Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

[Maea]

Relax bro - you don't have to be overly critical of such tiny things.

Youtube is full of TV shows / documentaries of interviews involving military personnel from nearly all major militaries.

Some poeple have this habit of shitting on their own people/culture, esp those who grew up in the west or under heavy western influence. There's nothing we can do.

 

[RedRock]

Kashmir belongs to Pakistan. Period.

Are you kashmiri? Kashmiris decide who they want, and obviously, IA, they will choose us. But its for them to choose/decide. No need to be arrogant, thats the attitude that lost us bangladesh

Way off topic, so i will not be answering more regarding this

 

[safriz]

The fools are the ones who take such statements at face value and believe it is possible for Pakistan to do the things they claim for “PFX”.

BTW F-7 HUD was developed in Pakistan and given to China.
Likewise the entire software of JF 17 was written in Pakistan, for the fist time ever for a fighter jet in C language.
Just saying

Also if you want proof of Pakistan making اڑن طشتری۔۔ You should watch Haqeeqat TV

 

[Oscar]

BTW F-7 HUD was developed in Pakistan and given to China.
Likewise the entire software of JF 17 was written in Pakistan, for the fist time ever for a fighter jet in C language.
Just saying

Also if you want proof of Pakistan making اڑن طشتری۔۔ You should watch Haqeeqat TV

Not exactly true.
Only true to the extent in that PAF contributed personnel to make up for manpower shortage at CAC during JF-17 program.

 

[Falcon26]

While members are right to be excited about Fatah 3, which is supposedly HD-1, the fact the Indians are very advanced in their testing of scramjet engines should worry Pakistani military observers. How long can Pakistan continue to import missiles while India innovates?

HD-1 type inductions should be for stop-gap measures as you can’t sustain an import based missile program.

 

[Ali_Baba]

Likewise the entire software of JF 17 was written in Pakistan, for the fist time ever for a fighter jet in C language.
Just saying

The software lineage of the JF17 is from the J10A, you only have to look at some of the MFD screens to see that. Pakistan may have provided some labour but the IP is very much chinese.

 

[Waz]

While members are right to be excited about Fatah 3, which is supposedly HD-1, the fact the Indians are very advanced in their testing of scramjet engines should worry Pakistani military observers. How long can Pakistan continue to import missiles while India innovates?

HD-1 type inductions should be for stop-gap measures as you can’t sustain an import based missile program.

There is collaboration with China on it, there was quite a bit of news a while back.

The key elements of why this is exciting is due to the following;
-It has a cost advantage compared to Brahmos, it's lighter and less complex
-Uses solid fuel as opposed to liquid so simplifies storage, handling, and rapid launch procedures compared with it's counterpart
-It can be scaled up much faster

It's a major milestone but the military needs to look further ahead.

 

[Waz]

Preparation Time: The missile can be ready for launch in under five minutes.
Firing Rate: A second missile can be launched just 10 seconds after the first.
Relocation: The launch vehicle can leave its position within three minutes of firing to avoid retaliatory strikes.

In addition to the ground-launched model, an air-launched version (HD-1A) and potential ship-based configurations exist, offering a multi-domain threat similar to the operational flexibility of India's missile forces.

Comparing the Rivals: Fatah-3 vs. BrahMos​

The unveiling of the Fatah-3 invites immediate comparison with the Indo-Russian BrahMos, currently the gold standard for supersonic cruise missiles.

Feature	Fatah-3 (Estimated)	BrahMos (Current)
Top Speed	Mach 3.0 – 4.0	Mach 2.8 – 3.0
Range	290 – 450 km	290 – 400+ km
Service Entry	Newly Unveiled	2006
Platform	Land (Air/Sea planned)	Land, Sea, and Air (Operational)

 

[Anonymous25]

@Ak01
Found the image they are using.

 

[farooqbhai]

@Ak01
Found the image they are using.
View attachment 196712
View attachment 196711

Image is from bit diff angle

 

[Corax]

The trees are missing from the Chinese source.

 

[Ak01]

@Ak01
Found the image they are using.
View attachment 196712
View attachment 196711

good find, nice job

 

[Ak01]

The trees are missing from the Chinese source.

its just because the pic is taken from another angle

 

[Waz]

@Ak01
Found the image they are using.
View attachment 196712
View attachment 196711

Nasty weapon.
Looking forward to the tests.

 

[safriz]

@Ak01
Found the image they are using.
View attachment 196712
View attachment 196711

ISPR is such an embarrassment.
Its like Altaf Bhai and Rabita committee.
Altaf bhai issued statement and then the Rabita committee had to scramble for justification and explanations.

ISPR makes these embarrassing booboo and we have to defend them all over the Internet.

Now I am suspicious if HD 1 is even indicted, or some ISPR babu just had a brain fart

Here's Altaf bhai..as a proof of Pakistanhaving HD 1 , .because why not