Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was over 5M at Jask 8 days ago
Iran adjusts crude oil export layout, Jask inventory hits record high | Bitget News
⑴ According to the latest report from maritime intelligence company Kpler, despite the US bombing of military facilities at Iran's main oil terminal on Kha | Bitget crypto news!www.bitget.com
Iran has also reduced its reliance on Hormuz by operationalizing the Goreh-Jask pipelineand the Kooh Mobarak terminal as an alternative export route. The terminal has already loaded 2.01 million barrels of crude. One confirmed shipment involved the sanctioned VLCC DORE, which departed on March 8 following a 15-day AIS blackout. SAR imagery verified the vessel’s presence at the terminal prior to departure, and it is currently en route to Dalian carrying approximately 1.77 million barrels of crude
![]()
Iran War at Sea: Global Trade and Energy Disruptions
Shipping through Hormuz has collapsed, energy exports are disrupted, and global supply chains are under strain as the Iran war reshapes trade flows and markets.windward.ai
Something you have to realize is that Iran during Maximum Pressure campaign (2018-2022) + COVID, Iranian oil exports fell to below 250,000 barrels per day!
The country can survive (especially in war time) not exporting 2MBPD+ and doing half that! It’s a battle of time can the U.S. hold Kharg enough while the world economy crashes in flames at $150-200 a barrel oil? Especially with Russian oil also knocked off online the past few days?
My thoughts are Iran can more than likely outlast the U.S. in such a scenario.
They seem to be more or less, to borrow a video game term, have min-maxed what they know they can do. They know they can spray missiles and drones around, attack a multitude of targets, rely more on quantity rather than quality. Less emphasis on having a complete AD/AF, because they know those would get trashed early on in any conflict with the enemies they have. So stick to your strengths and ride it all out.Considering how IRGC seems have game theoried all possible outcomes (Tit-for-Tat strikes, Economical depletion of ABM/AD, A2/AD of S of H etc), I feel we might see some kind of Tit-for-Tat from them for any Island landing, instead of fighting enemy head on. I have seen all wars happening from Persian Gulf I and II, Yugoslavia, Afghan, Syria, Ukraine ... I have never seen the kind of asymmetric tactics IRGC deploys against superpowers, they always avoid the domain enemy puts in front of them and goes through some other route to inflict some other kind of pain or chokehold. Others I have listed had military but they tried to take the hyperpowers head on, challenging them at sea, air etc.
You are probably right.
The IRGC wont engage the Americans head on even if they somehow make a landing on an Iranian island.
I am thinking the Iranians taking out GCC’s power plants and desalination plants in retaliation. That will probably be the most logical step for IRGC.
Isn't that stupid little wall the big nose tribe uses there? Be funny if they blew that to bits with a cluster strikeWhat it is Iran aiming for in Jerusalem ? Knesset complex ? Or settlements ?
I don't think there's anything of significance there
First wave came just after the fall of Persian empire. They settled in modern Gujrat ( navsari) and then moved to other places Gradually.Who are the first wave and can you tell the difference? Is Tata (steel/autos) from first wave or second?
They certainly aren't aiming for it and it's right next to the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa mosque, also shrine of some Prophets.Isn't that stupid little wall the big nose tribe uses there? Be funny if they blew that to bits with a cluster strike
Finally the real nightmare is here.
Remember how people here ridiculed me when I said next time the US would most likely try a ground invasion too? Now it's likely here. Losing territory will be extremely painful. I hope it wouldn't happen. Let's just stay positive.
There is no catch as they left out of other military options, they need some sort of "victory", other speculations is that they would try to shift blame on iranians for continuation of war because this force will be opposed and targeted by everything Iran has, so in essence it is ill thought gambling event for further political narrative with possibilty to create new 9/11 narrative for USA to declare formal war on iranians which would provide them all political tools for mass mobilisation in america as false flags are spent resource.US ground troops on islands off the coast of Iran would be dangerous.
There could be a mass casualty event for the Americans if they come within such short range of Iranian drones and missiles.
Whats the catch here?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.