Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Colonial fascist mindset. Disgusting.



Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Iran will receive a major blow regardless. It must also respond in kind. Risk is, if it waits will be neutered before it can respond? They'll go for all their missile launch sites.

They'll use Cyprus as a buffer....

There is another complication.....Israel will stay out of the initial strikes....but technically Israel and the Americans/ Europeans are acting as one body to serve the zionist terrorists.

Is this sufficient for Iranians to go for Israel too? It's almost another trap....Israel will say Iran has violated ceasefire with us and They'll use this as an excuse also.

I suppose a good compromise is, this time, as soon as an attack is launched that they retaliate simultaneously. Unfortunately, stealth will ensure they are unlikely to realise before it's too late.

No option is looking good.

depends on the nature of attack

low intensity attack from the US would mean, IR does not need to reply at all, rather focus on dissidents more

goes both ways for US as well

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

View attachment 172242
Six refullers tracked beign repositioned approx 12 mins ago.

action ready it seems

 

[PakFactor]

Their war effort has been less than ideal and crude at best but on societal level, they've withstood the collective assault of the West, there are no food shortages, high inflation, water scarcity or other such factors exploited by the zionazis of the west to bring down regimes and sow widespread chaos and anarchy in their targeted countries.

Russia has withstood this and has even thrived purely because it is one of the largest if not the largest wheat producer in the world, leading oil/gas producer, has ample water resources and has a massive nuke arsenal.

It's their nuclear arsenal preventing them from being run over by the West, and keeping them alive.

 

[CrniLabud]

US moved their ships and will use submarines as to avoid getting hit by missiles. This means they are anticipating a bigger reaction than last time.

 

[Beast89]

Jews really own USA

 

[SaadH]

It's their nuclear arsenal preventing them from being run over by the West, and keeping them alive.

Iran could have had their own mini-arsenal a la Pakistan/NK but they chose the appeasement route

 

[RescueRanger]

action ready it seems

Possibly - this could also be a move to reposition assets to prevent loss in retaliatory strikes. But thats a big logistical tell. Went transponder off 10 mins into flight.

 

[kubotabx23]

Every previous conflict from the U.S always had U.S carriers/destroyers in position. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are no carriers/destroyers near the Middle East, yet. That, along with the fact that these assets were important in shielding Iran's missiles during the June conflict between Iran and Israel.

That said, if U.S did want to do something against Iran, surely aside from U.S bases, Israel would also be vulnerable and therefore, to ensure their "prince" is well protected, the U.S would do all that they can to provide defense, including bringing carriers/destroyers?

All that said to say that means in the near short term, a conflict isn't all that likely with what is assumed from the above. Thoughts?

 

[KingQamaR]

 

[RescueRanger]

Lol these are not huge evacuations this is is a warning sign.

 

[mabubakar]

Lol these are not huge evacuations this is is a warning sign.

Aerial activity is high in Qatar today

 

[KingQamaR]

Lol these are not huge evacuations this is is a warning sign.

Thats still bad.

 

[tsunset]

They are putting the US soldiers to evacuate into the fighter jet fuel compartment?

 

[KingQamaR]

If only Iran had been successful enough like North Korea. One bomb would have deterred US.

 

[RescueRanger]

Every previous conflict from the U.S always had U.S carriers/destroyers in position.

My dear friend the US doesnt need a carrier strike group to achieve its objectives.