BJP Victory in West Bengal Intensifies ‘Push-in’ Anxieties in Bangladesh

MNZGamerX

Registered Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2023
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
1,907
Reputation
927.6
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
Over 80 percent of India’s border with Bangladesh now falls under the direct rule of the BJP, which thrives on anti-migrant rhetoric.

By Snigdhendu Bhattacharya
May 21, 2026

thediplomat_2026-05-21-165931.jpg

Over the past decade, leaders of India’s ruling BJP have often said that India would be able to permanently solve the problem of illegal migration from Bangladesh once the BJP formed a government in the eastern state of West Bengal, which borders Bangladesh.

On May 4, the BJP scripted a landslide victory in West Bengal and subsequently formed the government.

News of the BJP’s Bengal victory and return to power in neighboring Assam immediately triggered speculations in Bangladesh over the possibility of a fresh, even intensified drive to push alleged illegal Bangladeshi migrants into Bangladesh.

Five Indian states share borders with Bangladesh. Of them, West Bengal accounts for more than half of India’s 4,096.7 km-long border with Bangladesh. Assam and Tripura, which share borders of 263 km and 856 km, respectively, with Bangladesh, have been under BJP rule for nearly a decade. The party is also part of the ruling coalition in Meghalaya, which shares a 443-km border with Bangladesh. Only Mizoram, which shares a 318-km border with Bangladesh, does not have the BJP in power.

The Bengal victory brings over four-fifths of the India-Bangladesh border under direct BJP rule.

Since being named the BJP prime ministerial candidate in 2013, Modi put forward a new policy on migrants from Bangladesh, especially in the context of West Bengal and Assam. Hindus from Bangladesh are refugees, who deserve equal rights as all Indian citizens, he said, while Muslims are infiltrators, eating into the country’s resources. While the first must be accorded citizenship, the second should be expelled. This was formalized as the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019, which grants citizenship to non-Muslim migrants from India’s Muslim-majority neighbors, i.e., Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

The process of what is called “push-back” in India and “push-in” in Bangladesh is not new. It is an informal process, bypassing the formal diplomatic procedure, which is time-consuming. India had launched a drive formally named “Operation Pushback” in 1992, which was subsequently condemned by Amnesty International.

However, there was a rapid escalation in such push-backs after February 2025, especially after U.S. President Donald Trump started deporting planeloads of undocumented migrants, including to India.

Some of these people that India pushed into Bangladesh turned out to be Indians and were subsequently brought back. This “push-back” deepened anxieties and tension in India, especially in areas near the border.

Simultaneously, the government launched the controversial Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Millions of people without documents were removed from electoral rolls because they were allegedly Bangladeshis who had entered India illegally. The assembly election in West Bengal was held without resolving disputes around 2.7 million voters who had challenged their deletions from the roll.

Earlier this year, Modi said that illegal immigration poses a serious threat to India’s security, social balance, and the rights of the poor and youth. Justifying the decision to send them to Bangladesh, he pointed out even the world’s most powerful democracies identify, detain, and deport illegal immigrants without facing questions on their democratic credentials.

Now that so many voters have been deleted from West Bengal’s voter roll, there are apprehensions in Bangladesh that the Indian government, with the support of the BJP governments in border states, will push the “illegal migrants” into Bangladesh. Voicing this concern, Bangladesh’s Home Minister Salahuddin Ahmed said that he hoped that no such incident of push-ins would happen. The Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) has been instructed to remain vigilant along the frontier.

Bangladesh Foreign Minister Khalilur Rahman warned that Dhaka would respond firmly if push-in incidents increased. “If any kind of push-in incident occurs after the change of power in West Bengal, then Bangladesh will take appropriate measures,” he said.

In response, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that the “core issue” was the repatriation of “illegal Bangladeshis” from India. “This obviously requires cooperation from Bangladesh. Over 2,862 cases of nationality verification are pending with Bangladesh, some for over five years,” he said, adding that India expects Dhaka to expedite the process for smooth repatriation.

Illegal immigration from Bangladesh has been a contentious issue for decades, particularly in Assam and parts of West Bengal. The BJP had made border security and deportation of undocumented migrants a key electoral promise. The recent electoral victories have emboldened the party to push these agendas more assertively at the state level. After taking charge, the new BJP chief minister of West Bengal, Suvendu Adhikari, said that “detection and deletion” had already been done — hinting at the SIR exercise — and the state government will soon start to “deport.”

Bangladesh, on the other hand, denies large-scale illegal migration. It has repeatedly protested alleged “push-ins” and demanded that India must follow the mutually agreed process for repatriation.

During its West Bengal campaign, the BJP repeatedly promised to throw undocumented migrants out of the border. Assam’s BJP chief minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, too, has long maintained a hardline stance against illegal immigration and threatened to intensify the expulsion drive on illegal migrants once he returned to power.

Whether push-backs (or push-ins) will increase in the coming months remains a matter of speculation. However, the new BJP government has already started acting on one of its key border-related promises — finishing the fencing of the Bangladesh-India border.

Of the 2,216.7 km border that West Bengal shares with Bangladesh, 1,647.7 km was fenced as of August 2025. The Modi government had repeatedly alleged that the regional government in West Bengal was not cooperating in acquiring land for border fencing. After coming to power, West Bengal’s new government immediately instructed the beginning of the land acquisition process for the unfenced corridors. The work, however, will take months to finish.

Meanwhile, the BJP will have to show some visible action on their promised anti-migrant drive before the 2029 parliamentary election. On the other hand, Dhaka-based political observers feel that incidents of push-ins from India will help the opposition camp in Bangladesh to mount pressure on the Tarique Rahman-led Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) government to confront India.

Bangladesh-India relations have only recently shown signs of improving after a tense 18 months under Bangladesh’s Muhammad Yunus-led interim government. In the first week of May, India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said that both India and Bangladesh’s new BNP government share a “general understanding” on gradually restoring institutional engagement.

“We are getting down to reactivating all tools of bilateral relations. Contacts are being made at the ministerial level,” Misri said.

Under such circumstances, how ruling parties in India and Bangladesh balance their internal political promises with diplomatic and security interests will shape politics around border management and migration in the coming months.
 

Centre Tells Top Court Bringing 4 Bangladesh Deportees Back. Then Adds Caveat​

The case is being heard on a plea filed by one Bodhu Shekh, father of Sonali Khatun, the 9-month pregnant woman who was brought back from Bangladesh for her delivery in December.​

Read Time:3 mins

Share
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Email


Centre Tells Top Court Bringing 4 Bangladesh Deportees Back. Then Adds Caveat

Khatun's husband, Danish, however, remained behind in Bangladesh.


New Delhi:
Four people deported to Bangladesh will be brought back, and their Indian citizenship documents will be verified, the Centre told the Supreme Court on Friday. The submission, however, was punctuated by a caveat - the move shouldn't be treated as a precedent.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed a bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant that the government has decided to bring back Danish, Sweety Bibi, Quarban Shekh, and Iman Shekh, whose relatives had approached the top court after they were deported to Bangladesh. All four claim they are Indian citizens.

"We have instructions. The government will bring them back, ascertain their status, and take steps as needed. Please record this is in peculiar fact of the case and not a precedent," Mehta told the court.

Recording the Centre's submission, the Chief Justice said the four individuals will be brought back within 10 days, and their citizenship status will then be verified.

Also read: After Supreme Court Order, Pregnant Woman Eagerly Awaits Return To India

"SG submits that in peculiar facts of the case and not a precedent, the respondents will be brought back, and their Indian citizenship status shall be checked. This is expected to take place in 10 days," the bench observed, listing the matter after the court reopens.

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

The case is being heard on a plea filed by Bodhu Shekh, father of Sonali Khatun, the 9-month pregnant woman who was brought back from Bangladesh for her delivery in December on orders of the Supreme Court.



LATEST

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/bal...dtv&utm_medium=ticker&utm_source=vdoai_ticker


Her husband, Danish, however, remained behind in Bangladesh.

What made their predicament worse is the fact that the Bangladesh authorities put them in detention, arguing they possessed valid Indian documents.

The plea raised allegations that several Indian nationals were wrongly deported to Bangladesh.

Also read: "It Was Torture": Deported Pregnant Woman Who Was Brought Back To India From Dhaka

During the earlier hearing, Chief Justice Surya Kant observed that the State must sometimes "bend in humanitarian interest" and directed the government to provide all necessary facilities for the woman and her son during their return journey.

Khatun has claimed that she is the daughter of Bhodu Sheikh, whose Indian citizenship is undisputed.

Justice Joymala Bagchi had observed that if Sonali is indeed Bhodu Sheikh's daughter, she and her children would be entitled to Indian citizenship under the Citizenship Act.

The matter will now be heard again after the court's vacation.



My comment:

Traditionally India in the 20th century was respected as a key leader of the (non-white) non-aligned movement and had sympathies for (non-white) post-colonial people after having thrown off the yoke off British colonialism in almost the middle of the 20th century. The India of Nehru was never meant to be a fascist state but one focused on the upliftment of the masses.

1779462376495.png

Nehru with Jinnah.

1779462469269.png

1779462542405.png

Modern India was respected by people from Africa, Asia, Latin America and the ex-communist bloc as a leader of the post-colonial world. The biggest parliamentary democracy in the world with a strong civilian government that had control of the military and not the other way round, a diverse multi-ethnic giant which was successfully eradicating poverty, hunger and illiteracy.

Unfortunately the vision of a progressive India is now being hijacked by fascists in the BJP. There are millions of Hindu Bengalis in India, but also amongst Indian Bengalis there are those who are Muslim, and to call Indian Bengalis of Islamic faith 'Bangladesh' is a betrayal of the values of modern India. The BJP and other Hindutva extremists need to be careful. There is a saying:

"What Bengal thinks today India thinks tomorrow".

Bangladesh has a bigger population than Russia which has a massive nuclear arsenal, the BJP should be very carefully when dealing with Bengalis as both the British and West Pakistanis found out to their cost.
 
Nothing wrong with returning illegal immigrants to Bangladesh. Calling it a "push-in" is just an euphemism.

I agree with you that there is nothing wrong in returning illegal immigrants to their country of origin.

However what is wrong is removing citizenship from millions of people because of their faith in an attempt to ethnically cleanse millions of Indian Muslims to create a "purer" more Hindutva state.
 
I agree with you that there is nothing wrong in returning illegal immigrants to their country of origin.

However what is wrong is removing citizenship from millions of people because of their faith in an attempt to ethnically cleanse millions of Indian Muslims to create a "purer" more Hindutva state.
That is a different issue that needs to be studied more closely, but it's focused mostly on northeast India, specifically West Bengal. Those immigrants who acquired Indian citizenship need to have their application reviewed to ensure that the rules were followed. Mamta Banerjee and TNC used illegal immigrants as a vote bank. Now India needs to clean up its mess.
Why don't you start with Hasina? She is THE WORLD FAMOUS ILLEGAL BANGLADESHI HIDDING IN INDIA.

Start with her or shut up.
I can't believe PDF made you a moderator, but please keep posting. 🍿
 
Not only Bangladesh border but we need to seal Myanmar border as well to prevent rohingyas and bangladeshis again who may enter Myanmar and then again try to infiltrate in India from there....
 
Isn't it a fact that Hasina is staying in India illegally?

Do you dispute?

I'll remind every Indian about Hasina whenever they bring up so called illegal BDian in India.
Hasina has taken political asylum in India after India approved it.... you can't compare that with jahils who cross borders like dunkise and illegally enter...

If they are that craving to come to India then there are procedures and protocols.... just follow them and then visit as a respected guests....
 
The BJP Win in West Bengal : Perspectives of a Concerned Bangladesh

Mohiuddin Zaman
May 24, 2026

1779634805_dcef264aa9d8ed790e73.jpg

Recently in the elections in West Bengal, India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) , the Hindutva sectarian party led by Shuvendu Adhikari defeated Mamata Banerjee’s All India Trinamool Congress (AITC ), ending its 14-year rule of the state. The BJP’s win in West Bengal, which has been part of a series of wins by the BJP, India’s ruling party, is a testimony to India’s rising influence of Hindutva-inspired sectarian politics that not only threaten the safety and security of its minorities, especially the Muslims, but also pose a source of much concern for countries that border India.

From a Bangladeshi perspective, the radical transformation of India’s political landscape and social psyche over the past two decades – from liberal democracy to majoritarian sectarianism - is anything but inspiring; rather, it is deeply worrying.

Many observers trace this transformation to the rise of Narendra Modi, with his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat and the anti-Muslim riots of 2002, which many believe he passively encouraged. Since then, a powerful current of Hindu sectarian revivalism — variously described as Hindutva, Hindu cultural nationalism, or civilizational nationalism — has steadily moved from the ideological margins into the centre of Indian political life, if not Hindu India’s way of life these days.

Today, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its allies govern most Indian states and union territories, giving the movement unprecedented institutional reach. Ironically, the ideological roots of Hindu revivalism that emerged in late nineteenth-century Bengal appear to have come full circle with the BJP’s recent electoral victory in West Bengal.

For many in Bangladesh and elsewhere in South Asia, the most troubling aspect of Suvendu/BJP’s victory is not merely electoral success, but the accompanying social polarisation; this transformation is not merely an electoral transition, but a warning of social polarisation and open hostility towards Muslims.

Reports of post-election violence, attacks on homes and businesses, inflammatory rhetoric, and the renaming of places associated with India’s Muslim past have deepened fears that the country is moving toward a more exclusionary national identity, which is in contradiction to India’s constitution – a democratic secular polity - which India’s founding fathers formulated to advance India.

Indeed, statements by some regional political leaders in states such as Assam and West Bengal have further intensified the anxieties of the Muslims.

Critics argue that these developments are part of a broader attempt to centralise political and cultural power around the BJP and Narendra Modi personally. This has led some commentators to draw comparisons with other highly centralised political systems of the twentieth century, including that of Mao Zedong’s China during the Cultural Revolution, and some even compare Narendra Modi’s India with interwar Europe under Adolf Hitler.

No doubt that such comparisons are extreme but given the rise of the BJP’s grip over India and its sectarianism, the fear is genuine.

Nevertheless, concerns about India’s human rights backsliding cannot be ruled out completely, can they? Besides, the rising spectre of one leader and one party; personality-centred politics; the rise of ‘Godi media’ (an appeasing media) and increasing pressure on freedom of speech, curtailments of dissent by the NGOs, universities, and intellectuals; and attempts to reshape historical narratives, educational content, and cultural identity around a majoritarian nationalist framework are disturbing.

Some analysts therefore describe present-day India not as a totalitarian state, but as an “illiberal democracy”, with electoral majoritarianism — where democratic institutions promote political and social isolation, space for and marginalisation of minorities and where voices against the majority dissent steadily narrow and are either stifled or ignored.

The comparison with Mao’s Cultural Revolution is usually less about communist ideology and more about cultural “purification.” Mao sought to destroy the “Four Olds” — old ideas, customs, culture, and habits — to reshape Chinese society around a communist revolutionary identity.

Critics argue that aspects of Hindu nationalist politics similarly seek to erase or civilisation, minimise centuries of Muslim influence on Indian culture and civilisation through symbolic policy interventions and political acts, for example banning beef consumption (Hindus, the majority people in India, regard cow as a deity and this prohibit consumption of beef) renaming cities and public places, revising textbooks by deleting India’s Muslim history, redefining national identity, and portraying Muslim rule as invasion, an affront to the Indian civilization.

More troubling is the recent rise in venomous anti-Muslim rhetoric that has contributed to polarisation of Indians along religious lines – the majority Hindus and the minority Muslims, more so, India’s political polarisation, since Modi’s rise in Gujarat in 2001.

The communal messaging witnessed during recent election campaigns in states such as West Bengal and Assam, has since promoted targeted violence against Muslims in both these states of India.

Some civil society organisations have even drawn parallels between the rise of Muslim othering in India and the persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany. Such comparisons should not be made casually, because the Holocaust was a singular historical atrocity involving industrial-scale genocide. Nevertheless, the comparison emerges from concerns over dehumanising propaganda, collective suspicion toward a minority community, and the portrayal of Muslims as demographic, cultural, or political threats to the nation.

Furthermore, A US-based expert tracking on communal harmony in India has testified before the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) on “senior political leaders' role in enabling hate and violence, …in demolishing minority properties, social media platforms' amplification of hate speech, and the growing transnational repression targeting critics abroad.” The testimony has submitted proofs of involvement of the top leaders, central and state systematic repression of the minorities especially Muslims as "embedded in bureaucracy, codified in law, shielded by absolute impunity, and steadily more ruthless in execution," .

For many in Bangladesh, the rising trends in Muslim persecution in India are seen with great apprehension. These sectarian initiatives are not only about India’s internal trajectory but also about the broader implications for South Asia, especially in the neighbouring Muslim-majority countries such as Bangladesh, where they host a large number of Hindu minorities as well.

However, the good news is that BJP’s sectarian policies have started to hurt India itself, politically and, more importantly, economically. Most Hindus and Muslims prefer and continue to live side by side without seeing one another as enemies. The social realities of the Sub-Continent seem to be still stronger than the narratives of hatred propagated by demagogues , television studios and social media networks .

Ultimately, the future of India — and perhaps the stability of South Asia itself — may depend on whether those quieter traditions of coexistence can prevail over the politics of fear, hate and division. Let us hope for the best.

 
Why don't you start with Hasina? She is THE WORLD FAMOUS ILLEGAL BANGLADESHI HIDDING IN INDIA.

Start with her or shut up.
And who are you to decide our internal policies?
We don't want illegal immigrants here especially from Bangladesh even a Pakistani is welcome here if it's legal
 
I agree with you that there is nothing wrong in returning illegal immigrants to their country of origin.

However what is wrong is removing citizenship from millions of people because of their faith in an attempt to ethnically cleanse millions of Indian Muslims to create a "purer" more Hindutva state.
Truth is most of the Muslim population in the east india especially Bangladesh and Assam is from Bangladesh!
These guys are the ones that came here largely after 70's , and spread all over india .
 
It shouldn't be a concern. BJP promised to be tougher on illegal crossing. I see a lot of videos where people from BD approach the border fence for whatever reason. That in itself is a violation. The fence is in India, by coming close to it you're already illegally in India. It also creates unnecessary tensions.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top