Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there any difference in killing people with bullets, cannons, bombs, bayonets, poisonous chemical gases, biological warfare, burying alive, or nukes ? None. The Japs had used all the above savage methods except nukes to kill over 25 million Chinese and 45 million Asians and yet the two nukes dropped on Japan only killed about 200 K Japs. And now, you and Japs are telling the world the 2 nukes are just too inhumane and cruel and each year the Japs have these disgusting 2 commemorations to mark the droppings of 2 nukes as if those Japs are the only real victims of WW II. Give me a break. A correction, China needs to drop at least 10 nukes on the islands next time when they try to wage wars again and they will, trust me. The Japanese will never have the same heats as other East Asians and Japan will not even be on the same pages as other greater East Asian countries too, they only want to align with white US and NATO.You are crazy. Unless they start the war, or of some sorts, threatening China with every existence, there is no justification.
China should care less about moral high ground of against nuclear proliferation since they don't care at all, China should not be tied to moral baggage that it will not first use nukes too. What China should care is parity(doesn't mean exact same number but parity in power) and effective nuke deterrence strategy against possible US military adventurism on China.
You are crazy. Unless they start the war, or of some sorts, threatening China with every existence, there is no justification.
No worry, we are realistic people. he will not dispatch US warships on a suicide mission.This man gonna be a perfect scapegoat if he attempts to provoke China too much.
No worry, we are realistic people. he will not dispatch US warships on a suicide mission.
China is a military monster. He knows it. Sending warships to the Pacific is another level than to the Arabia seas.
But at the end it’s Trump that decides. he can give advice, but ultimately he is a soldier he has to follow the orders of any US president.
Except I don't agree with Chinese FM spoke person in the article stating and sympathizing that the "innocent" Japanese people suffered greatly in WW II too. They are all ba******.You are crazy. Unless they start the war, or of some sorts, threatening China with every existence, there is no justification.
A war with China will not happen anytime soon. Yes, there is a risk around Taiwan, and if breaking out every country may be involved.The problem is that Trump is running out of card against China, and his white nationalist ego cannot allow China to become dominant in everything.
And Trump and his gang love to use Asian nations or Asians as cannon fodders against China. Since Taiwan is too small to do any harm, then they gonna pick Japan to do this dirty job, and an East Asian man as the secretary of the USN.
They might even realize China cannot even be defeated by a nuclear war or getting harmed by Japan, they gonna ask Japan to place its missile launch sites near the hospital/elementary schools/kindergartens.
They gonna choose to sacrifice Japan, and hope to ruin China's reputation of doing genocidal scorched land attacks against the Japanese civilians.
And the scapegoat gonna be the Vietnamese born secretary of navy.
They love to use Asians as hostage against China.
The leaders from CCP are smart, and they have immediately recognized this kind of playbook by appointing an Asian man to lead the navy, and suddenly give Japan so much spotlight. This ain't good.
The whites are never going to treat Asians well, unless asking them to become its expendable pawns for the dirty job.
A war with China will not happen anytime soon. Yes, there is a risk around Taiwan, and if breaking out every country may be involved.
But that possibility is slim because the math doesn’t add up. The US military will become overstretched by 2 or 3 fronts war. The US had 100+ aircraft carriers during WW2, 20 aircraft carriers during Vietnam war, today just 11. That’s too little for a military superpower.
And even if the Congress approves $1.5 trillion annual military spending, the US would need at least 10-15 years to be ready.
Let not come down to a nuclear exchange you know everyone will perish, including the winner.
Let fight a conventional war
5-10 years? Did he say that? probably too early to tell. China is still relying too much on western technology imports.According to Marco Rubio, giving China another 5-10 years, the US will become irrelevant in front of China.
China's technology and manufacturing capability will keep growing exponentially in the coming decade, and the US has recognized this fact.
By supporting Vietnam to counter balance against China's manufacturing prowess will do nothing because Vietnam has its supply chain being completely intertwined with China.
The US is getting absolutely desperate if they are ready to sacrifice Japan + the entire Asia-Pacific by just trying to slow China down.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.