America has lost its war with Iran
It was never likely that the Islamic Republic of Iran would gift
Donald Trump a
peace agreement, even a measly one, for his
80th birthday, something he could immediately proclaim after the “historic”
cage fight on the south lawn of the White House. However, having falsely declared 39 times since he went to war with Iran in February that
peace was at hand, this time might really be different.
If the Pakistani authorities brokering the deal, the Iranians and the Americans all say that the
“memorandum of understanding” (MoU) will indeed be signed by the end of the week, then there is, at last, some cause for realistic optimism.
However, caution remains – because the indications are that the as-yet unpublished and (curiously) unleaked MoU will settle comparatively little. It will, in essence, be an undertaking to talk about some future, more durable agreement. If recent history is anything to go by, the obstacles to that will remain formidable. MoU or not, an unstable region has been rendered even more dangerous by the unforced war of choice launched by
Israel and America. The world will be coping with its repercussions for months, if not years.
Not the least of those is the
economic impact. It is vast, extending far beyond the
physical destruction and the price of
petrol to a global loss of output and lower economic growth that threatened an international recession and financial crash. National treasuries, companies and households everywhere have come under pressure, and the poorest have suffered most.
That squeeze should now recede, as oil, natural gas, raw materials, pharmaceuticals and other supplies resume their traffic. The Strait of Hormuz should soon reopen to shipping, with or without some form of Iranian supervision or
tolling – and that alone is worth celebrating, as witnessed in the reaction of financial markets, and even if it will take some time for commerce to return to normal.
The most serious obstacle to a more lasting peace remains Benjamin Netanyahu. In his zero-sum world view, a weaker Iran is necessarily a safer Israel, and that is why he encouraged – or persuaded – the Trump administration to launch
Operation Epic Fury, just as he did in getting Operation Midnight Hammer underway a year ago.
To the now obvious irritation of the US president, Mr Netanyahu is continuing his invasion and occupation of southern Lebanon, designed to neutralise Hezbollah, as well as apparently permitting more illegal Israeli settlements on the West Bank, even as Mr Trump wants out.
The president seems not to be able to stop his troublesome friend and ally from going on and on with his military operations, but he shouldn’t be surprised. Mr Netanyahu sees a nuclear-armed Iran as an existential threat to (nuclear-armed) Israel, and, as such, it will require maximum pressure from the White House to prevent him from continually trying to scupper the MoU and a permanent ceasefire.
A second, related roadblock to peace lies in the US Senate, which has still to approve the Iran MoU, under a law passed, ironically, when Republicans were concerned about the Iran nuclear deal negotiated in 2015 by the Barack Obama administration.
Editorial: If the ceasefire holds, Donald Trump’s ill-starred foray into the Middle East will have left the Iranian regime stronger than it was before the conflict
www.independent.co.uk
