unconventional
Registered Member
If Israel did not suffer significant damages; and if Iran suffered irreversible damage, along with the barrage of missiles slowing down significantly; you could have been damn sure Israel would have gone for the kill.prior to the war Iran was enriching uranium and now 7 months later it is not (according to satellite imagery and clear public statements of the government)
prior to the war Israel had nuclear weapons and F-35s and it still has nuclear weapons and the exact same number of F-35s
we have extensive satellite imagery of damage to 20+ SSM bases, MoD bases, SPND facilities, air bases, missile production sites, vital nuclear facilities, etc. and we can monitor the slow rebuilding of these facilities.
if you have evidence of equivalent damage to similarly important Israeli military sites, feel free to share it, rather than engaging in the usual copium.
we saw from satellite imagery of Nevatim and Tel Nof from Operation True Promise II that 180-200 missiles only damaged 4-5 buildings, which do not appear critical. all evidence suggests that the level of damage inflicted by each side is not comparable at all.
Israelis like to finish the job, especially when they see fear, weakness, and a total victory for themselves.
So just like the international media narrative on how they completely obliterated Hezbollah, and Hezbollah doesn’t have any of its prior capabilities intact, I would err on the side of caution on the Iran reporting as well.







