Yasser76
Elite Member
ANI being biased toward the BJP is a fairly well known criticism, but that is not what is being debated here. The focus of this thread is the clip itself. If you distrust ANI, feel free to verify the statement through any other source you consider credible. The burden of doing so is on you.
My comment was solely about highlighting the double standards that often characterize American foreign policy and why it is never wise to take Washington's rhetoric at face value. Trump's sweet words today can very easily turn into punitive measures tomorrow. History is filled with examples of the United States shifting its position when its strategic interests change.
I also fail to see where I was supposedly gloating about a "strong Indo-American partnership." The BJP and Modi have received plenty of criticism, both domestically and internationally. My point was much narrower that is shadow fleets operate in a legally grey area, while the United States continues to view itself as the enforcer of the international order. This is an entirely different debate.
That said, we live in a world where power often shapes outcomes. India is no exception to this reality. Like any major state pursuing its interests, it should and likely already does seek exemptions, accommodations, or alternative mechanisms to protect critical economic and strategic interests, including those connected to its shipping and energy security.
Enough said on this
#BadSources – How Indian news agency ANI quoted sources that do not exist - EU DisinfoLab
Bad Sources is our latest investigation into how Indian news agency ANI repeatedly quoted non-existent sources spreading anti-Pakistan/China narratives in India.
















