Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Thank God indians are dumb, May they remain dumb like that

Apart from all the BS he wrote , i just cant fathom that they think their were nukes in nurkhan lol .
 
For all those who are against subsonic cruise missiles that Pakistan mostly rely upon can see that how US employed its Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening barrage of attack on Iran yesterday. These missiles flew through Iraq following the trajectory towards Iranian targets.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
For all those who are against subsonic cruise missiles that Pakistan mostly rely upon can see that how US employed its Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening barrage of attack on Iran yesterday
yes they work when u have basically no AD to speak of
 
yes they work when u have basically no AD to speak of
Not really, if these are really tomahawks flying, then you can judge they are barely 50-100meters above land......tracking them at such low altitude is very very difficult unless you have airborne aerial assets 24/7. To take them out you need good tracking ability.......most ADs are not optimized for that but rather a slant tracking area upwards.
 
this is again a lesson from iran war how important missiles are , i have said this before we need to copy the iranis in our missiles force
And we are doing opposite of it , I remember reading somewhere that we have less then 2 digit number of Ghauris which could be entirely false (it was an artilcle somewhere)
 
Last edited:
we must now seriously need to work on HGV and produce them in numbers. After iran is down the next target is either turkey or pakistan. and those who still doubt it are the enemy of pakistan.
HGVs are not that easy , you need wind tunnel expertise and a large pool of engineers and Benjamins. increasing the numerical percentage of our missile is what we need cuz its in our budget.
 
Super not on topic but can i message someone seprately here? like one a mod did to tell me something ? is that funciton for normal members too?
 
HGVs are not that easy , you need wind tunnel expertise and a large pool of engineers and Benjamins. increasing the numerical percentage of our missile is what we need cuz its in our budget.
gaas kha lain but bana lein ab.. agli baari humari hai
 
For all those who are against subsonic cruise missiles that Pakistan mostly rely upon can see that how US employed its Tomahawk cruise missiles in the opening barrage of attack on Iran yesterday. These missiles flew through Iraq following the trajectory towards Iranian targets.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



We should all note how they didn't use supersonic missiles, no brahmos types

Their is good reason Pakistan has concentrated on Babur, Road, Fatah series

Although we should have solid supersonic and hypersonic options also
 
this is again a lesson from iran war how important missiles are , i have said this before we need to copy the iranis in our missiles force
Indeed, doesn't mean that we should not diversify our missile types. We should have all types, whether hypersonic, supersonic or subsonic cruise and ballistic missiles for each mission type.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top