Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Hassan Al-Somal]

John Mearsheimer: “The Israelis are facing deep distress as the Trump administration appears unwilling to fully address their concerns regarding ballistic missiles & Hamas/Hezbollah support in potential negotiations with Iran, & even accepting some nuclear enrichment capability”

“This is a disaster for Netanyahu”

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Homajon]

And they are all so biadab, it's unbelievable who much slurs they use!
And when someone disagrees with them, all they can say is "modaret in", "khaharet in",.....
Ironic that people who claim to care about womens rights always insult females everytime they run out of arguments....the best is, If you would confront them in real life most of them would be little fishes, staring to the ground out of fear.....pathetic!

Here is a prime example. These are the people who care about womens rights. All they can do is insulting women.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

In real life, when you confront him face to face, he is a nobody....

 

[Fasbre2]

A modern aircraft carrier is impossible to sink. There have been lots of studies on this, and various scenarios have been tried out by the Americans in this regard.

The Titanic was also said to be impossible to sink. Even ‘God could not sink it’ is what the shipbuilder claimed…

Just need to hit the ‘pri-fly’ …

 

[vizier]

John Mearsheimer: “The Israelis are facing deep distress as the Trump administration appears unwilling to fully address their concerns regarding ballistic missiles & Hamas/Hezbollah support in potential negotiations with Iran, & even accepting some nuclear enrichment capability”

“This is a disaster for Netanyahu”

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

We talked a lot about ballistic missiles as Irans main means of deterrance and security measure.

Regarding Hezbollah / Houthis both Labennon and Yemen are under reignition of civil war risk. They intervened to israeli conflict later after Hamas-israel war to give support to Palestine. As the ceasefire holds with Hamas they wont restart the conflict. There is also a ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah-israel.

Other than that practically most supply routes are blocked after Syrian govt changed from Iran to Hezbollah. If Iranian limited support fades the tense condition inside Syria can easily spill inside Labennon. Same with Yemen. The conflict will restart again with Saudis or other groups as a civil war in Yemen reignites if Iranian support stops to Houthis. So as long as security conditions exist to protect the population support should continue without relation to anyone else

 

[tsunset]

The Camel Shit eating paying western Instagram models with dromedary feces on their head UAE terrorists are an imminent existential threat to Iran

If Iran is finished, they will send their Camel navy to take the islands of Iran

 

[Homajon]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Those Iranians, who were asleep before, got awaken after the 12day war (even from Canada )

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This is what I said, they dont exist in the real life, they are only tough in the internet

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Is this the confirmed location of Hajizadeh and Bagheri bunker? Did Israel use F-35’s? Very little information has come out on the strike.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[925boy]

A modern aircraft carrier is impossible to sink. There have been lots of studies on this, and various scenarios have been tried out by the Americans in this regard.

Iran doesnt need to sink a US carrier, it only needs to disable its deck and that is fine, but the houthis option may work for Iran too- engage the US aircraft carrier enough for the carrier to get worried about being hit, that it decides to quit aka exit its designated area of operation. US military personnel will also be veery demoralized if a US carrier is hit.

 

[925boy]

John Mearsheimer: “The Israelis are facing deep distress as the Trump administration appears unwilling to fully address their concerns regarding ballistic missiles & Hamas/Hezbollah support in potential negotiations with Iran, & even accepting some nuclear enrichment capability”

“This is a disaster for Netanyahu”

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

So israel is begging US secretly to help it dismantle hezbollah (through negotiations with Iran )but at the same time some on pdf are still telling us that Israel has dismantled hezbollah- these 2 facts are contradictory!

 

[Pak-Warrior]

If US is really bringing more resources and possibly the second carrier group then its like war is imminent and Iran is waiting until the enemy is fully deployed, assembled and prepared with all its assets in place.

Looks the "talks" are just time buying until US position everything in order?

If they are bringing more carrier groups then it seems US has made up its mind already. Then why to let enemy fully prepare and deploy?

I think Iran should tell the world and to the US that if they deploy any further resources at their door step that would mean declaration of war. Like another carrier group coming near 1000 miles would be considered an act of war. You just can't let enemy line up its assets around you peacefully. So if they back off that's well and good, if they don't then it means they are coming for war and you have every right to start your attacks.

 

[Shags101]

Iran doesnt need to sink a US carrier, it only needs to disable its deck and that is fine, but the houthis option may work for Iran too- engage the US aircraft carrier enough for the carrier to get worried about being hit, that it decides to quit aka exit its designated area of operation. US military personnel will also be veery demoralized if a US carrier is hit.

Well they won’t leave they will just keep going farther away like @Persian Gulf mentioned it will also make it harder for sea based bombers fighters to operate.

Best option for Iran send in the drones hundreds of them in different waves send in cruise missiles that can reach out that far but the only real true option is ballistic missiles built to hit sea targets with EO capabilities many of these can be done with their shorter range stock unless I’m mistaken they have ranges of 200 to 1000 miles

 

[Bahrami]

La Pucelle

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[LX1111]

Iran doesnt need to sink a US carrier, it only needs to disable its deck and that is fine, but the houthis option may work for Iran too- engage the US aircraft carrier enough for the carrier to get worried about being hit, that it decides to quit aka exit its designated area of operation. US military personnel will also be veery demoralized if a US carrier is hit.

It's different. The Red Sea is a very narrow body of water, and coastal radar can easily track aircraft carrier fleets. Iran also reportedly has a radar station in Sudan, which can provide auxiliary positioning from the other side. However, Iran faces a different situation. Aircraft carriers sail in the Indian Ocean, making accurate positioning very difficult. Iran's current method is to use drones for long-term tracking. But this method is quite vulnerable, and one drone has already been shot down by an F-35C.

 

[PakistaniDefender]

It's different. The Red Sea is a very narrow body of water, and coastal radar can easily track aircraft carrier fleets. Iran also reportedly has a radar station in Sudan, which can provide auxiliary positioning from the other side. However, Iran faces a different situation. Aircraft carriers sail in the Indian Ocean, making accurate positioning very difficult. Iran's current method is to use drones for long-term tracking. But this method is quite vulnerable, and one drone has already been shot down by an F-35C.

Try getting satellite data from China

 

[StrategicBear]

I'm not sure how an Aircraft Carrier wouldn't sink it it was hit by a Mach 10+ missile striking it from above...

The kinetic impact alone would punch through the deck easily, and when you add in HE warheads, bunker-buster warheads for max penetration, then 2 or 3 direct impacts with these Hypersonics would be enough to explode and ignite inside the structure, killing crews and causing massive fire/ammunition secondary explosions, finally rendering it a mission kill. If want to sink it even more, add in a few missiles including cruise missiles to ensure its total sinking.