's just rhetoric.
As for the first part of your comment i understand it to be this question
"why didn't India stream roll through Pakistan even with it's superiority"
Because Pakistan has nukes. Post 1947 Indo-Pak armies were squarely on the same level with the same level of machinery. Operation Brasstacks was the last window of opportunity for India to launch an all out offensive.
India's objectives in 1947, 1965, 1971, and 1999 were limited
1947: Stop Pakistani irregulars and secure J&K.
1965: Repel infiltration and restore the status quo. Pakistani "Operation Gibraltar" and "Grand Slam" failed, India held more territory
1971: Protect East Pakistan's refugees, support Bangladesh, and neutralize Pakistan's eastern front. India achieved this completely.
1999: Evict intruders from Kargil. India recaptured all Kargil heights, Pakistan withdrew under global pressure.
At no point was India's war objective to "destroy Pakistan".
Also no major power among the USA, Russia or China would allow the subcontinent to collapse into total war, especially with nuclear escalation risks.





