Tumba
Registered Member
This was very unfair and unbalanced water treaty … it was injustice with people of India…
Who accepts 80:20 water sharing principle?
Where 80% goes to lower riparian…
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 168724
idk maybe just look at the fucking map
sure man didn't know you could own water80% of Indian water
sure man didn't know you could own water
get a time machines and fix it . or stop crying70% to India and 30% to Pakistan was a fair deal…
View attachment 168726
and you have more rivers for that .
because we had better negotiatorsWhy shud 230 million Pakistani get 80%

So, will Munir step in to defend Pakistan from this attack on its sovereignty or will he be content being a minerals salesman and boot polisher of Trump and keep awarding himself promotions and medals for continued failures and the murder of democracy?View attachment 168765
EDITORIAL: India's renewed push to fast-track several disputed hydropower projects on the Indus basin rivers controlled by Pakistan is not a coincidence.
The move is less about New Delhi’s energy ambitions and more about its ulterior motives to deploy a shared water system as an instrument of coercion against Pakistan. The recent approval of the Dulhasti Stage-II hydropower project on the Chenab, following the revival of environmental clearances for the much larger, decades-old Sawalkote scheme, is a clear signal of a deliberate acceleration of dam-building on the river allocated to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty.
That this push comes in the aftermath of India’s unilateral suspension of the water treaty following this year’s attack in Pahalgam in occupied Kashmir lends credence to reports that New Delhi is planning to build water storage on Pakistan’s rivers to control their flows downstream.
Read full editorial: https://www.dawn.com/news/1964260/
This is called "theft of natural resources". It has been explained repeatedly that "abeyance" is a non-existent term in the context of the IWT. The state of abeyance is a simple fabrication that actually represents breach of a treaty and theft of natural resources to cause harm upon civilians.It will always be in abeyance. Pakistan whether accepts it or not , does not matter.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.