Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

tsunset said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


More and more signs that the Orange Blob struggles to take a decision
Click to expand...

His mind is made up. He will attack.

He is just manipulating stock and commodities markets, particularly oil, before the event to make a quick buck.
 
KingQamaR said:
I’m just posting, I pray to God this is only a silly rumour!


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

They evacuated the bases in Qatar. The attack will come very soon.
 
PakFactor said:
Russia has survived this long due to China; it's no technological marvel of their part when they resorted to washing machine chips to run their military industrial complex. Thus far, their weapon systems have been a failure on the battlefield, coupled with their shit training.

Even after all this said, I support them in getting themselves killed and dragging others into Ukraine, it's a sacrifice I salute Russian mothers for.
Click to expand...
Their war effort has been less than ideal and crude at best but on societal level, they've withstood the collective assault of the West, there are no food shortages, high inflation, water scarcity or other such factors exploited by the zionazis of the west to bring down regimes and sow widespread chaos and anarchy in their targeted countries.

Russia has withstood this and has even thrived purely because it is one of the largest if not the largest wheat producer in the world, leading oil/gas producer, has ample water resources and has a massive nuke arsenal.
 
Liquidator said:
Colonial fascist mindset. Disgusting.



Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Iran will receive a major blow regardless. It must also respond in kind. Risk is, if it waits will be neutered before it can respond? They'll go for all their missile launch sites.

They'll use Cyprus as a buffer....

There is another complication.....Israel will stay out of the initial strikes....but technically Israel and the Americans/ Europeans are acting as one body to serve the zionist terrorists.

Is this sufficient for Iranians to go for Israel too? It's almost another trap....Israel will say Iran has violated ceasefire with us and They'll use this as an excuse also.

I suppose a good compromise is, this time, as soon as an attack is launched that they retaliate simultaneously. Unfortunately, stealth will ensure they are unlikely to realise before it's too late.

No option is looking good.
Click to expand...


depends on the nature of attack

low intensity attack from the US would mean, IR does not need to reply at all, rather focus on dissidents more

goes both ways for US as well
 
SaadH said:
Their war effort has been less than ideal and crude at best but on societal level, they've withstood the collective assault of the West, there are no food shortages, high inflation, water scarcity or other such factors exploited by the zionazis of the west to bring down regimes and sow widespread chaos and anarchy in their targeted countries.

Russia has withstood this and has even thrived purely because it is one of the largest if not the largest wheat producer in the world, leading oil/gas producer, has ample water resources and has a massive nuke arsenal.
Click to expand...

It's their nuclear arsenal preventing them from being run over by the West, and keeping them alive.
 
Every previous conflict from the U.S always had U.S carriers/destroyers in position. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are no carriers/destroyers near the Middle East, yet. That, along with the fact that these assets were important in shielding Iran's missiles during the June conflict between Iran and Israel.

That said, if U.S did want to do something against Iran, surely aside from U.S bases, Israel would also be vulnerable and therefore, to ensure their "prince" is well protected, the U.S would do all that they can to provide defense, including bringing carriers/destroyers?

All that said to say that means in the near short term, a conflict isn't all that likely with what is assumed from the above. Thoughts?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 11 more.
    • Total: 156 (members: 44, guests: 112)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top