Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


tumblr_inline_mqgfq0yoXd1qz4rgp.gif


Saudi Arabia has signed a deal of US $ 4 billion with Pakistan.

Saudi is buying JF17 fighter jets from Pakistan.

Libya is also buying US$ 4 billions military weapons from Pakistan.

Azerbaijan is also Buying US$4 billion military weapons from Pakistan.

Means 10 days war with India has changed Pakistan’s future.

Now every country wants to buy military weapons from Pakistan.

🤣
 
Last edited:
also add sudan and bangladesh🤣
RocketLaw said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


tumblr_inline_mqgfq0yoXd1qz4rgp.gif


Saudi Arabia has signed a deal of US $ 4 billion with Pakistan.

Saudi is buying JF17 fighter jets from Pakistan.

Libya is also buying US$ 4 billions military weapons from Pakistan.

Azerbaijan is also Buying US$4 billion military weapons from Pakistan.

Means 10 days war with India has changed Pakistan’s future.

Now every country wants to buy military weapons from Pakistan.

🤣
Click to expand...
 
AeronautIR said:
This is an excellent question and its answer lies in understanding that BVR range is not fixed. Meteor has the largest NEZ of around 60 km and its operational range is claimed to be 100 km. Though estimated range is 200km, its kill probability reduces drastically if target is at 150 km.

Simply put, PL-15 has an advantage over Meteor in a fight at the ranges we saw in Op Sindoor. Other factors like IAF complacency, system integration, PAF tactics of silent kill chain, pilot training for last 5 years focused on countering Meteor and S-400 etc also played an important role.

The Rafales shot down at lesser ranges were at lower altitudes. The J-10C pilots were waiting for HQ-9 to shine and Rafale pilots naturally descended to avoid SAM threat. At that exact moment, J-10 moved in for the kill when Meteor range was reduced by say 40-50 km due altitude. So it was a choreographed fight and should not be seen as just J-10's PL-15 vs Rafale's Meteor.
Click to expand...
Wow..these details seem to be appearing on a public forum for the first time. I couldn't be more proud of the PAF. I truly hope this information does not provide any tactical advantage to India
 
maverik said:
Wow..these details seem to be appearing on a public forum for the first time. I couldn't be more proud of the PAF. I truly hope this information does not provide any tactical advantage to India
Click to expand...
If they were not aware of these details then they have no business being in cockpits or leading combat with 4.5 generations jets.
 
maverik said:
Wow..these details seem to be appearing on a public forum for the first time. I couldn't be more proud of the PAF. I truly hope this information does not provide any tactical advantage to India
Click to expand...
They already understand far more than this since May. A deal worth 8.7 billion focused on networking is a testament to it. I don't know anything which Indian military doesn't know in much more detail. They just underestimate us due to their delusions of grandeur.
 
AeronautIR said:
The Multi-Domain Operations included EW, IADS, GBADs, cyber etc. So initially, HQ-9 was off, J-10 at a farther range and only Electronic attacks to disrupt the incoming raid. At a precise moment, HQ-9 radar was going to lock the package in IOK. Expecting them to take defensive action, J-10 went in hot without worrying about Meteor at that exact time.

You can see the kill difference between the Punjab and Kashmir packages. Just 1 Rafale in Bhatinda, rest all up North. With Meteor and S-400, it wasn't that simple in the South.
Click to expand...

That explains why the Bhatinda Rafale was shot at around 35 K Ft altitude. Unlike the ones in north at lower altitudes.
 
Tomcats said:
This AI slop is terrible.

Again a weathered roof and panel missing from a shed, there are also panels missing from a hangar at Masroor, are we going to say that Masroor was hit by drones? There are also similar roof discolorations at our bases, this doesn't mean anything.
Click to expand...
Have you seen other images from Google Maps? Whole roofs are missing completely.
That has nothing to do with discolouration. When a roof's structure changes, it is damaged by a hit.
 
falcon34 said:
Can our AWACS guide HQ9 missiles like they did for PL15?.
Click to expand...
Hello sir,

1. Yes — PAF’s Saab 2000 (Erieye), Falcon DA-20, and ZDK-03 can provide mid-course update data

2. No — they do NOT send guidance commands directly to the missile

3. They provide engagement-quality tracking updates to the air-defense network, not to the missile itself.

4. I have studied that saab 2000 and zdk software enhancements are done indigenous by pakistan engineers. I have also mentioned in taimoor alcm thread. Its one marvel that the softwares are updated with real good quality so it should be proud moment.

5. Awacs in pakistan are no more early earning rather battle systems with possibility of air to air soft kills.

6. DA 20 does elint and cyber missions while awacs does early warning and guidance and yes it provides enough data to enhance ground modules of hq9 to guide the missile in mid course. So indirectly yes it provides mid course updates just unlik directly to pl15

Hope this answers that.
 
NA71 said:
Lo g aik aur aa gaya....not AI ....pure content

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

A side note: His mustache seems not to grow from the upper lip but from his nostrils.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 125 (members: 1, guests: 124)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top