Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

And Iran must be also preparing? Or don't you think that is the case ?
Prepare how? We only have missiles and drones. How many missiles do you think we have built after the ceasefire? 10? 20? What difference does it make in the bigger picture?

At least I hope we're moving our troops to the potential conflict zones in large numbers, but there's no report on that. Once the war starts again, we won't be able to move our troops in large numbers.
 
Marandi says that the Americans still have maximalist demands. Who could've thought, right?
 
That doesn’t make sense. It was seen leaving the PG, which means during the war it was INSIDE the PG likely Bahrain or Qatar where it was docked.

Unless you are implying it entered the PG then did a U turn and left the same day.
My point is, it could be anything.

Maybe Iran did target it, and air defenses stopped the attacks effectively?

Maybe Iran didn't have a reason to attack it?

Maybe Iran thought it wasn't a good idea?

Maybe Iran did want to attack it, and was preparing, but then the ceasefire happened?

There's a multitude of reasons.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

But, but, but Chump said the Air force is gone? LOL!!!
 
He is sure to ruin India's UAE policy in the long run.
UAE in a 100 years will become United Pajeetistan. The Emirati cucks will give their daughters to hindutvadis and it will become a nation of head bobbers.
 
Marandi says that the Americans still have maximalist demands. Who could've thought, right?

Negotiations always start with maximalist demands from all sides. Parties eventually come down to do-ables. Unless they just cannot find a breakthrough. Vance has come all the way from the US. He would prefer not to go empty-handed, nor should Trump want that. Fingers crossed.
 
Prepare how? We only have missiles and drones. How many missiles do you think we have built after the ceasefire? 10? 20? What difference does it make in the bigger picture?
At least I hope we're moving our troops to the potential conflict zones in large numbers, but there's no report on that. Once the war starts again, we won't be able to move our troops in large numbers.

Saw some news outlet today which said Iran still possesses a large number of missiles.

Also, going to the de-mining of the Strait of Hormuz, I didn't know Iran has yet mined much--maybe some mines to narrow the channels even more; it is quite a narrow channel which is navigable and Iran is forcing the passing ships to pass closer to Iran now--after extracting the toll charges! But even if the Strait is totally de-mined, which vessel's captain is going to risk taking his ship when the Iranian missiles or the drones can strike from deep within Iran? One hit and the Strait is closed again!
 

UAE–Pakistan rift sharpens as Iran war exposes fault lines​



Pakistan to return $3.5bn UAE debt before month end: official




>> The UAE have become a lost people, hope something changes for them in the future so that they can see some common sense.

Saudis... if these statelets are source of instability, war, export of terror and import of foreign power as leverage to maintain them... then it is only Saudis that should bring an end to this... control their foreign policy, allocation of resources. They should not be allowed an equal table or outlet... providing them a perch and amplifier.
Second, a toll booth on the straits by Iran will also put a bridle or restraint on their impunity. Access control is a matter of national security for Iran and these statelets cannot be allowed to undermine that...

Both of these will bode well for all in land ... Saudis and Iraqis. A future mechanism or council between Iraq, Saudi, Iran and Oman can start managing the affairs and security mutually.
 
Negotiations always start with maximalist demands from all sides. Parties eventually come down to do-ables. Unless they just cannot find a breakthrough. Vance has come all the way from the US. He would prefer not to go empty-handed, nor should Trump want that. Fingers crossed.
Vance will surely have 2028 elections in mind…. This will be a medal for him for support back home in next election… USA populace is fed up of wars and dying for pisserlis
 
But even if the Strait is totally de-mined, which vessel's captain is going to risk taking his ship when the Iranian missiles or the drones can strike from deep within Iran? One hit and the Strait is closed again!

Exactly there is no going back... Iran barely even used any cruise or anti ship missiles with effective ranges that cover the whole of the Gulf. Any ship inside is effectively hostage.
Which is why bringing a coalition of 30 or 50 nations cannot undo.
It is checkmate!
 
Saudis... if these statelets are source of instability, war, export of terror and import of foreign power as leverage to maintain them... then it is only Saudis that should bring an end to this... control their foreign policy, allocation of resources. They should not be allowed an equal table or outlet... providing them a perch and amplifier.
Second, a toll booth on the straits by Iran will also put a bridle or restraint on their impunity. Access control is a matter of national security for Iran and these statelets cannot be allowed to undermine that...

Both of these will bode well for all in land ... Saudis and Iraqis. A future mechanism or council between Iraq, Saudi, Iran and Oman can start managing the affairs and security mutually.
Saudia and Pakistan should mount a joint invasion of UAE and be done with it.

Who is gonna help them? Pissraelis or Indian dogs?
 
Exactly there is no going back... Iran barely even used any cruise or anti ship missiles with effective ranges that cover the whole of the Gulf. Any ship inside is effectively hostage.
Which is why bringing a coalition of 30 or 50 nations cannot undo.
It is checkmate!
Iran doesn't have much cruise missiles, because they are easily trackable given the open air space in persian gulf. They focused primarily on simple ballistic missiles.....because by their inherent nature of working physics, Ballistic missiles go terminal at high speed which gives them the best chance at ploughing through the air defenses.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Trump wants joint control with the Ayatollah

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


US is there for the minnows... the statelets with deep pockets. I don't think any US presence in the region is good for future stability. As US will remain the only one to coerce or sabotage any effective peace in the region... but most likely to undermine it for the benefit of zion.

It should be unwelcome by all regional stakeholders.... including Pakistan. Who gets to benefit the most by changing the regional order.
 
Iran doesn't have much cruise missiles, because they are easily trackable given the open air space in persian gulf. They focused primarily on simple ballistic missiles.....because by their inherent nature of working physics, Ballistic missiles go terminal at high speed which gives them the best chance at ploughing through the air defenses.

Their effectiveness increases with saturation paired with other systems as they're more precise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top