Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


"Iranians hate the regime"

random Iranians literally yelling ALLAHU AKBAR together as they watch a downed drone crash to the ground
Click to expand...

Iranians are brave people. In my neighbour everyone give example of how Iran are different and brave from other muslim nations.

Sane people know Iranians majority of them dont hate iran regime.

Its just those 1% libetards.
 
Ali_Baba said:
Israel has 300 jets, and look at how much havoc they can create with that number.

400 modern jets backed by an effective IADs and base defence is a deterrence that you don't want to deal with period.
Click to expand...
I am wondering what Iranians were doing all those years? They had oil money, loyalty of Shia all around the world, even from Sunnis.
Why could they not buy Credible air defence, Cyber espionage or counter espionage, ELINT , SIGINT , Fighter jets...Or Just hire scientists from around the Muslims world, Pay them and build their own?

Now Iran is a sitting Duck after USA / Israel struck down their entire air defence, and hitting Missile sites at will.
 
Hakikat ve Hikmet said:
May be out of the place. The serious Turkish analysts are now crying for nuclear weapons (not the ones under the NATO command)....
Click to expand...

Türkiye wont be given the time or space to develop a bomb... They have left it too late. It takes a decade to make one, and alot of things happen in that time.
 
Khansaheeb

From deepseek, I was correct...

Yes, absolutely. A highly advanced spy ship (technically known as a Signal Intelligence or SIGINT vessel) is specifically designed to do exactly that. By getting close to its target, it can use its sophisticated sensors to intercept, analyze, and decipher an enemy's electronic warfare frequencies and tactics .
Here is a breakdown of how a modern spy ship accomplishes this mission.

🕵️ The Mission: SIGINT and Its Two Halves​

The core mission of these ships is Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) , which is divided into two main branches that work together to build a complete picture of an enemy's electronic capabilities :
  • COMINT (Communications Intelligence): This is the interception of voice or data communications between enemy units. By analyzing who is talking to whom, when, and on what frequencies, the ship can map out command structures and operational plans.
  • ELINT (Electronic Intelligence): This focuses on non-communication electronic signals, primarily from radars and other electronic warfare systems. This is where the "frequencies and tactics" come into play. By analyzing radar signals, the ship can determine:
    • Frequencies and Waveforms: The specific part of the spectrum the radar uses and the shape of its pulse .
    • Operational Parameters: Details like pulse width, repetition rate, and scan pattern .
    • Capabilities and Function: This analysis can reveal if a radar is for search, targeting, or fire control, and even identify the specific model of the system .

🔧 How a Spy Ship Does It: A Technical Toolbox​

A modern spy ship is essentially a floating, high-tech electronic laboratory. It uses a suite of advanced tools to make this happen.
  • Advanced Sensors and Antennas: These ships are covered with antennas of various shapes and sizes, often housed in distinctive radomes (the golf-ball-like structures). These are not just for receiving signals; they can precisely pinpoint the direction of an emitter using techniques like interferometry, with accuracy often better than 1° . Modern systems aim for full-spectrum coverage, from high-frequency communications to the highest bands of modern radars .
  • Powerful Signal Processing: Once a signal is intercepted, powerful computers get to work. They use sophisticated algorithms to analyze the signal. For example, the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) breaks the signal down into its frequency components, while more advanced methods like wavelet analysis and cyclostationary analysis can detect signals that are specifically designed to be hidden (Low Probability of Intercept/LPI signals) .
  • Real-Time Analysis and Intelligence Databases: The goal is to identify threats in real-time. Intercepted signals are compared against a pre-existing electronic warfare library—a vast database of known radar and communication "fingerprints." This allows the ship to instantly identify a threat, like a specific fire-control radar locking onto a friendly vessel . By continuously monitoring, the ship can also detect new, unknown signals and analyze them to understand new tactics or technologies .

📊 Capabilities in Action: A Summary​

To give you a sense of the scale and precision, here is a summary of what a state-of-the-art SIGINT vessel can do :


CapabilityTypical PerformanceTactical Value
Frequency Coverage2 GHz to 40 GHz (and extending up to 110 GHz) Can detect a vast range of military radars and communication links.
Simultaneous Tracking200+ emission sources Provides a comprehensive picture of a dense electromagnetic environment, like a naval battlegroup.
Directional AccuracyAzimuth error < 1° Allows for precise geolocation of enemy ships, aircraft, and ground-based radars.
Signal Analysis DepthMeasures pulse width, repetition frequency, modulation, scan pattern Enables identification of specific radar models (e.g., a targeting radar vs. a search radar) and their current mode of operation.
Database CreationContinuous logging of signal parameters Builds an "electronic order of battle" over time, revealing patterns, readiness, and new technologies.

🤔 The Challenges of Getting Close​

While immensely capable, this mission is not without its dangers and difficulties, which is why simply "getting close" is such a high-stakes gamble.
  • The "Spectrum Swamp": In areas like the Baltic or South China Sea, the electromagnetic spectrum is incredibly congested with civilian and military signals. The ship's systems must be able to filter through the "noise" to find the valuable military signals, a task that pushes processing power to its limits .
  • Physical Vulnerability: Spy ships are typically lightly armed or unarmed. In a time of peace, they operate under the rules of freedom of navigation, but in a crisis, their lack of armor and weapons makes them highly vulnerable. If detected closing in during a conflict, they would be a high-priority target .
  • Survivability and Stealth: To mitigate this risk, newer ships are being designed with stealth features to reduce their radar, infrared, and acoustic signatures, making them harder to detect in the first place .
In short, getting close is the entire point. It allows the ship's powerful sensors to overcome signal loss and intercept the faintest details of an enemy's electronic emissions, turning the invisible spectrum into a detailed intelligence report.
I hope this gives you a clear picture of how these fascinating ships operate. Would you be interested in learning more about some of the specific countermeasures enemy forces might use to try and hide their signals from these spy ships?
 
Dalit said:
Next time let's launch a nuke and take out Israel for eternity.
Click to expand...

lol no long range bomber, Missile or Aircraft carrier or forward base with that kind of a range. On top of that, they have Jordan & Egypt's protection from both sides. We don't even have a space launch system or space program, which is a necessary prerequisite to get into longer range missiles.

We have no way of Reaching Israel and neither do they have an (operational) way of reaching Pakistan (at least in a one-on-one fight).

This is what I keep reminding people whenever they complain about Pakistan not helping Palestinians. We can do nothing unless we invade 3 countries at least, to try to get close to them.
 
maxpane said:
If the UK, France, and Germany enter the war, that would mean four aircraft carriers, along with additional missiles and jets—leading to more attacks on Iran
Click to expand...

They probably won't join, if they decide to it will be to defend Israel from attack and may be the cucks of the GCC
 
Ali_Baba said:
People who say Iran does not need to invest in an airforce refuses to recognise that one of the reasons why Iran is in this position is because it has no airforce!
Click to expand...
Guys, please stop inventing the wheel, iranians do know that very well but they did not have ever credible opportunity in terms of potential supplier and credible offer, once they have it they will upgrade their fleet for sure.
 
Yesterday was bad today its not that bad - i am talking about main dubai city -

No booms or bangs or anything for a few hours now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 7 more.
    • Total: 246 (members: 49, guests: 197)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top