Taliban Wants To Build Afghanistan’s Air Defenses With Russia’s Help

[hasssanali8998]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

here u go

 

[RescueRanger]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

here u go

Theek hain but this is all theory, we have yet to see any of this materalize, besides most of Russian production is being expended in Ukraine and in defence of her own borders from relentless Ukrainian missile and drone strikes.

Personally this is not an alarming development and being blown out of proportion - does it merit monitoring (yes), does it cause concern (absolutely), is it a crisis (no).

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

here u go

Looks like the Russians have copied the US Stinger system.

 

[I*R*A]

naah
china wont like russian snooping in its backyard

China's influence inside Afghanistan is overexaggerated. It is not Xinjiang they are dealing with. They do not have any significant leverage against TTA.

 

[I*R*A]

The biggest danger is the TTP/BLA (which will happen) getting these, which will make airports in Balochistan and KPK dangerous for civilian traffic (when they are landing and taking off), and even PAA helicopters and VIP transport will be in crosshairs.

This is why I said Russians will act responsibly.

 

[hasssanali8998]

Looks like the Russians have copied the US Stinger system.

unfortunately yes
i hope we pay them back in kind by fully going team ukraine

 

[hasssanali8998]

This is why I said Russians will act responsibly.

 

[Michael]

Talis already experimenting with FPVs. This article is largely a nothing burger. Russia needs China so any move inside Afghanistan that upsets the Chinese apple cart will not go down to well in Beijing.

The real problem is:

This is just an analytical and predictive article. People here keep using this "foundation" for associative analysis, yet no one questions the article's authenticity, no one questions the author's true motives. And this "foundation" itself doesn't currently exist.

Our administrators and moderators are also deeply involved in this discussion.

This is the real issue.

If one day an article appears saying "India Wants To Build a Certain Weapon System With China's Help," will this forum start discussing whether Pakistan should attack China, or whether Pakistan should support Taiwanese independence, instead of questioning why this article even exists?

 

[I*R*A]

View attachment 199662

They do not have an option and I am sure they are not stupid.

 

[RescueRanger]

The real problem is:

This is just an analytical and predictive article. People here keep using this "foundation" for associative analysis, yet no one questions the article's authenticity, no one questions the author's true motives. And this "foundation" itself doesn't currently exist.

Our administrators and moderators are also deeply involved in this discussion.

This is the real issue.

If one day an article appears saying "India Wants To Build a Certain Weapon System With China's Help," will this forum start discussing whether Pakistan should attack China, or whether Pakistan should support Taiwanese independence, instead of questioning why this article even exists?

Brilliant post as usual and I agree with your line of questioning and thought. Problem is that a lot of people will not apply critical thinking and just take things at face value when they suit certain narratives.

Which is why I always decide to err on the side of caution and read between lines. Everyone has an agenda they wish to project and sometimes people forget this.

 

[I*R*A]

The real problem is:

This is just an analytical and predictive article. People here keep using this "foundation" for associative analysis, yet no one questions the article's authenticity, no one questions the author's true motives. And this "foundation" itself doesn't currently exist.

Our administrators and moderators are also deeply involved in this discussion.

This is the real issue.

If one day an article appears saying "India Wants To Build a Certain Weapon System With China's Help," will this forum start discussing whether Pakistan should attack China, or whether Pakistan should support Taiwanese independence, instead of questioning why this article even exists?

This got attention in Pakistan because the first thing TTA defense minister said upon landing in Kabul was "Now Pakistan won't be able to attack us from air anymore".

 

[RescueRanger]

This got attention in Pakistan because the first thing TTA defense minister said upon landing in Kabul was "Now Pakistan won't be able to attack us from air anymore".

Brother, that is not what Michael is eluding to. He is stating why don't Pakistani posters consider being critical and analysing things beyond the black and white.

I continue to maintain this article and any analysis thereof is a nothing burger.

 

[Michael]

Brilliant post as usual and I agree with your line of questioning and thought. Problem is that a lot of people will not apply critical thinking and just take things at face value when they suit certain narratives.

Which is why I always decide to err on the side of caution and read between lines. Everyone has an agenda they wish to project and sometimes people forget this.

Many people here are unaware of the situation between China and Russia. All analysis is built upon the current superficial narrative and the narrative structure established by Western English-language media. Analysis and predictions are based on the relationships between China and Pakistan, Russia and Pakistan, and China and Russia.

However, the complexity of this triangular relationship is far greater than the surface narrative suggests. Many deeper issues are completely obscured and hidden. It's difficult for people to penetrate this thick fog. And those who create this fog have a purpose. When you conduct research within this fog, whether you believe it or not, it's the result they want. But these results are far removed from what you desire.

 

[I*R*A]

Brother, that is not what Michael is eluding to. He is stating why don't Pakistani posters consider being critical and analysing things beyond the black and white.

I continue to maintain this article and any analysis thereof is a nothing burger.

I agree bro, I just wanted to let him know why this caught so much attention.

I am convinced that Russia my have agreed to help with the old Soviet systems left behind in Afghanistan. And obviously TTA, who are effectively an extension of indian kind of dehati aurat behavior so Yaqoob had to be dramatic, else he couldn't have sit on a toilet bowl.

 

[Michael]

This got attention in Pakistan because the first thing TTA defense minister said upon landing in Kabul was "Now Pakistan won't be able to attack us from air anymore".

I want to be the world's richest person!
I can be the world's richest person!
I am the world's richest person!

These are three completely different concepts!

The leader of a small African nation once publicly declared:

Sending 10,000 soldiers could wipe out any P5 country.

Do you need to continue analyzing and discussing this topic?