Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

[Maarkhoor]

things from my understanding is that
This is a new TEL and has the khaki camo also we can see the command and control cabin open too .
There is a lot of confusion regarding F2/F3 and the PA is trying to decrease the distantce between the twos design , this is deffo the elongated f2 cuz you can make out the finsof the original f2 from this one (tho looks similar to f3 from afar)
View attachment 194583
The people thier seems to be viewing new caps , similar to the abdali test

Abdali using casing of miraging steel while F1 and FII uses other skins less expensive and more durable for more speed less weight.

 

[Broghil]

 

[Taimoor]

Issue is we require 1200-1400km Range ALBM to be effective for that we need a platform,

we have none!

Situation in Geographical point of view is very different from lets say current conflict in Middle East.

I had a discussion with somebody, and he has placed lot of praise on PRF when i asked regarding the equipment inducted, he said Fattah 1/2 Rockets, Fattah 4 Tactical LACM and Fattah 3 (SSCM) are more than enough in inflict from Pakistani border till 400km everything will be accurately targeted.

Indian IADS is good they are upgrading but geography plays its tricks. that is why last year they had concentrated there IADS near HV targets. other areas were relatively very lightly defended.

Our problem is more to do the effectiveness of our warheads. Do we have anything remotely as destructive in conventional domain?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

One missile, one warhead, utter destruction.

TBH, I am not sure what Army high ups are smoking, the effectiveness of Fattah has been at best "hizbullah level" destruction. Army really needs to up its game. For heavy lifting, we rely on PAF far too much.

 

[Bilal]

things from my understanding is that
This is a new TEL and has the khaki camo also we can see the command and control cabin open too .
There is a lot of confusion regarding F2/F3 and the PA is trying to decrease the distantce between the twos design , this is deffo the elongated f2 cuz you can make out the finsof the original f2 from this one (tho looks similar to f3 from afar)
View attachment 194583
The people thier seems to be viewing new caps , similar to the abdali test

Don’t know, but I still believe in the theory that F3 is a localized HD-1, CM302 or YJ18 derivative. Because I want to believe it, lol.

 

[Maarkhoor]

yes , the big thing is that this had the warhead

View attachment 194582

No B.M missile (Long Range MRLS) fire at its max when fired as test so the unspent solid fuel make some king of explosion.

 

[falcon34]

First time tested with a live warhead?

This tells u how bad the situation is on the eastern border, even during excerises Indus shield last year they didn't do any live warhead tests. Looks like we are in for another round

 

[kimjongun]

Bhai I am not challenging you but as am stating the fact that NDC and others developing B.M and other systems decided not to test missile with live warheads since an incident @Oscar may explain it further when deliberately or un-deliberately our Ghuari missile with live warhead land in Iran.

what when did we landed a ghauri in iran?
Kher bhai , Solid rocket propellent is very hard to explode on impact , this is a safety measure to ensure the missile doesnt go haywire , on falling during loading , secondly SRM are made to empty themselves and since they burn outwards(towards the case) leaving the theory of unburnt rocket fuel not making sense , also plz explain me this

 

[kimjongun]

View attachment 194585

 

[Toxic]

this looks fast. is it me or every launch missile move with that type of speed

mach 2 terminal I believe.

 

[bravo_1]

Love this TEL and camo:

 

[Maarkhoor]

what when did we landed a ghauri in iran?
Kher bhai , Solid rocket propellent is very hard to explode on impact , this is a safety measure to ensure the missile doesnt go haywire , on falling during loading , secondly SRM are made to empty themselves and since they burn outwards(towards the case) leaving the theory of unburnt rocket fuel not making sense , also plz explain me this
View attachment 194586View attachment 194587

 

[Taimoor]

First time tested with a live warhead?

God help us if this is what they can muster up with the warhead destructive power.

 

[falcon34]

@Panzerkiel
Was it live warhead?

 

[falcon34]

God help us if this is what they can muster up with the warhead destructive power.

It's enough to destroy it's intended target you r seeing the explosion from almost 500 metres away the fire ball it self was about 20-30metres if consider the distance between the outer circles to be 40 metres. It's a wide angle shot.

 

[Aziqbal]

So many tests recently

What’s up