The Dalai Lama's Flight to India

That is some propaganda.
This is the reality mate. Bihar, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh were the hotspots in the 90s. See the recent news. A year ago 1k of them were surrounded on one single hill by 20k troops. Most of them surrendered.

The leaders are dead and cadres don't have any interest in continuing the warfare. The ideology is dead in India, you can argue whatsoever but this is the truth.
 
Last edited:
Conflicts are still going on in 2026. and they claim Maoists are dead. lol, I really wish they could make a better lie next time.

Indian government aims to manage the conflict by undertaking huge demographic changes within the country.

The conflict may not be dead but it is transitioning and evolving.

Maybe soon you would have the chance to host a Maoist Governate in Exile. Would you take it?
 
This is the reality mate. Bihar, Jharkhand and Chattisgarh were the hotspots in the 90s. See the recent news. A year ago 10k of them were surrounded on one single hill by 100k troops. Most of them surrendered.

The leaders are dead and cadres don't have any interest in continuing the warfare. The ideology is dead in India, you can argue whatsoever but this is the truth.

How come you claim there are 10 thousands of them on a single hill yet the insurgency is dead? How do these tens of thousands get recruited if ideology is dead? Your Indian truth baffles me.
 
How come you claim there are 10 thousands of them on a single hill yet the insurgency is dead? How do these tens of thousands get recruited if ideology is dead? Your Indian truth baffles me.
My bad, the number was 1000 surrounded by 20k troops.

Peak insurgency figures seem to be around 20-30k in 90s. It used to be a big thing back then.

Kind of having a brainfuck moment due to an assignment deadline today, Turnitin AI detection has gotten crazy good lately.
 
Last edited:
India-China war seems inevitable. India's challenge to One China policy is an existential threat to China.
We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.

china-counters-indias-rafale-with-stealth-jet-deployment-v0-cPVDFXcIEuXtnPYk9EglNn5A8ACkxHKXFH_LpCkYca8.jpg
 
Last edited:
M

My bad, the number was 1000 surrounded by 20k troops.

Peak insurgency figures seem to be around 20-30k in 90s.

These insurgencies will gather pace again once the steam runs out of the Indian economy.

You cannot sustain the economic growth in current geopolitical environment.

Everyone misses the 90s already.
 
We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.
Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.
 
We built tons of transportation and logistic infrastructure along the border regions, deployed best military equipments there, we are better prepared and enjoy both numerical and quality advantage against our enemy.

India enjoys easier access to hotspots like Tibet compared to China. That's why other hotspots like the chicken neck matter where India is moving massive machinery and personell.
 
Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.
I mean weapons and equipments, as for troops deployment, we can get them there in a matter of hours.
 
These insurgencies will gather pace again once the steam runs out of the Indian economy.

You cannot sustain the economic growth in current geopolitical environment.

Everyone misses the 90s already.
Not really. There is no ideological base for it now.

Economic growth point I would disgress. But this is not the accurate thread for it.

No one misses the 90s atleast here in India. Liberalisation came late in the 90s to us it should've been sooner.

But socialism did have it's benefits, India's national PSUs and companies could stand up against foreign companies due to that same national socialist period.
 
India claims to have liberated the country from the British colonizers, but it has always used a line illegally drawn by the British colonizers to claim Chinese territory.

India uses a line drawn by the British to claim Chinese territory, so I believe it would be more appropriate to use the Ganges River as the China-India border. This line is called the 'Gao Zhikai Line.' McMahon was not a person from the involved countries, so what right did he have to interfere with Chinese territory?

We have always regarded India as an enemy. Now, India no longer has the qualification to be considered an enemy.

If a war occurs in the South China Sea and India gets involved, the Western Theater Command will, like in 1962, completely destroy the Indian invasion forces.

We have no interest in ruling India. No normal person would want to live in a cesspool.
 
Actually, they have huge numerical advantages in their adjacent region compared to PLA in Tibet. But, no worry, China can transport mass number of troops and weapons in no time and crush them.
We prefer to use long-range fire, which is our advantage. We will not use the precious lives of our soldiers to engage in close combat with India.

When air supremacy and fire strikes are obtained, the army will enter the illegally occupied land of India and completely solve these problems.
 
You are just incredible, Dalai Lama was on CIA payroll is known fact now and are you denying India hosting "the Tibetan exile government"? Really, if China hosted an "exile government" of an India state, what would India think?

So CIA told you guys that they have Dalai Lama on their payroll or was it one of your commie friends?

Why don't you present proof of this supposed government in Exile?
 
India claims to have liberated the country from the British colonizers, but it has always used a line illegally drawn by the British colonizers to claim Chinese territory.

India uses a line drawn by the British to claim Chinese territory, so I believe it would be more appropriate to use the Ganges River as the China-India border. This line is called the 'Gao Zhikai Line.' McMahon was not a person from the involved countries, so what right did he have to interfere with Chinese territory?

We have always regarded India as an enemy. Now, India no longer has the qualification to be considered an enemy.

If a war occurs in the South China Sea and India gets involved, the Western Theater Command will, like in 1962, completely destroy the Indian invasion forces.

We have no interest in ruling India. No normal person would want to live in a cesspool.

Doesn't Pakistan use the line drawn by Britishers as their border? Do you know what Durand line is ?

Do you also dispute the validity of Durand line, since it was drawn by British?

Do you know what successor states are?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top