India Foreign Policy Thread

Either you did not watch the entire video or you have no shame left.

Poor Meloni could have actually died, she was trying so hard to not to break out laughing.

If brown nosing were an Olympic event, Pakistan politicians would have taken all the medals.

But it is not their fault, it has become their second nature, after all they have to shine general saab's boot to just to survive as a politician in Pakistan. No wonder Imran khan use to call him "The Cherry Blossom".
Only a simple internet search will show Modi at a cheshire cat when shaking hands of leaders the retard wont let go or bursts into hindu language.
Now stop being a retard and bring Pakistan into every thread..............
 
CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii — The Department of War announced today that the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM) will officially restore its name to the U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM).
It's another sign that India has been dumped again by US. You should have seen Trump's interactions with Modi at G7 in France, he totally ignored him.
 
It's another sign that India has been dumped again by US. You should have seen Trump's interactions with Modi at G7 in France, he totally ignored him.
Lets hope modi treats trump like I treat people in real life

In other words "unless you provide me with food on my table or a service no one else can give me "

I will treat you with mild civil respect if your lucky on my better days

Otherwise I don't need you ...so get the f... Out of my face Trump
 
Either you did not watch the entire video or you have no shame left.

Poor Meloni could have actually died, she was trying so hard to not to break out laughing.

If brown nosing were an Olympic event, Pakistan politicians would have taken all the medals.

But it is not their fault, it has become their second nature, after all they have to shine general saab's boot to just to survive as a politician in Pakistan. No wonder Imran khan use to call him "The Cherry Blossom".

No hugs for strategic ally?

I guess thhe cope of Pakistan in the limelight and Modi ignored is hard?
 
you should some time visit Pakistan subreddit and hear your fellow countrymen, they used very civil language to express how they felt seeing that particular event, that post is still there so don't act tough, your own people were giving shabaz some very deserving titles

Indians talking about bad language on social media. Irony just died.....

I would not ask you to read Indian comments on anything ranging from white women to Australian cricketers. Vomit inducing retards

Now stop bringing Pakistan into everything. Love us living rent free in your hgead though
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Donald Trump : "If India were attacked, we would be there to help" the contention being "as long as Modi is in power". And that the trade deal will be signed soon.

Immediately reminds me of Kissinger's eternal quote. Always safe to never pitch all your eggs in the American basket.

Anyways now that the press conference part is over I expect both the sides to discuss actual problems in bilateral talks and speed up the defence acquisition speed.
 

Attachments

  • quote-to-be-an-enemy-of-america-can-be-dangerous-but-to-be-a-friend-is-fatal-henry-a-kissinger...jpg
    quote-to-be-an-enemy-of-america-can-be-dangerous-but-to-be-a-friend-is-fatal-henry-a-kissinger...jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Donald Trump : "If India were attacked, we would be there to help" the contention being "as long as Modi is in power". And that the trade deal will be signed soon.

Immediately reminds me of Kissinger's eternal quote. Always safe to never pitch all your eggs in the American basket.

Anyways now that the press conference part is over I expect both the sides to discuss actual problems in bilateral talks and speed up the defence acquisition speed.


Just like US forces were shooting Indian sailors like they were at a funfare a few days back, and when lazer eyes phoned Rubio he was (not even politely) told to f**k off?

A few nice words from your "Phraand" and all is good for Modi again. Now you wonder why India is not taken seriously anymore?
 
Just like US forces were shooting Indian sailors like they were at a funfare a few days back, and when lazer eyes phoned Rubio he was (not even politely) told to f**k off?

A few nice words from your "Phraand" and all is good for Modi again. Now you wonder why India is not taken seriously anymore?

Are you suggesting India was taken more seriously in the past
When it had gdp half the size of UK and France and growth rate of 2%
When it could only afford cheap russian weapons and had major hangovers from British rule for centuries.

Because the India I see today is rising middle power
And high respected one by the globe as whole
European Arabs Brics and global South
Are you creating your own ulterior world again of fantasy
 
Just like US forces were shooting Indian sailors like they were at a funfare a few days back, and when lazer eyes phoned Rubio he was (not even politely) told to f**k off?

A few nice words from your "Phraand" and all is good for Modi again. Now you wonder why India is not taken seriously anymore?
Did you even read my comment before going on the usual tirade? Who's gloating about anything? It's just news. If conference statements had any real impact on geopolitics, the world would look very different today. What matters is what diplomats discuss and get done behind closed doors.

This is Geopolitics 101. I'm sure that, behind the scenes, India is trying to get its shadow fleet exempted, just as it has in the past.
 
Did you even read my comment before going on the usual tirade? Who's gloating about anything? It's just news. If conference statements had any real impact on geopolitics, the world would look very different today. What matters is what diplomats discuss and get done behind closed doors.

This is Geopolitics 101. I'm sure that, behind the scenes, India is trying to get its shadow fleet exempted, just as it has in the past.

Yeah, just the point, you can post all the propoganda you want (ANI was sited as a global source of fake news by the EU), so when one counters it by mentioning that awkward thing called reality spare us your tears
 
Yeah, just the point, you can post all the propoganda you want (ANI was sited as a global source of fake news by the EU), so when one counters it by mentioning that awkward thing called reality spare us your tears
ANI being biased toward the BJP is a fairly well known criticism, but that is not what is being debated here. The focus of this thread is the clip itself. If you distrust ANI, feel free to verify the statement through any other source you consider credible. The burden of doing so is on you.

My comment was solely about highlighting the double standards that often characterize American foreign policy and why it is never wise to take Washington's rhetoric at face value. Trump's sweet words today can very easily turn into punitive measures tomorrow. History is filled with examples of the United States shifting its position when its strategic interests change.

I also fail to see where I was supposedly gloating about a "strong Indo-American partnership." The BJP and Modi have received plenty of criticism, both domestically and internationally. My point was much narrower that is shadow fleets operate in a legally grey area, while the United States continues to view itself as the enforcer of the international order. This is an entirely different debate.

That said, we live in a world where power often shapes outcomes. India is no exception to this reality. Like any major state pursuing its interests, it should and likely already does seek exemptions, accommodations, or alternative mechanisms to protect critical economic and strategic interests, including those connected to its shipping and energy security.
 
ANI being biased toward the BJP is a fairly well known criticism, but that is not what is being debated here. The focus of this thread is the clip itself. If you distrust ANI, feel free to verify the statement through any other source you consider credible. The burden of doing so is on you.

My comment was solely about highlighting the double standards that often characterize American foreign policy and why it is never wise to take Washington's rhetoric at face value. Trump's sweet words today can very easily turn into punitive measures tomorrow. History is filled with examples of the United States shifting its position when its strategic interests change.

I also fail to see where I was supposedly gloating about a "strong Indo-American partnership." The BJP and Modi have received plenty of criticism, both domestically and internationally. My point was much narrower that is shadow fleets operate in a legally grey area, while the United States continues to view itself as the enforcer of the international order. This is an entirely different debate.

That said, we live in a world where power often shapes outcomes. India is no exception to this reality. Like any major state pursuing its interests, it should and likely already does seek exemptions, accommodations, or alternative mechanisms to protect critical economic and strategic interests, including those connected to its shipping and energy security.

Enough said on this

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top