Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

[Samurai]

This video came up on some Arabic channel. If this is true then that means Fatah series probably Fatah-I and Fatah-II are in Saudi Arabia.

Also hypothetically, if Pakistan military unit is stationed lets say in eastern Saudi Arabia, then how near to Israel can Fatah series be deployed to cover parts of Israel under its striking range?

"Pakistan transfers surface-to-surface missiles to the Gulf | Industries"

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[TallGuy]

So those guys who have been putting out things right of their asses deserve to be atleasted scolded.
@TallGuy have some shame, at least check your source before spewing shit.

@Panzerkiel
???

i thought i was clear as daylight? Sirsa /Hisar and Barnala C2 (IACCS) were targeted in conflict what are you trying?

So the question is?
Did we attempt a strike on Hisar military airport/Sirsa AFB and Barnala IACCS C2 ? yes or no?

if yes then what did we use then if it was not GIDS Fattah 2 ER-GMRLS

You are saying we use something else then with what?
YIHYA III Drones?
if not drones then that will fuel rumors which Indians were claiming shaheen BMs were launched in those days.

@falcon34
i have zero credibility! please ignore me!

 

[Panzerkiel]

@Panzerkiel
???

i thought i was clear as daylight? Sirsa /Hisar and Barnala C2 (IACCS) were targeted in conflict what are you trying?

So the question is?
Did we attempt a strike on Hisar military airport/Sirsa AFB and Barnala IACCS C2 ? yes or no?

if yes then what did we use then if it was not GIDS Fattah 2 ER-GMRLS

You are saying we use something else then with what?
YIHYA III Drones?
if not drones then that will fuel rumors which Indians were claiming shaheen BMs were launched in those days.

@falcon34
i have zero credibility! please ignore me!

Neither It was F2 nor Shaheen....

 

[Oscar]

@Panzerkiel
???

i thought i was clear as daylight? Sirsa /Hisar and Barnala C2 (IACCS) were targeted in conflict what are you trying?

So the question is?
Did we attempt a strike on Hisar military airport/Sirsa AFB and Barnala IACCS C2 ? yes or no?

if yes then what did we use then if it was not GIDS Fattah 2 ER-GMRLS

You are saying we use something else then with what?
YIHYA III Drones?
if not drones then that will fuel rumors which Indians were claiming shaheen BMs were launched in those days.

@falcon34
i have zero credibility! please ignore me!

F2 was likely not deployed - F1 was .
You dont need F2 for Barnala - please see faint red range for system at edge of border -


For Sirsa:


Should be clear that for both targets you do not need to be even close at border and can be behind E74 Longitude to hit them comfortably.

 

[Oscar]

In case you do want to get a better idea of F2 - and you can guess where I put it

 

[PakFactor]

They were also used "afterthought" against more in depth targets in terms of responses and not as part of overall offensive plans which relied heavily on PAF for that effort(which showed its own limitations from weapons effectiveness).

I might get chewed out for saying this. What you stated could be the reason the cease-fire was almost immediate, and would lend some credence to Indian claims that it wasn't them but Pakistan.

 

[Oscar]

I might get chewed out for saying this. What you stated could be the reason the cease-fire was almost immediate, and would lend some credence to Indian claims that it wasn't them but Pakistan.

Pakistan wasnt asking for a ceasefire - primarily because it was seeing the escalation ladder go faster than expected and while weapons and plans are readily available - the economy to recover from anything "X" beyond what May 25 was does not exist.

You can deploy all weapons, fight for 3 weeks but then your people suffer in a much more pronounced fashion than India's due to proximity of nearly all population centers to border and then also makes them severely vulnerable to what the Indians have cooking in Afg with the animals there.

So the term isnt so much as asking for a ceasefire but Pakistan conveying what it feels will happen in the next 2 weeks if the international community does not intervene and why it wont hold back -

If you want to construe letting the world know "we might have to blow them (and them us) up which is likely to destroy the world as well" as asking for ceasefire - then sure - you can let those nutjob Indians have their cake.

 

[Raja Porus]

You are right. No F2 was used.

DG ISPR admitted their use and quite forcefully in my case

 

[side-winder]

F2 was likely not deployed - F1 was .
You dont need F2 for Barnala - please see faint red range for system at edge of border -
View attachment 192915

For Sirsa:
View attachment 192916

Should be clear that for both targets you do not need to be even close at border and can be behind E74 Longitude to hit them comfortably.

Can't say for Fatahs for sure. But both were targeted by PAF.

Sirsa at around 0730 hrs by JF-17.

 

[maxpane]

Can't say for Fatahs for sure. But both were targeted by PAF.

Sirsa at around 0730 hrs by JF-17.

so jf 17 mostly unsung hero in 2025 . we underestimated its role. i dbt know about other but i certainly underestimated thunders

 

[Oscar]

Can't say for Fatahs for sure. But both were targeted by PAF.

Sirsa at around 0730 hrs by JF-17.

My point there is that F1 has sufficient range to hit those targets.
F2 could be used for other targets.

 

[Maarkhoor]

My point there is that F1 has sufficient range to hit those targets.
F2 could be used for other targets.

I heard during the conflict by Indian defense analyst that Pakistan have fired very high speed missiles, did this indicate that these F1 or F2 are hypersonic?

Plus I see a video clip where Indian channel shows a crater radios more than 10 meters and deep like 5 to 7 and I don't think so F1 can create such massive crater, some suggests this crater was done by S1.

I am searching this video once found i will post here.

 

[Princeps]

I heard during the conflict by Indian defense analyst that Pakistan have fired very high speed missiles, did this indicate that these F1 or F2 are hypersonic?

Plus I see a video clip where Indian channel shows a crater radios more than 10 meters and deep like 5 to 7 and I don't think so F1 can create such massive crater, some suggests this crater was done by S1.

I am searching this video once found i will post here.

air-launched , cm400

 

[Maarkhoor]

air-launched , cm400

Sorry bro that big crater can't be caused by launched anti radiation missile it must be a B.M with a warhead approx 500 to 1000 KGS H.E.

I am searching that video released during the conflict once you see you can understand what I am talking about.

It was hardened surface probably a road or runway and air launch missile can't do such huge damage.

 

[air marshal]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies