Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

True.....however, they won't do it, because we can do the same to them. It's already been proven, they attacked a few key facilities and after we answered in kind, they immediately stopped. One other thing, they got word from the US not to attack our oil facility....why? Because the US knows, if they destroy our oil refineries.....the UAE's gas terminals will be toast, as well as the huge ARAMCO sites in SA....lastly, if Iran is pushed into the corner, the US knows that the Strait of Hormuz will be in play......in other words, Iran at that point will go for broke...and it will close it down! So, they did the economic cost vs benefit analysis and learned it's not worth to lose trillions of dollars to appease Netanyahu, not only that, but there could a region wide war, and a world wide recession....on top of the mess of Ukraine and Russia stuff.
No sane country/strategist would risk that....not for Iran, I mean look, Iran is very small issue for the US itself( Iran couldn't hurt the US even if it tried, except through oil).....all of these expenditures are for the Zios. At some point they will say ok, you're on your own Bibs......good luck.

China also was against any attacks on Iran oil and gas facilities since it effects them aswell. I think regional countries also oppose any war against Iran. Its only Israel and gcc who want Iran finished off.
 
There is an article out today, saying Israel will try to attack Iran in 2026.....I hope they do, because I want us to unleash on these criminal pigs in a big way.
We need to get ready for battle......the next 3 yrs is the danger time line for us, as long as Trump is in power, he will give the zios support....once he's out of office, I think we will see a big shift in the US-Israel relations. In the meantime we have to stay alert. They have shown their hands, they will use ABLM and drones, they will use the MEK stooges inside Iran. This time there is no excuse not to develop plans to counter that.
Also, we need to secure the border and prepare something that they're not able to be ready for. They're vulnerable to multi prong attacks, we need to exploit that, Mainland Iran, Lebanon, and Yemen. We need to also think about Syrian territory, how? I don't know....but the next time these guys want to mow the lawn in our land we have to make sure the lawn mower malfunctions and cuts off the driver's limbs.

Iran must build a small but lethal airforce, to make sure Israeli planes are chased away before they fire any missiles. The Iranian airforce can also protect missile sites and factories. Iran also needs submarines and destroyers who can fire 1000km + missiles. This way Iran has the capability to retaliate from different platforms rather than just land launched missiles.
 
View attachment 164879

Iran currently possesses around 2,000 heavy ballistic missiles, roughly the same number it had on the eve of the war.

“This is a threat that Israel will not be able to accept for long, and we must coordinate with the Americans the red lines and actions we will take in the future, perhaps even in the near future,” a source familiar with the matter told Al-Monitor.

--

Zionist propaganda seeks to downplay impact of Israeli strikes on Iran's missile program
Israel says Iran currently has 2000 heavy ballistic missiles which is equal to the amount Iran had prior to the 12 Day War.

If it is true, than assuming Iran had 2000 heavy missile in June 2025 and than 600 missile had been launched at Israel during the war and if Iran still has 2000 heavy missiles in December 2025 than this means Iran produced 600 heavy missiles in the last 6 month which indicates production rate of 100 heavy missiles per month or 1200 heavy missiles per year.

If Iran produces 1200 missiles per year, than in 8 years it will accumulate 12.000 heavy ballistic missiles which can destroy 12.000 multistore buildings in Israel with 1,8mln residents and with damage equivalent to several nuclear strikes.
 
Last edited:
If Iran produces 1200 missiles per year, than in 8 years it will accumulate 12.000 heavy ballistic missiles which can destroy 12.000 multistore buildings in Israel with 1,8mln residents and with damage equivalent to several nuclear strikes.
While the Hasbara media is not trustworthy, you can just make yourself an idea checking just google maps;

1º.- Shahrud. See the differente sizes of first stages stored,


2º.- Hamasin, south east Tehran;


You can see newer constructions undergoing close the place.

3º.- Hamasin, few hundreds meters to the east;


4º.- Hamasin, 500 meters at the north;


It is a truly missile city.

There are other places like Isfahan;

5º.- https://www.google.com/maps/@32.974...try=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTIwOS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw==

It is at the north of HESA company. Seems to be a missile factory much older. The lack of sand walls maybe indicate it is a liquid fuel missile assembly place. If you follow the unpaved road you will find some entrances inside the mountain.

And those are just the more evident. Under earth there may be more factories of liquid fuel missiles.

So it is correct, hundreds of missiles yearly.
 
Kheybar Shikan and Fattah-1 Hypersonic are two major problems for layered ABM shield of Israel.

1- Both follow Skip-Glide trajectory for added KE/speed. Fattah can go full skip-glide but KS is estimated to have partial Skip-Glide trajectory atleast.
2- Both do not hit high apogee so Space based SAT Jamming is useless against them if they seek mid course INS-SAT correction. Apparently IRGCASF saw this during TP1/2 when longer ranged MRBM MarRVed-Emad were jammed (later received CPRA patches as "Etemad) but KS did not.
3- If lofted at high apogee then can easily hit 2000+ KM MRBM ranges as conventional MaRVed BMs. Skip Glide trajectory adds KE but reduces range.
4- Both are MaRVs so can produce lateral maneuvers, although at the cost of speed but its very difficult to intercept in terminal phase.
5- Both weigh low enough to be adapted as ALBMs esp Fattah-1 is ~4 Tonnes. IRGCASF used C fibre in some missiles and SLVs (Kickoff stages) to reduce weight.
6- Despite being extensively used, none has ever been intercepted. No evidence exists.
7- Both can hit CEP within 5-15 m.
7- IRGCASF is apparently pushing their production.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Israel says Iran currently has 2000 heavy ballistic missiles which is equal to the amount Iran had prior to the 12 Day War.

If it is true, than assuming Iran had 2000 heavy missile in June 2025 and than 600 missile had been launched at Israel during the war and if Iran still has 2000 heavy missiles in December 2025 than this means Iran produced 600 heavy missiles in the last 6 month which indicates production rate of 100 heavy missiles per month or 1200 heavy missiles per year.

If Iran produces 1200 missiles per year, than in 8 years it will accumulate 12.000 heavy ballistic missiles which can destroy 12.000 multistore buildings in Israel with 1,8mln residents and with damage equivalent to several nuclear strikes.

2000 heavy missiles are too less. Many missiles are also shot down. Iran needs atleast 20,000 missiles to secure its future and existence. Let's say 50% are destroyed on the ground and air but 50% strike rate. I don't wish harm on anyone but Iran needs real deterrence to gurantee another attack does not take place. If Iran refuses to build nukes then they need powerful warheads aswell.
 
2000 heavy missiles are too less. Many missiles are also shot down. Iran needs atleast 20,000 missiles to secure its future and existence. Let's say 50% are destroyed on the ground and air but 50% strike rate. I don't wish harm on anyone but Iran needs real deterrence to gurantee another attack does not take place. If Iran refuses to build nukes then they need powerful warheads aswell.

Right now, precision and better target selection is equally as important as the number of missiles. Targets need to be selected that fall in within the CEP of the missiles themselves and offer a good return on investment in terms of target destruction relative to the cost of the missile. The actual number of "good" hits that were precise like the institute, and oil refineries were quite low. Target selection that caused actual pain to Israel got better in the later part of the conflict, as the outset, targeting airbases was and with its current CEP limitations, a waste of missiles.
 
Last edited:
Naafe static test again in October

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Qaem-100-Satellite-Launch-Vehicle.jpg


IRGCASF is getting serious with Qaem-105 ICBM. Without nuclear warhead, what purpose will it serve ? Either these people have a secret parallel HEU->WGU transition facilities or IRGC is posturing against EU.
 
Naafe static test again in October

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Qaem-100-Satellite-Launch-Vehicle.jpg


IRGCASF is getting serious with Qaem-105 ICBM. Without nuclear warhead, what purpose will it serve ? Either these people have a secret parallel HEU->WGU transition facilities or IRGC is posturing against EU.


Maybe an EMP as the warhead?
 
Maybe an EMP as the warhead?
Reports came out after the war that Israel struck Iranian ability to manufacture and emp device but who knows if it’s true or not but if it’s true let’s assume there were secret but not so secret tests that were observed and Israel actually got scared
 
Maybe an EMP as the warhead?

Occum's razor is nuclear delivery for which ICBMs exist. Political explanation can be Iran posturing against EU for leverage in talks. Europeans are exceptionally sensitive to perception of threat then being actually threatened. Take their history with Russia as example.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


IRGC successfully conducted a static test of a heavy engine in October 2025

Qiam-105, a new heavy MRBM, or first stage of Qiam-120 are some of the possibilities. Qiam-105 is less likely considering it uses the same engines as Qiam-100.
 
Without a nuke the qiam concept is just fools paradise
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top