Remember, you were the first to bring any military hardware into the conversation, not me. You initiated the conversation by taking a shot at us for not being prepared for a possible military conflict with you guys, since we don't have any Su-57s. I countered your point regarding our readiness with my list of our equipment even when we don't have the Su57. You didn't like what I said, so you stated that we don't have any BVR capabilities. I simply bring up the fact that when we faced the world's premier air force in the 60's, we had zero BVR capability like we have now (R-27, R-77) and still achieved the greatest number of fighter aces that no other air force can even come up close when facing the American or even a mid-tier power. You brought up AEW and EW and acted like they were some Chinese inventions that we have never faced in actual combat. I simply stated the fact that AEW were deployed during aerial combat over the sky of North Viet Nam for sports to aid the American's "BVR" capabilities. You also brought up EW like some super Chinese invention. Mind you, I simply stated the fact that no country besides Viet Nam possesses the kind of knowledge, experience, and combat performance overcoming massive EW attacks to shoot down several thousand fixed-wing American jets including B-52 bombers. I simply give you facts, not chest thumping. You call someone not suitable to talk about defense-related matters, while you possess zero knowledge about the history of BVR fight, AEW, EW and you think this kind of stuff is brand new but sorry to burst your bubble, you're talking to a country that has the most combat experience and effectiveness in these fields and the catch of all is going up against a superpower air force. You top it off by comparing the U.S to Cuba like China is with Viet Nam in term of military disparity; you're not on the level of the U.S and Viet Nam is not on the level of Cuba; it's just a simple fact that you don't grasp and still having the audacity to call someone not eligible to talk about defense-related subjects