maverick
Trusted Member
yes they do. SLVs are easily converted to ICBMs. Iran has sent satellites using SLVs before.
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
yes they do. SLVs are easily converted to ICBMs. Iran has sent satellites using SLVs before.
r3alist
Elite Member
Bro, probably right, maybe I'm not so sure.
The best way I can say it, Iran has always been utterly ruthless and even within the power structures you have a west sympathetic faction, who would consider some sort of deal.
I would better say as long as the current Iran is the primary focus for Israel, as long as it maintains it's zeal and desire to fight and sacrifice..... And attack Israel then they will be the focus
If it decides one day to change, that it cannot incur more damage, instead it wants to rehabilitate and make compromises it could turn around and say different things to lots of Nations
kobra
Registered Member
No they dont.. ICBMs are of no use without nuclear warhead.. CEP is gonna be in Kms and US will treat it as nuclear threat and fire dozens of nukes at iran, even before interception begins, wiping out the civilization in literal terms. There is no possible means for Iran to hurt US mainland directly...
Iran's best chance to survive is build couple of small nukes and put Israil on extinction alert hence doctrine of MAD. US will back of. But its too late i guess.
Blain2
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
I will only address the last point since you took that pot-shot.
"being the beacon of peace" or whatever was specifically said was in the context of Trump's efforts to pull Pakistan-India back from the brink of a devastating war. Our government has a very specific view on his role in the context of our relations with India.
Second, you make hay while the sun shines for you. It is no different for your country Iran which also operates opportunistically as its national interests call. We can get more specific with Iran examples if you want but it will deviate the topic on hand.
Last edited:
Aggregate
Registered Member
Bro, we all want the world to be fair. but it isn't. You might have millions of people without power, nonstop attacks, desalination systems destroyed, large number of lives lost that could be saved if things don't escalate.
Iran is in a powerful position right now, it is hitting back everyone, but it cannot last for long. The missiles will run out at some point. The other side has unlimited alliances & resources. They can escalate to any levels they want.
Iran will leave with its nuclear program intact, missile program intact, Hormuz in control, a militarily respectful and powerful position, Iranians far more united than ever.
Iran too has bombed huge number of places, decimated Us bases and caused mayhem in israel, as well as to Western economies via shipping. After the current episode, US, Israel will rethink a hundred times before making such a mistake again. Its far better to leave at a position of power. Nobody knows where things might be, tomorrow.
and lets hope the tablets are viagra so Melania is at the receiving end not Iran or the rest of the freaking world
Immortals
Elite Member
A one sided defense treaty in exchange for money and oil to keep the lights on? What do you call that?
Does anyone here really think that traitor and U.S. cuck MBS would ever support Pakistan if Israel and India attack it? Even Trump said MBS has to kiss my ass.
Iran would support Pakistan much more in such an event than Saudi Arabia.
Relying on MBS is relying on a snake who is in bed with Zionists and Americans. He would sell Pakistan in a heartbeat if it meant he keeps his throne.
TAC
Registered Member
You really need to get off your high horse. Ofcoarse Pakistan has deep self interest in this war stopping but so has every other country in the world. Yet who else is working this hard to get both sides to agree to some sort of compromise? The compromise will not be ideal for either side but that is always the case, that’s why it’s called a compromise. Both sides have their demand list but how realistic are they! Mock Pakistan all you want, but if they somehow succeed how many innocent Iranian lives will they have saved aside from the billions in infrastructure damage? That is what you consistently mock? On a final point, given Iran’s historic closeness to India including aiding Indian terror activities in Pakistan via Iran, Pakistan didn’t owe shit to Iran. Throwing their full support behind UAE and Saudi Arabia instead would probably have been very lucrative but did they? which makes their efforts even more commendable. Meanwhile what are your Indian buddies doing to help you? Don’t be the drowning man who strikes out at the sole hand trying to help him.
I was so happy initially to hear that Pakistan was trying to facilitate peace but seeing this I am saddened as it shows stupidity. Iran must never open the straits for any period unless it is part of an overall deal. Very stupid Shabaz
sharreman10
Registered Member
To all my Pakistani brothers, let's be honest here. The only reason you think this ceasefire is a good deal is because your country is involved in this. No problem I would maybe feel the same as you. But from an Iranian POV I don't understand how you can take this. Please put yourself in our shoes.
I think what hes currently doing is worse than nothing.
kobra
Registered Member
Iran can do the funny thing... Iran should insist that PAF should go into pact with Iran like they did with Saudia so that after 15 days iF israil and US comes to attack, PAF will defend Iran haha..
Pakistan should play dumb here let them deal their on own.. Damn we do, damn we not.
Shags101
Trusted Member
Not trying to offend anyone but what will a two week truce solve nothing unless Iran decides to rollover to every demand without a permanent just solution they will repeat the attack with more vigor than before a truce only benefits those who can’t stop Irans attacks as they keep pretending they are still doing.
Starlord
Trusted Member
Is this why Modi jee called him Do-Lund Trump ? hahah
