flyingorca
SpeedLimited
What damage did these Fatah caused? That report is also asking the same question as many rational posters here. Those who believe in objectivity and not “trust me bro”.
Firing is fine but causing damage and then providing proof are all part of the loop. ISPR has done only the part I of making the claim.
I a, sure, you would go into the same loop we have seen on the thread. Google earth images and a question - Tell me what is this?
That’s good for “Trust me bro” world, but not good enough for professionals who seek much more and the ones who wrote the report in question.
Same goes for Indian claims of shooting down aircraft on Pak side. They remain claims, till such time a verifiable proof is provided. As there is none till now, they fall in same class as Pak’s claims of damage on the ground this side.
Hi yapper, i know you are going to run away from me again. But tell me if India had air dominance then why was India firing surface to air missiles towards Pakistan and yet missed all their targets instead of your fighter jets employing air to air missile? BUK, Spider, 48N6, wreckages were found in Pakistan. No R77, no Mica, no Meteor. Where as on 2nd and 3rd day, PL15 debris were found in India.
As for Pakistani retaliation strikes, the purpose was to find Indian air to surface weaknesses and sure they did. If you just google Pakistan rockets/missiles found in India, almost ever other picture is that of Indian surface to air missiles that you guys misidentified as Pakistani rockets. As long as Pakistani rockets were hitting the ground it means Indian AD failed to intercept mere Rockets. Those rockets have higher trajectory meaning easier to detect now imagine what low flying cruise missiles would have done to Indian air bases.




