Ibbi32
Registered Member
More like the bolan
“Abhi bhi jaga bachi hai aik do bombs aur laga do”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More like the bolan
I'm sorry. It's my fault.LT and LS series is supposedly made by a subsidiaries of AVIC.
View attachment 169580View attachment 169581
na bhai M for Mehran and M for mirageMore like the bolan
It would, H4 literally 90s, think by PAF would have IIR/EO seekers we've seen that seeker on different REKs too.
iIR is just a sensor which provide day/night capability. The guidance is pilot controlled.No, I have watched the documentary pilot mentioned, fire launching I gave control to the pilot
im guessing they probably do have some form of target recog, now obviously i dont know the ins and outs, but, based off of the lrashm, you can do some pretty cool things with a high fidelity seekerI am talking about taimoor having ATR.
iIR is just a sensor which provide day/night capability. The guidance is pilot controlled.
affirm, it does hint at the paf wanting something more capable for anti shipping.The most interesting detail for me is the mention of sea targets, as well as land, which would explain the IIR.
im guessing they probably do have some form of target recog, now obviously i dont know the ins and outs, but, based off of the lrashm, you can do some pretty cool things with a high fidelity seeker
I would suspect the AShCM already onboard PN vessels will have the similar IIR and processing, I see this as more of a redundancy and additional option for the PAF and maybe on the Sea Sultan for airborne attack. Given the long range of 600km, low level skimming flight path, and IIR, it would be quite a stealthy attack vector compared with say a terminal radar homing guidance AShM as it won't trigger RWR or ECM on the target vessel, and give too short a reaction time. But then again, having a boosted version on PN vessels wouldn't be a bad thing.affirm, it does hint at the paf wanting something more capable for anti shipping.
i wonder whether this could mean the pn would deploy these onboard sea sultans
The purpose of IIR itself is to make a missile ATR. TERCOM/DSMAC allows the missile to fly to predetermined location. IIR allows it precisely target the data by comparing the images stored in the missile memory. Since we don't have live datalinks/satellite guidance/Man in the loop. So target reassignment/ Hitting target of opportunity in real time will obviously be missing from the feature set.
As far as I know, nope. If someone is guiding a missile, then it has to be a tv seeker. IIR makes the missile autonomous.

harbah has an iir option for what its worth, not sure what the pn's qualms were with it and why they chose not to pursue it further.I would suspect the AShCM already onboard PN vessels will have the similar IIR and processing, I see this as more of a redundancy and additional option for the PAF and maybe on the Sea Sultan for airborne attack. Given the long range of 600km, low level skimming flight path, and IIR, it would be quite a stealthy attack vector compared with say a terminal radar homing guidance AShM as it won't trigger RWR or ECM on the target vessel, and give too short a reaction time. But then again, having a boosted version on PN vessels wouldn't be a bad thing.

View attachment 169579
Blink & you miss it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.