Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most of these photos are from buildings within range of SH-15, M109 and other artillery munitions. Only about 35-40% of the imagery going around shows real potential hits, 60-65% is Pakistanis misidentifying artifacts and low quality sat imagery. It’s important to differentiate between the two.I'm sorry but someone's gotta stop this circlejerking here, if you think all Fatah 1 can do is ALLEGEDLY some burn marks on a building, then you gotta seriously re-evaluate your critical thinking skills. P.S It's not burn marks either
If a Fatah-1 hit any of these buildings it would literally obliterate it or cause significant damage to its structure. We have seen what our missiles did against Iran so why are we saying that this is all that Fatah-1 can do here?
No one is circle jerking here. Everyone is sharing as much information. It's up to you, to come up with your own conclusion. Please refer to this X post at least. Seems fitting with a Fatah-1 strike.
Based on the image, it seems that the sides were disintegrated, but the main structure is still standing. My only educated guess will be that either the missile was slightly off target or maybe a loitering munition was used instead.Regarding the first post, this is a shed so its structural integrity is quite weak, so why is it that supposedly a Fatah-1 impact can only whisk off roof cladding? How come we do not see a roof collapse or collapse of the wider structure as seen in the strike of the hangar at Sukkur?
The second post is probably the best post so far from the guy regarding any damage to structures.
I don't recall artillery being used across the IB or towards targets into India proper, but i could be wrong.Most of these photos are from buildings within range of SH-15, M109 and other artillery munitions. Only about 35-40% of the imagery going around shows real potential hits, 60-65% is Pakistanis misidentifying artifacts and low quality sat imagery. It’s important to differentiate between the two.
Pakistan launched <30 F1 missiles total, the number is between 21-27 most likely. Attributing everything to F1 is inaccurate regardless of how the hit looks. I’ve maintained from day 1 that whether a target was hit or not, IAF AD generally failed to intercept most Pakistani munitions, they either missed or in some cases hit, interceptions were rare.Regarding the first post, this is a shed so its structural integrity is quite weak, so why is it that supposedly a Fatah-1 impact can only whisk off roof cladding? How come we do not see a roof collapse or collapse of the wider structure as seen in the strike of the hangar at Sukkur?
The second post is probably the best post so far from the guy regarding any damage to structures.
Artillery was definitely used along the IB too but not as indiscriminately as in Kashmir due to collateral damage. Amritsar (where most of these images are from) is very comfortably within Artillery range.I don't recall artillery being used across the IB or towards targets into India proper, but i could be wrong.
I highly doubt artillery was exchanged there in Amritsar, otherwise we would have seen reports of counter battery across the border. Opening up artillery across the IB would probably light up the whole border so i am highly skeptical of that. You cannot contain something like that.Artillery was definitely used along the IB too but not as indiscriminately as in Kashmir due to collateral damage. Amritsar (where most of these images are from) is very comfortably within Artillery range.
I don't recall artillery being used across the IB or towards targets into India proper, but i could be wrong.
Dude, this is a fatah-1 we are talking about, the roof would have been ripped off by the impact and if it didn't hit the main structure then where is the impact site/crater?Based on the image, it seems that the sides were disintegrated, but the main structure is still standing. My only educated guess will be that either the missile was slightly off target or maybe a loitering munition was used instead.
Maybe other members can shed light on this.
Have they been geolocated to be there? If so I would love to know. Most videos I have seen are of the WB or LoC.I have seen sh-15 atleast used across IB in several videos
There was barely any Indian counter battery fire in Kashmir, let alone IB. That wasn’t really their focus, one could ask similarly why we didn’t use our cruise missiles.I highly doubt artillery was exchanged there in Amritsar, otherwise we would have seen reports of counter battery across the border. Opening up artillery across the IB would probably light up the whole border so i am highly skeptical of that. You cannot contain something like that.
It's 2 month old imagery ffsDude, this is a fatah-1 we are talking about, the roof would have been ripped off by the impact and if it didn't hit the main structure then where is the impact site/crater?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.