Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Armed Forces Chief of Staff: Following 12-day war, we revised our defense doctrine, shifting it to an "offensive doctrine" based on lightning & wide-ranging operations. Adopting divergent strategies, our action will be fast, decisive, & beyond US calculations.

--

I don't find this very credible considering he said the opposite after the war. more likely propaganda to respond to Trump's threats. but time will tell.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Ali Bagheri Kani, Iran's SNSC Deputy for Foreign Policy: Iranian officials have no intention of transferring enriched nuclear material to any country, and the negotiations are not revolving around such a matter at all.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Armed Forces Chief of Staff: Following 12-day war, we revised our defense doctrine, shifting it to an "offensive doctrine" based on lightning & wide-ranging operations. Adopting divergent strategies, our action will be fast, decisive, & beyond US calculations.

--

I don't find this very credible considering he said the opposite after the war. more likely propaganda to respond to Trump's threats. but time will tell.
Click to expand...

If Iran strikes first then yeah I buy his claim in the sense they can cause a lot of damage to land bases but no credibility if US strikes first. US will make sure Iran's retaliation capability will be taken out first or severely degraded that it won't be considered a real threat.
 
Why does America's opponents always have to fight alone like Saddam's Iraq, Taliban and now Iran? USA enjoys a coalition willing to fight with them but those who want to oppose the USA in war always have to fight alone... Even in Korean War, Chinese provided most of the ground troops to help NK while Soviets only provide air cover/fighter support and not ground forces.

What is this phenomenon here where countries who fight the USA always have to fight with their own ground forces alone? Even in Vietnam War the USA has the freedom to "summon" at will reinforcement ground troops from "servant countries" like South Korea, but America's opponents always have to fight alone with their own armies... This ain't fair...
 
SolarWarden said:
If Iran strikes first then yeah I buy his claim in the sense they can cause a lot of damage to land bases but no credibility if US strikes first. US will make sure Iran's retaliation capability will be taken out first or severely degraded that it won't be considered a real threat.
Click to expand...
That's why I'm a proponent of Preemptive Strikes in a situation like this when it is clear nothing left to negotiate when one side wants to demand something Iran can't do which is limit missile size. It's clear the negotiations just to buy time until USA can bring in more forces...

Even in RPGs, battles usually end faster when we get the first drop on our enemies when we can preemptively initiate attacks against monsters before they can attack us in 2-3 more turns.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Iran plans to offer dilution of 60% HEU to 20% HEU

there will be no deal, but war
Click to expand...



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Several FMs of neighboring countries are reported to be showing up.

I wonder if this lends credence to the “enrichment consortium” idea where Iranian centrifuges will be used at a neutral site. Wishful thinking. But, Saudi Arabia has shown interest in nuclear enrichment and it’s likely Turkey has as well.

But what you posted saying Iran Offering to dilute HEU to 20% and continue enrichment is basically dead on arrival.

Iran is coming to the table with the same offer as pre June? Bold move
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Armed Forces Chief of Staff: Following 12-day war, we revised our defense doctrine, shifting it to an "offensive doctrine" based on lightning & wide-ranging operations. Adopting divergent strategies, our action will be fast, decisive, & beyond US calculations.

--

I don't find this very credible considering he said the opposite after the war. more likely propaganda to respond to Trump's threats. but time will tell.
Click to expand...

Any credibility to this claim? what options can IGRC and Iranian forces exercise?
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Several FMs of neighboring countries are reported to be showing up.

I wonder if this lends credence to the “enrichment consortium” idea where Iranian centrifuges will be used at a neutral site. Wishful thinking. But, Saudi Arabia has shown interest in nuclear enrichment and it’s likely Turkey has as well.

But what you posted saying Iran Offering to dilute HEU to 20% and continue enrichment is basically dead on arrival.

Iran is coming to the table with the same offer as pre June? Bold move
Click to expand...


This time its not about Iranian nuclear program but primarily Iranian Ballistic missile program which shattered israeli defense systems, like THAAD, David Sling, Arrow 2/3 and Iron Dome.

Israel wants complete dominance in middle east, Iran is the last country standing that can give severe beating to Israel.
 
Immortals said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Several FMs of neighboring countries are reported to be showing up.

I wonder if this lends credence to the “enrichment consortium” idea where Iranian centrifuges will be used at a neutral site. Wishful thinking. But, Saudi Arabia has shown interest in nuclear enrichment and it’s likely Turkey has as well.

But what you posted saying Iran Offering to dilute HEU to 20% and continue enrichment is basically dead on arrival.

Iran is coming to the table with the same offer as pre June? Bold move
Click to expand...

no bolder than the US demanding limits on Iran's only weapons of self defence (missiles)

and it makes sense considering IRI does not believe it lost the June war
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


can you also share the translation? i have missed out most of your posts, i am sure a lot of others too.
 
its the same ploy, Iraq Nuclear program was gone, but then the second attack was all about Iraqi remaining ballistic missile program with the pretext of WMD. At the end, the second attack on Iraq was to make sure that IRaq will never attack israel with its ballistic missiles.

This time around, its just brute force,
 
maverick said:
can you also share the translation? i have missed out most of your posts, i am sure a lot of others too.
Click to expand...
he is saying we should use the element of surprise and attack America's base in Jordan and the jets they are storing there to seize the initiative, like when we attacked Saudi Aramco
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 4 more.
    • Total: 133 (members: 30, guests: 103)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top