Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

Sorry guys but that name is already taken by Fattah-2™. Trademark infringement is a serious offence. I urge GIDS to change the name otherwise the IRGC-ASF have to take them to court.

Fattah-2-missile-EN.jpg
Well, as soon as any country is able to buy Iranian systems outside of Russia, Syria, Houthis and North Korea without repercussions of severe sanctions it would matter but can definitely start with their courts - although not really GIDS target market.

Although the Glide vehicle concept is cool
 
What was the logic behind naming the P-282? Is it because, it is a conventional weapon, it isn't part of the 'Hataf' series?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I am starting this thread after I saw a video today of Turkey testing its ATMACA missile with its own Turkish engine. So, the question which came to my mind is the engines which are used in Pakistani missiles. Do we make them, or we import them?
 
I am starting this thread after I saw a video today of Turkey testing its ATMACA missile with its own Turkish engine. So, the question which came to my mind is the engines which are used in Pakistani missiles. Do we make them, or we import them?
Pakistan has now developed indigenous turbojet engines for its cruise missiles,

Pakistan's GIDS
NTJ-V1 turbojet engines
Dry Weight 67 kg
Thrust 3.6 kN
Storage life 24 years
IMG_20240311_064654.jpgIMG_20240311_064549.jpg
 
Tomahawk Chinese copy ones of course. The failed tomahawks that fell in Pk in 2001-2 were promptly handed over to the Chinese for reverse engineering aka copying.

Proper iron little brother style.
Yeah - engines definitely a reverse engineering aspect but guidance is all inhouse from scratch.
The tomahawks were intact but that doesn’t mean you could copy code or create components just like that - it provided a blueprint for what needs to go into the package and how to package it efficiently… Raytheon is a master at this.

I actually had the code for the 1st iteration’s inertial and terrain avoidance at one point through poor opsec I guess that sat on a US designed floating point chip. But that was the simplest version and obsolete by the time I got it- today’s one can pick out a single individual window on a building and fly directly into it after overflying it and coming around.

If anything, that was a godsend - shaved millions of dollars on buying anything and gave Pakistan a serious CM backbone. Thank you Clinton.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top