Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

onlinpunit said:
Without any type of Air Support or Air defence a large scale mobilization of ground forces will lead to nothing but slaughter. A war of attrition and blockage is the most viable option for Iran.
Click to expand...

I know but I wasn't talking about regular formations of Irani Army; I was thinking about smaller groups--many of them-- spread over time and area and carrying light weapons, especially projectiles--to march to the Israeli borders and did what Hezbollah was doing from Lebanon: Paralyze life in Israel. March into Iraq, add to their ranks in Iraq, march into Syria, Lebanon and even Jordan.
Just get close to the borders of Israel, dig into mountainside, riverine, wherever and fire and fire into Israel. This is already a Medieval War and so be Medieval!
 
Aggregate said:
No guarantees will ever, ever, ever be enough when it comes to US and israel. The day they end the war, they will block any transactions to Iranian banks, put back sanctions on Iran and start threatening Iran once again. Then the cycle will repeat for the 4th time.

Remember, these are the same two countries who were negotiating with Iran for weeks, so that in the background, they can gather the movements of Khamenei to launch an attack. They can never be trusted with any promises and they will find their way around any guarantees.

The only guarantee Iran can get .. and which will show the sincerity of US, will be to ask US to vacate its bases .. ask for end to War in Lebanon and Gaza and ask for end to West bank settlements.

Unless US agrees for these, they won't be sincere in anything else either.
Click to expand...


guarantees are compulsion of middle eastern states, otherwise, blockade will continue in one form or the other
 
KAL-EL said:
He truly does not understand the nature of NATO. NATO is a defensive organization not offensive. Iran did not attack the United States,
it was just the opposite so of course NATO wouldn't get involved. That's not what article 5 is meant to be
Click to expand...

So which act of aggression was done against a NATO country by Libya or Ukraine for NATO to be involved or even by the Gazans in the recent Israel-Gaza war? In all those instances, plenty of 'NATO' countries were involved without putting the 'NATO' label. And you know that.
 
Immortals said:
India getting ready to join the conflict?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


wow - now, that will be interesting if India does agree to this, esp with their gas supply levels.

It is all good to sign pacts to gain economic and military benefits, but less so when you have to provide what you promised.

Interesting times ahead.

India is within rage of Iran btw, certainly within Shahed range.

1774037762105.png

Within the terms of LEMOA, India can actually say no. It is on a case by case basis. India "does not" have to say yes. Lets see what Modi Sir does!!
 
Persian Gulf said:
Israel 16 days ago: "Tehran has only a few more days of firing capability left"

View attachment 187163

since then, Iran has consistently launched 10-15 MRBMs at Israel every day.
Click to expand...


zero practical value

zios have nothing to lose, IR has a downside bet not zios

zios survival guaranteed by all arab states

this is sad but it is true
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 4 more.
    • Total: 168 (members: 20, guests: 148)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top