Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

tsunset said:
NK is a hermit kingdom with their people eating grass
Click to expand...
That is what the other side wants you to believe. North Korea may not be South Korea in terms of living standards; however, their Military progress alone is enough to prove that the propaganda spread against it is not real.
 
KingQamaR said:
It doesn’t matter, they didn’t break any rules and also the deal is sh!t. Nuclear weapons are a necessity now for Iran if they want to save their country from the US and ZIOs.
Click to expand...
It will no longer be possible for Iran to acquire Nuclear Weapons. Maybe in a few decades when scrutiny has diluted, when US has a more lenient President and when the time is just right to do so.
 
Ali_Baba said:

Donald Trump shares draft Iran peace agreement with Israel and other allies​


www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump shares draft Iran peace agreement with Israel and other allies

US president’s move comes as both sides try to prevent fresh ceasefire breaches scuppering a potential deal
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

From the same source link:

The draft Trump has shared is not vastly different to the one that has been circulating across the Middle East for days, under which the strait of Hormuz would be opened to commercial shipping, the US blockade of Iranian ports would be lifted and Iran would be given access to as much as $12bn (£9bn) in frozen assets.

The aim would be for commercial shipping in the strait to return to pre-war levels within 30 days and for negotiations envisaged to last as long as 60 days to commence on the future of Iran’s nuclear programme. This would include discussions about its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, a time-limited suspension of further enrichment and supervision by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Iran would renounce the use of nuclear weapons.

... ...

The current scope of the agreement would be deeply unpalatable for Israel, because it defers Iran making any firm nuclear commitments and requires a permanent ceasefire to include Lebanon.
 
Meengla said:
The Trump latest stunt of requiring the Abrahamic Accord as a condition for some 'deal' is already fizzling out. Pakistan officially already deflected that without annoying Trump and an MOU is almost ready to be signed.

Why wouldn't the Americans try to get out of this war? What could be achieved more other than doing some Dresden style bombing which would kill the civilians and destroy Iran? But a destroyed Iran would not be a 'victory' when the global economy tanks--yes, there are significant costs even to the Americans in that case. And speaking of Dresden style bombing of Iran: That carries a lot of risk because Iran has at least some credible air defense system to shoot down fighter jets and expensive drones.
Click to expand...
It’s a humiliating defeat for the US and quite possibly their fastest strategic defeat they’ve ever experienced. Just an epic failure, no matter which way we cut it……just looks real bad:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
VCheng said:
From the same source link:

The draft Trump has shared is not vastly different to the one that has been circulating across the Middle East for days, under which the strait of Hormuz would be opened to commercial shipping, the US blockade of Iranian ports would be lifted and Iran would be given access to as much as $12bn (£9bn) in frozen assets.

The aim would be for commercial shipping in the strait to return to pre-war levels within 30 days and for negotiations envisaged to last as long as 60 days to commence on the future of Iran’s nuclear programme. This would include discussions about its stockpile of highly enriched uranium, a time-limited suspension of further enrichment and supervision by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Iran would renounce the use of nuclear weapons.

... ...

The current scope of the agreement would be deeply unpalatable for Israel, because it defers Iran making any firm nuclear commitments and requires a permanent ceasefire to include Lebanon.
Click to expand...

The language of the "ceasefire" does not include Israel leaving Lebanese terriority, just to stop bombing and stay where they are.
 
Ali_Baba said:
The language of the "ceasefire" does not include Israel leaving Lebanese terriority, just to stop bombing and stay where they are.
Click to expand...

These are still drafts being circulated thus far. I would like to wait to see the final signed version to know the details.
 
آبِ پاکی را روی دستش ریخت
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Everything else is just theatre
 
Pay attention. Everything else is just noise.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
FUB said:
Pay attention. Everything else is just noise.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

IAEA chief saying we will hit the red line in June, Exxon chief saying similar, you can see why in reality trump is in a hurry despite what he says. The attacks on irgc boats is also a sign of desperation where they are probably contemplating carrying out a large scale attack to open the SOH but they know Iran has strategic advantage due to territory. All it takes is one drone to hot a tanker.

Iran needs to squeeze trump make him squirm, force Israel to stop bombing Lebanon and only open soh if they release Iranian assets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 122 (members: 5, guests: 117)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top