Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Garcia Sea said:
It has become clear that Epstein’s objective is to bind Iran with a false ceasefire while rendering it militarily and politically powerless. Just as Iraq was after the Gulf War, Iran—subjected to constant bombing, is rapidly weakening, and iri are allowing these indiscriminate airstrikes to continue.
The U.S. has now completely lost all restraint, having fully concluded that Iran lacks the courage to retaliate. If left unchecked, this will likely escalate to the establishment of no-fly zones in the south and Kurdish regions.
Click to expand...


That is what they did to Iraq between 1991 - 2003.
 
Garcia Sea said:
It has become clear that Epstein’s objective is to bind Iran with a false ceasefire while rendering it militarily and politically powerless. Just as Iraq was after the Gulf War, Iran—subjected to constant bombing, is rapidly weakening, and iri are allowing these indiscriminate airstrikes to continue.
The U.S. has now completely lost all restraint, having fully concluded that Iran lacks the courage to retaliate. If left unchecked, this will likely escalate to the establishment of no-fly zones in the south and Kurdish regions.
Click to expand...
To the contrary, IMO the US has shown incredible restraint.

As for the establishment of no-fly zones, you have to agree that is already in place. Anything that has transited Iranian airspace is because the US has allowed it.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
To the contrary, IMO the US has shown incredible restraint.

As for the establishment of no-fly zones, you have to agree that is already in place. Anything that has transited Iranian airspace is because the US has allowed it.
Click to expand...
Old Zionist Fake news. The lie about controlling Iranian airspace has been going on for at least three years; if there were any control whatsoever, Iran wouldn't be able to launch anything from its territory.
 
Things don't look good for iran if they are unable to cause damage to israel and establish lasting deterrence. Why the leadership make statements before the impacts?
I really wonder what's going on.......seems we r having an off/on/off type squirmishes with no clarity yet no "deal" while things r derailing albeit slowly, while iran suffers the hits/damages.
Just launching afew missiles is like wasting them altogether........are they for show?
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
AZ_HighCountry said:
To the contrary, IMO the US has shown incredible restraint.

As for the establishment of no-fly zones, you have to agree that is already in place. Anything that has transited Iranian airspace is because the US has allowed it.
Click to expand...

I don't think they have showed restraint.

If striking 13,000 targets inside Iran a few months ago is "restraint" then the word has lost all meaning. It's not restraint that's slowing them down right now. It's most probably logistics and ammunition levels.

They are being careful and calculated with their so called self-defense because they are running low on ammo and can't afford to do another massive rescue attempt. It will reflect badly on Trump.

If there is any real restraint they've managed to show so far, it is by not launching a nuke out of frustration.
 
Targeting energy and water infrastructure would be more damaging than targeting the same bases over and over again. They are already attacking such targets in Iran. High oil prices will affect decision making more than destroying US military targets which are more or less worthless and easily replaced.
 
Reports of Iran firing missiles at Mowfak Salti airbase in Jordan and at military installations in Kuwait and Bahrain. No reports of any real damage yet.
 
BigMela2onin said:
Targeting energy infrastructure and water plants would be more damaging than targeting the same bases over and over again. They are already attacking such targets in Iran.
Click to expand...
That is a final card to play and an example of MAD. We are not at that stage yet.

Remember also that ultimately Trump / America will sacrifice the GCC for the sake of Israel, if required. The last few years alone should have made it clear who is actually in charge of the US government.
 
Hayabusa said:
I don't think they have showed restraint.

If striking 13,000 targets inside Iran a few months ago is "restraint" then the word has lost all meaning. It's not restraint that's slowing them down right now. It's most probably logistics and ammunition levels.

They are being careful and calculated with their so called self-defense because they are running low on ammo and can't afford to do another massive rescue attempt. It will reflect badly on Trump.

If there is any real restraint they've managed to show so far, it is by not launching a nuke out of frustration.
Click to expand...
Do you believe the US has not been rearming? Spend some time on FR24. You can watch in real time the cargo flights headed out.

And it's not just USAF cargo aircraft. There is a lot of contracted capacity as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 7 more.
    • Total: 280 (members: 29, guests: 251)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top