Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, evil Iran and poor Israel, don't leave any chance to criticize IranHi,
Iran should have never planned attack on Israel thru Hamas---period.
Iranian proxy killed 2500 istraelis---. Israel killed over a 100K muslims in Gaza---destroyed the whole city---decimated iranian military assets---killed all their leadership and has not stopped yet---.
As for as No Korea---I have told you guys many a times---it is not going to be hurt---. It is going to be a future evengelical christian nation.

theprint.in
He is not wrong Hamas got played right into Israel hands on October 7th and gave them a reason to mass murder.Yeah, evil Iran and poor Israel, don't leave any chance to criticize Iran
What, you expect China to go to war with US on these occasions ? Unrealistic. China won't get into war with US unless it is absolutely necessary like its existential is involved and there are no other ways around. Venezuela and Iran are not China's core interests, and I wouldn't even classify them as China's allies in strategic or military sense.
Hi,
Iran should have never planned attack on Israel thru Hamas---period.
Iranian proxy killed 2500 istraelis---. Israel killed over a 100K muslims in Gaza---destroyed the whole city---decimated iranian military assets---killed all their leadership and has not stopped yet---.
As for as No Korea---I have told you guys many a times---it is not going to be hurt---. It is going to be a future evengelical christian nation.
Yes, China is not a bystander in this war. But, short of going to war with US that China takes cautiously, I am sure it is providing assistance including military ones to Iran to not let it fall under US/Israel attacks. Certainly, China doesn't want US hegemony in the world. If Iran wants more profound help from China in war or conflict situations, then it first has to develop close collaborative strategic relation esp in military with China just like Pakistan. But, I think Iran will prefer Russia as its foremost strategic partner esp in military sense simply because of their geopolitics(includes geographical proximity) and past military cooperation history.I wouldn't say that it is not related to China's core interest, or China is completely bystander.
China is ready to confront any potential war that could be instigated by the US or its proxy allies.
China will certainly not allow Iran to fall into the hand of the US since Iran didn't betray China this time.
I am not at all defending our leadership, just criticizing the prima facie absurdity of Araghchi's tweet. At 6 a.m., after 21-hour long meeting, J.D. Vance came out and said we couldn't resolve differences over making nukes. If Araghchi is so concerned that that is a misrepresentation of Iran's position, he could have quickly called a press conference of his own and said there is a misunderstanding - we are absolutely and entirely abjuring any desire to make nuclear weapons. Imagine what a kick in the face of J.D. and U.S. it would have been. Instead of that, the Iran team did not even make a press statement and resorted to make snide comments on twitter. Who looks more credible? J.D. making a 2-minute statement to the whole world right after the meeting has failed or Arghchi making bad tweets next day?Stop defending our compromised leadership. They really can't make a deal because of Israel pressure. I don't think Iran has a problem not making nuclear weapons they tried to sign that treaty multiple times now, but us leadership fails to ensure security and resolution of this conflict. I understand that our nationalistic sentiment drives us to think how we think, but reality is that we have moved the goal post every time a deal is about to be made... and that is the pressure applied by Israel.
I believe from Ararghchi it looks clear they need clear commitments from usa to find closure to this conflict. We just do not have that capability to provide that assurance. In my opinion JD did not offer any clarity in terms of what US is looking for as assurance from Iran.I am not at all defending our leadership, just criticizing the prima facie absurdity of Araghchi's tweet. At 6 a.m., after 21-hour long meeting, J.D. Vance came out and said we couldn't resolve differences over making nukes. If Araghchi is so concerned that that is a misrepresentation of Iran's position, he could have quickly called a press conference of his own and said there is a misunderstanding - we are absolutely and entirely abjuring any desire to make nuclear weapons. Imagine what a kick in the face of J.D. and U.S. it would have been. Instead of that, the Iran team did not even make a press statement and resorted to make snide comments on twitter. Who looks more credible? J.D. making a 2-minute statement to the whole world right after the meeting has failed or Arghchi making bad tweets next day?
hamas issue is complicated. It is true that it was a terrible mistake that is on the boundries of treason(or compromised leadership) to start a war with rockets and rpgs that is doomed to be lost to isreal. However current hamas and at 2023 as well is much closer to gcc like it is financed by qatar and it has supported the Syria revolution in 2024. 2023 attacks was financed and triggered through gcc(which means usa) more than by Iran.He is not wrong Hamas got played right into Israel hands on October 7th and gave them a reason to mass murder.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.