Psyko70
Trusted Member
I am discounting euro fighters as they are not going to be easily replaceable with condition of its creators like UK assembly almost halted due to last order in 2009. and KSA in 2007 last received in 2017. Production line is active but has not been continuously active. with max 14 aircraft per year currently its not going to be easy to replace.That is a false assumption.
1. KSA may not ever be in conflict with Israel other than a far shot situation where Israel uses KSA airspace for a strike(as a show of force for regional messaging).
2. F-15s being used against Israel might have certain compromising situation but that doesnt mean they will be sitting ducks either. They also have Typhoons which you are discounting just because I think you want to hate on US equipment.
About 2 points you made
1. That is all assumption. Anything is possible, Israel going against KSA in future is possible. Just because current KSA has happy relation with Israel. US veto is possible.
2. US has the best equipment in airforce period. I dont hate US equipment. My hate is for US geopolitics.
I want to add
3. JF17 is best option in terms of sanction free and very vast roles. F15 will take year or more to replace the lose as compared to jf17. Even if we discard political constraints and no bottlenecks in production. jf17 assembly line already is more than ef2000 and if good orders come PAC already is working on increasing assembly lines
I think this discussion is repeating again and again. I am convinced in my assumption and your point is considered by me genuinely.
I'd rather have pack of wolves than a single tiger.
In the end we all want Pakistan and its industry to prosper




.




