Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[AZ_HighCountry]

Meanwhile, Russia is now in Year 4 of the Three Day Special Military Operation.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Well guys that's what we called a trap. US is being humiliated everyday day and they finally realized no military action can solve the issue. Infact military action will make things worse for them.
So they face two options take a bad deal and escalate it military and suffer more. They can't take any option. It's like a infected wound left to cause more pain and everyday you sprinkle some salt on it.To add insult to Injury the childish threats of trump is destroying remaining respect left of US.

 

[SecularNationalist]

Meanwhile, Russia is now in Year 4 of the Three Day Special Military Operation.

It's easier to start a war but very difficult to end it.That's why maintaining the escalation ladder is a big thing in conflicts.

 

[Gripen9]

Maybe Iran should not accept the ceasefire….

 

[abgoosht]

lol no, we have a PACT with KSA, we are honoring it, its not Anti-Iran...stop making everyone your enemy in the region, last thing Iran wants is Pakistan as enemy.

If you think Pakistani military presence in KSA will give KSA a green light to allow US to use it's bases to launch attacks on Iran then you are dreaming. Iran will take whatever measure necessary to protect itself.

 

[abgoosht]

Meanwhile, Russia is now in Year 4 of the Three Day Special Military Operation.

What's the relevance to this thread or the post you quoted?

 

[Flotilla]

are you sure she iranian? Looks like someone from lunatic asylum

Cocaine and bottox can have devastating results provoking serious physical and mental issues.

 

[Professor Jiang]

 

[Flotilla]

That's not why, it's because a lot of senators believe this war was completely unnecessary. It had nothing to do with the loss of a few planes. no one wants any loss, but in war there are losses.

In this case it was an extremely small loss in the massive USA Air Force.

Small loss of at least 1 E3 and at least 4 Tankers.

This war was started to "free" iranians, continued to eliminate the nuclear and ballistic threat and finalized with the objective of reopening Strait of Hormuz.

So all in all if you're a baboon doesn't matter if you loose 0,1% of USAF planes, the question relies on how many other looses Will people accept for playing cards with the Pentagon.

 

[KAL-EL]

Small loss of at least 1 E3 and at least 4 Tankers.

This war was started to "free" iranians, continued to eliminate the nuclear and ballistic threat and finalized with the objective of reopening Strait of Hormuz.

So all in all if you're a baboon doesn't matter if you loose 0,1% of USAF planes, the question relies on how many other looses Will people accept for playing cards with the Pentagon.

Well personally I'm against the war so I'm not playing cards with the Pentagon anytime soon.

Still doesn't change the fact that those losses were little more than a pin prick in the USA arsenal. Obviously no one wants any losses, but that's unrealistic in war

 

[SteppeWolff]

If you think Pakistani military presence in KSA will give KSA a green light to allow US to use it's bases to launch attacks on Iran then you are dreaming. Iran will take whatever measure necessary to protect itself.

Pakistani military presence in KSA is for the protection of KSA, there's no offensive purpose. If you think Pakistan will renegade on its pact with KSA over Iran, you are dreaming too.

 

[Meengla]

Trita Parsi is the expert on Iran-US relations. I didn't have time to watch full video but so far in the video he says gaps have narrowed in the talks and that the fissile material issue can be resolved and should not be allowed to derail the talks which would lead to bad consequences for both sides. He is also saying the latest Ayatollah statement about keeping the fissile material is not interpreted correctly: The material should not be given to America is the bottom line.
BTW, this is a new Pakistani English language channel and has interesting guests. Doesn't get enough exposure.

 

[东风夜放花千树]

That's not why, it's because a lot of senators believe this war was completely unnecessary. It had nothing to do with the loss of a few planes. no one wants any loss, but in war there are losses.

In this case it was an extremely small loss in the massive USA Air Force.

I find it hard to agree with your view.

I really find it difficult to understand one thing: why does U.S. law grant the president a 60-day war authorization? When the U.S. president wages war, they only need to withdraw troops within 60 days, and there is also a 30-day buffer period. This is the War Powers Act passed in 1973.

This seems more like a period of observation for the U.S. Congress and the American people. If the war the president initiates holds an advantage, most members of Congress and Americans will choose to support the war. If the war initiated by the president does not achieve the expected results, most members of Congress and Americans will choose to oppose the war.

According to a Harris poll in December 2025, 76% of American voters support arresting Maduro, and 85% support ousting him.

According to a poll released in May 2026, 61% of Americans surveyed believe that launching a war against Iran was a wrong decision, with fewer than 20% believing the action was successful. 77% of American voters were concerned that military action would trigger terrorist attacks against the U.S. homeland.

In February 2026, support for military action in Israel exceeded 80%. However, with Iran's counterattacks, from March to May, Israel frequently experienced anti-war protests. Yet Israel’s invasions of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, and its bombings in Qatar, did not provoke large-scale opposition from the Israeli people.

In Iran, Palestine, Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon—these wars were all initiated by the U.S. and Israel. The U.S. and Israel cannot wait until they find themselves unable to achieve victory to begin opposing the war.

This gives others the impression that the U.S. and Israelis are not genuinely seeking peace; they only realize the war might reach them personally.

On May 19, the U.S. Senate passed a bill to limit Trump’s ability to wage war with 50 votes in favor and 47 against. But this is only the first step. The bill needs at least two rounds of votes and then must be passed by the House of Representatives. If Trump exercises his presidential veto, Congress would need a two-thirds vote in both chambers to override it, which is impossible. This has never happened in U.S. history.

The decisions made by American lawmakers are only because they realize victory won’t come easily, turning from evil to 'justice.' American lawmakers do not care about the Iranians dying under U.S. bombings. It can even be said that American lawmakers are accomplices to the war; they do not become noble by trying to stop it. The fact is, they are unable to stop the war.

 

[东风夜放花千树]

Pakistani military presence in KSA is for the protection of KSA, there's no offensive purpose. If you think Pakistan will renegade on its pact with KSA over Iran, you are dreaming too.

I agree with your point of view. The main task of Pakistan's troops stationed in Saudi Arabia is to protect Saudi Arabia.

According to the military agreement signed by the two countries, Pakistan provides Saudi Arabia with comprehensive defense commitments. The credibility of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia is trustworthy.

 

[KAL-EL]

I find it hard to agree with your view.

I really find it difficult to understand one thing: why does U.S. law grant the president a 60-day war authorization? When the U.S. president wages war, they only need to withdraw troops within 60 days, and there is also a 30-day buffer period. This is the War Powers Act passed in 1973.

This seems more like a period of observation for the U.S. Congress and the American people. If the war the president initiates holds an advantage, most members of Congress and Americans will choose to support the war. If the war initiated by the president does not achieve the expected results, most members of Congress and Americans will choose to oppose the war.

According to a Harris poll in December 2025, 76% of American voters support arresting Maduro, and 85% support ousting him.

According to a poll released in May 2026, 61% of Americans surveyed believe that launching a war against Iran was a wrong decision, with fewer than 20% believing the action was successful. 77% of American voters were concerned that military action would trigger terrorist attacks against the U.S. homeland.

In February 2026, support for military action in Israel exceeded 80%. However, with Iran's counterattacks, from March to May, Israel frequently experienced anti-war protests. Yet Israel’s invasions of Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, and its bombings in Qatar, did not provoke large-scale opposition from the Israeli people.

In Iran, Palestine, Yemen, Syria, and Lebanon—these wars were all initiated by the U.S. and Israel. The U.S. and Israel cannot wait until they find themselves unable to achieve victory to begin opposing the war.

This gives others the impression that the U.S. and Israelis are not genuinely seeking peace; they only realize the war might reach them personally.

On May 19, the U.S. Senate passed a bill to limit Trump’s ability to wage war with 50 votes in favor and 47 against. But this is only the first step. The bill needs at least two rounds of votes and then must be passed by the House of Representatives. If Trump exercises his presidential veto, Congress would need a two-thirds vote in both chambers to override it, which is impossible. This has never happened in U.S. history.

The decisions made by American lawmakers are only because they realize victory won’t come easily, turning from evil to 'justice.' American lawmakers do not care about the Iranians dying under U.S. bombings. It can even be said that American lawmakers are accomplices to the war; they do not become noble by trying to stop it. The fact is, they are unable to stop the war.

Well that's one of the great things about this place, you don't have to agree.