Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's a teacher. It's one thing to plan it and look good in your mind than carrying out.The so-called "Shooter"... what a L0SER.
Not only did he not achieve anything - other than getting caught.
This image of him on the floor is gonna be him for the rest of life after showering with the Boys.
View attachment 194111
I am discussing this matter, what right do you have to judge a person's freedom of speech?It did not happen in the White House. It happened at the White House Correspondent's Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel.
Your Point #1 has validity outside of the dictatorship crap. The rest are pure silliness. Stop it.
Shooter is alive...."for now." He doesn't look white either.![]()
I remember President Putin visiting Vietnam.Nothing special
That’s the US system, the president is always exposed to the public. It’s not like Putin’s political system where he hides in bunker all day.
Adding to the fact gun is allowed, then it can happen anytime.

I'm sure lots of us would remember his name if he succeeded..Yawn!! This will be forgotten quickly. What was the name of the previous Trump shooter ? Yeah I cannot remember either.
You can see on the photo Trump stands very exposed in public. The US secret service can never protect him against potential sniper on building roof or window.I remember President Putin visiting Vietnam.
Is Vietnam a bunker?
This photo was taken during Trump's birthday military parade; is this kind of situation exposed to the public?
View attachment 194115
Odd. Last time I was in the UK, happened to be in the right place at the right time to witness the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham. Was able to chat with a couple of the London police officers. One was armed with an MP-5 in .40S&W. The other was armed with a Glock 22 in .40S&W.
Perhaps the English lady you observed is misinformed.
Actually -- yes.I am discussing this matter, what right do you have to judge a person's freedom of speech?
You may disagree with someone else's views, but is criticizing someone's speech a habit unique to the United States?
Actually -- yes.
Criticizing speech, in other words, challenging someone's opinions, is free speech. And it is unique to the US in the sense that it is legally protected. I guess that as a Chinese citizen, having your own speech challenged is a strange experience?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.