Beijingwalker
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #46
Conflicts are still going on in 2026. and they claim Maoists are dead. lol, I really wish they could make a better lie next time.That is some propaganda.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conflicts are still going on in 2026. and they claim Maoists are dead. lol, I really wish they could make a better lie next time.That is some propaganda.
This is the reality mate. Bihar, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh were the hotspots in the 90s. See the recent news. A year ago 1k of them were surrounded on one single hill by 20k troops. Most of them surrendered.That is some propaganda.
Conflicts are still going on in 2026. and they claim Maoists are dead. lol, I really wish they could make a better lie next time.
This is the reality mate. Bihar, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh were the hotspots in the 90s. See the recent news. A year ago 10k of them were surrounded on one single hill by 100k troops. Most of them surrendered.
The leaders are dead and cadres don't have any interest in continuing the warfare. The ideology is dead in India, you can argue whatsoever but this is the truth.
My bad, the number was 1000 surrounded by 20k troops.How come you claim there are 10 thousands of them on a single hill yet the insurgency is dead? How do these tens of thousands get recruited if ideology is dead? Your Indian truth baffles me.
We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.India-China war seems inevitable. India's challenge to One China policy is an existential threat to China.
M
My bad, the number was 1000 surrounded by 20k troops.
Peak insurgency figures seem to be around 20-30k in 90s.
Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.
We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.
I mean weapons and equipments, as for troops deployment, we can get them there in a matter of hours.Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.
Not really. There is no ideological base for it now.These insurgencies will gather pace again once the steam runs out of the Indian economy.
You cannot sustain the economic growth in current geopolitical environment.
Everyone misses the 90s already.
We prefer to use long-range fire, which is our advantage. We will not use the precious lives of our soldiers to engage in close combat with India.Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.
You are just incredible, Dalai Lama was on CIA payroll is known fact now and are you denying India hosting "the Tibetan exile government"? Really, if China hosted an "exile government" of an India state, what would India think?
India claims to have liberated the country from the British colonizers, but it has always used a line illegally drawn by the British colonizers to claim Chinese territory.
India uses a line drawn by the British to claim Chinese territory, so I believe it would be more appropriate to use the Ganges River as the China-India border. This line is called the 'Gao Zhikai Line.' McMahon was not a person from the involved countries, so what right did he have to interfere with Chinese territory?
We have always regarded India as an enemy. Now, India no longer has the qualification to be considered an enemy.
If a war occurs in the South China Sea and India gets involved, the Western Theater Command will, like in 1962, completely destroy the Indian invasion forces.
We have no interest in ruling India. No normal person would want to live in a cesspool.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.