We didn’t need an “official confirmation” from Air Vice Marshal Tariq Mahmood Ghazi to understand the trajectory of its fighter modernization. Anyone familiar with PAF force structure logic knows the only coherent path was always upgrade JF-17 and additional J‑10C airframes while the J‑35AE ecosystem matures.
The reasoning is doctrinal, not speculative.
1. The J‑10C expansion was always part of the plan
Once Pakistan committed to a high‑end BVR envelope built around PL‑15, AESA, and long‑range escort roles, the fleet could not remain limited to a symbolic number. The PAF’s internal planning has long revolved around 36–48 J‑10Cs, because that is the minimum force size required to sustain:
• rotational readiness
• persistent air‑superiority coverage
• wartime surge capacity
• training and conversion pipelines
All the basing prep, simulators, and maintenance infrastructure were aligned with this number years before any public statements.
2. Introducing a new platform is never plug‑and‑play
A fifth‑generation aircraft like the J‑35AE demands a completely different ecosystem:
• climate‑controlled shelters
• stealth‑compatible maintenance tooling
• software‑centric support chains
• hardened, survivable basing
• new training and certification tracks
This is not something Pakistan could improvise. The PAF has been quietly building this foundation, and only once it is complete does the J‑35AE become a viable induction candidate.
3. The J‑10C is the doctrinal bridge, not a competitor
The J‑10C fills the high‑end BVR, escort, and air‑dominance role that the JF‑17 was never designed for. It stabilizes the force structure while the J‑35AE matures. In PAF doctrine, the sequence is layered:
• JF‑17 → mass, strike, and numbers
• J‑10C → high‑end air superiority and BVR dominance
• J‑35AE → stealth penetration and deep‑strike
This is a deliberate architecture, not improvisation.
4. Pakistan is already embedded in the KAAN program
Parallel to the Chinese track, Pakistan is deeply engaged with Türkiye on the KAAN project. This is not symbolic cooperation, it is industrial participation under PFX Track‑2, involving:
• subsystem development
• software and mission‑system collaboration
• local assembly planning
• shared R&D pathways
This positions Pakistan as a future co‑producer, not just a buyer.
5. Saudi Arabia is the strategic multiplier
If Pakistan successfully convinces Saudi Arabia to co‑fund the KAAN program, a scenario that aligns with Riyadh’s own ambitions for aerospace sovereignty, the industrial equation changes dramatically.
With Saudi financing and Pakistani technical participation, the region could see:
• a KAAN assembly line in Pakistan by ~2035
• shared supply chains
• joint export potential
• a tri‑national aerospace ecosystem
This would be the first time in Pakistan’s history that it becomes a full partner in a fifth‑generation fighter program with real industrial depth.
6. The long‑term PAF roadmap is sequential and coherent
The modernization path is not reactive, it is structured:
1. Scale JF‑17 Block III
2. Expand J‑10C to 36–48 airframes
3. Build the stealth ecosystem
4. Induct J‑35AE
5. Develop KAAN co‑production capability
AVM Ghazi’s comments didn’t reveal anything new. They simply echoed what the doctrine already dictated.
share.google
