Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[kimjongun]

Baat nahi maantay tum larkay. I have been at Sukkur radar site.

It's this site in Lahore.

View attachment 196281

it is lahore the green blob just behind the concrete square shaped matches with the HUD imagery

 

[Toxic]

You are right, this is a better match, you got the coordinates?

 

[kimjongun]

View attachment 196282

View attachment 196283

wese the radar tower is empty

 

[Tomcats]

Got the coordinates, yes its the HUD for the Lahore radar site instead.
The pad has the radar on it, and the control cabin is situated behind it.
31°34'13.3"N 74°27'45.7"E

 

[nervouscar]

Is there any human cost inflicted on hindustani like they killed children and women telling any story OR we as nation happy to trade human lives with jets that cost pennies to indians.

 

[hasssanali8998]

Is there any human cost inflicted on hindustan like they killed children and women telling any story OR we as nation happy to trade human lives with jets that cost pennies to indians.

sh15s did that dw

 

[side-winder]

India has come up with Imagery and HUD footage. Granted for sites like Chunian and Arifwala the satellite imagery does not show conclusive damage, but pairing that with HUD footage make me more inclined to believe them in the absence of any denials/debunking attempts by ISPR.

I see, this does look like a better match, can you send the coordinates?

The imagery which only shows the shadows of radar. Chunian has already been debunked by Google Earth itself.

None of the footage shows the impact - People shot those drones with G3s and MGs at radar sites in the absence of counter UAS systems.

There was minor damage at 2 sites - rest all is just piss pathetic BDA by IAF.

 

[kimjongun]

IMO the Fatah 5 will not come for some time...
There was another member which hinted towards even a bigger thing and we should not get too exited just yet @Panzerkiel why so quiet?

 

[hasssanali8998]

Some memes to lighten up

Rating iaf fighters by their performance

 

[Toxic]

The imagery which only shows the shadows of radar. Chunian has already been debunked by Google Earth itself.

None of the footage shows the impact - People shot those drones with G3s and MGs at radar sites in the absence of counter UAS systems.

There was minor damage at 2 sites - rest all is just piss pathetic BDA by IAF.

Worst part they are going to repeat the BS to try to make it true.

 

[kimjongun]

There was minor damage at 2 sites - rest all is just piss pathetic BDA by IAF.

India claimed the following sites ,
Arifwala
Chunian
Pasrur
SHAHBAZ
Sukkur
2-3 more but the only concrete ones look like Sukkur and the Girrafe radar at shahbaz

 

[side-winder]

India claimed the following sites ,
Arifwala
Chunian
Pasrur
SHAHBAZ
Sukkur
2-3 more but the only concrete ones look like Sukkur and the Girrafe radar at shahbaz

Both Sukkur and Shahbaz are not true - i still have friends posted in those units.

 

[Tomcats]

The hud image seems to be from Lahore so was the sukkur one edited?

For Sukkur we have only satellite imagery that was released from India for now, whether they release further stuff into the future is yet to be seen.

The imagery which only shows the shadows of radar. Chunian has already been debunked by Google Earth itself.

None of the footage shows the impact - People shot those drones with G3s and MGs at radar sites in the absence of counter UAS systems.

There was minor damage at 2 sites - rest all is just piss pathetic BDA by IAF.

We cannot debunk Chunian through GE imagery due to the resolution being too low to make out whether or not it was hit since the claim is of the radar head. That said, it doesn't prove it got hit through satellite imagery alone. Although, they have HUD footage so... Whether they release it all I guess we'll have to wait and see.

People shot those drones with G3s and MGs at radar sites in the absence of counter UAS systems.

This does not inspire confidence....

 

[kimjongun]

Both Sukkur and Shahbaz are not true - i still have friends posted in those units.

idk man , its really hard to put a blind to your trust me bro claims , no hate we all respect your reputation and sources but the shahbaz one seems true idk

 

[Toxic]

For Sukkur we have only satellite imagery that was released from India for now, whether they release into the future is yet to be seen.

We cannot debunk Chunian through GE imagery due to the resolution being too low to make out whether or not it was hit since the claim is of the radar head. That said, it doesn't prove it got hit through satellite imagery alone. Although, they have HUD footage so... Whether they release it all I guess we'll have to wait and see.

This does not inspire confidence....

We have decently high resolution imagery including by the IAF, the problem with your argument is that unless you are using fireworks you can't just hit the radar head while leaving the structure without a single burn Mark.

Here's imagery of US site that was hit by a Iranian LM



Burn marks and clear structural damage.