BrahMos: Greek Experts Pitch Indo-Russian Supersonic Cruise Missile To Checkmate S-400 Armed Turkey

I'm sorry but Brahmos hit is your destiny....

Turkish Navy has over 250+ ESSM Missiles ( with speed of mach4+ ) to intercept supersonic Missiles like BRAHMOS ( mach 2,9 )

1783463478057.png

on the other hand , Indian , Greek , French , Israeli Warships can not intercept TAYFUN Block-3 hypersonic anti-ship Ballistic Missile ( speed of mach5+ in therminal phase )
 
Turkish Navy has over 250+ ESSM Missiles ( with speed of mach4+ ) to intercept supersonic Missiles like BRAHMOS ( mach 2,9 )

View attachment 205136

on the other hand , Indian , Greek , French , Israeli Warships can not intercept TAYFUN Block-3 hypersonic anti-ship Ballistic Missile ( speed of mach5+ in therminal phase )
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



India builds 500 brahmos EVERY YEAR
 
Right... so let me get this straight: The Greeks want to buy the old 1950/60's Soviet tech based system to counter the 2000/2010s Russian tech based systems?
 
Turkish Navy has over 250+ ESSM Missiles ( with speed of mach4+ ) to intercept supersonic Missiles like BRAHMOS ( mach 2,9 )

View attachment 205136

on the other hand , Indian , Greek , French , Israeli Warships can not intercept TAYFUN Block-3 hypersonic anti-ship Ballistic Missile ( speed of mach5+ in therminal phase )
I think Barak should be able to stop Tayfun as it had proven this by shooting down Iskandar missile....
 
India builds 500 brahmos EVERY YEAR
That is the installed capacity, not production volume.
I think Barak should be able to stop Tayfun as it had proven this by shooting down Iskandar missile....
Tayfun is upgraded from the old Chinese B-611 they have been license producing.
1783480043714.png
 
I think Barak should be able to stop Tayfun as it had proven this by shooting down Iskandar missile....
How? Can you prove me that your barak even able to intercept supersonic missiles let alone hypersonic missiles, look dude all major powers have been specifcally designed and developed point or short range anti- missile systems to intercept All supersonic anti-ship missiles ( Barak is medium range SAM) like ESSM ( evolved sea sparrow) RIM-116 RAM (rolling airframe missiles), Russians had their on versions of improved KUB series on their ships, China has HHQ-10 and FL-3000 comparable to US ESSM and RIM-116, UK has CAMM/CAMM-ER based on ASRAAM, French IR MICA based system

All these point anti-missile systems are based on IIR ( imaging Infrared guidance system) which is much more reliable than semi-active and active radar guidance of your Barak system

and all supersonic missiles is not major concern for USN and other major navies because their they huge RCS (radar cross section) and Infrared signature and all super sonic missiles is not true sea skimming/terrain following missiles because they cruises 10 of meters above the sea/land compare to their subsonic cousins which able to cruises 3-4 meters/ land, only advantage is for all supersonic anti-ship missiles is their reaction time compare to subsonic one but this weakness of the target can easily be removed by applying MULTIPLE COOUNTERMEASURE against supersonic anti-ship missiles like like EW/Chaff and flares short range anti-missile systems and for the last resort target ship has CIWS (close-in weapon system)

USN and other major navies of the world are more concern against hybrid anti-ship missiles like YJ-18/YJ-83 and variants of Russian SS-N-Sizzler series which both qualities of subsonic/supersonic anti-ship missiles, In cruise phase they subsonic sea skimming mode (and much much more stealthier than all supersonic anti-ship missiles during cruise phase ((hence detected enemy radars and IR sensors much much earlier than subsonic one))) and terminal supersonic dash (less reaction time) So all supersonic anti-ship missiles are not remains at least for world's major navies as they were consider a major threats for western navies at height of cold war

AND LAST SHOW ME THE PROVE (VIDEOS/CLIPS) FROM ANYWHERE ON THE WEB THAT YOUR BARAK IS ABLETO INTERCEPT EVEN SUPERSONIC TARGETS LET ALONE HYPERSONIC ONES LOL
 
How? Can you prove me that your barak even able to intercept supersonic missiles let alone hypersonic missiles, look dude all major powers have been specifcally designed and developed point or short range anti- missile systems to intercept All supersonic anti-ship missiles ( Barak is medium range SAM) like ESSM ( evolved sea sparrow) RIM-116 RAM (rolling airframe missiles), Russians had their on versions of improved KUB series on their ships, China has HHQ-10 and FL-3000 comparable to US ESSM and RIM-116, UK has CAMM/CAMM-ER based on ASRAAM, French IR MICA based system

All these point anti-missile systems are based on IIR ( imaging Infrared guidance system) which is much more reliable than semi-active and active radar guidance of your Barak system

and all supersonic missiles is not major concern for USN and other major navies because their they huge RCS (radar cross section) and Infrared signature and all super sonic missiles is not true sea skimming/terrain following missiles because they cruises 10 of meters above the sea/land compare to their subsonic cousins which able to cruises 3-4 meters/ land, only advantage is for all supersonic anti-ship missiles is their reaction time compare to subsonic one but this weakness of the target can easily be removed by applying MULTIPLE COOUNTERMEASURE against supersonic anti-ship missiles like like EW/Chaff and flares short range anti-missile systems and for the last resort target ship has CIWS (close-in weapon system)

USN and other major navies of the world are more concern against hybrid anti-ship missiles like YJ-18/YJ-83 and variants of Russian SS-N-Sizzler series which both qualities of subsonic/supersonic anti-ship missiles, In cruise phase they subsonic sea skimming mode (and much much more stealthier than all supersonic anti-ship missiles during cruise phase ((hence detected enemy radars and IR sensors much much earlier than subsonic one))) and terminal supersonic dash (less reaction time) So all supersonic anti-ship missiles are not remains at least for world's major navies as they were consider a major threats for western navies at height of cold war

AND LAST SHOW ME THE PROVE (VIDEOS/CLIPS) FROM ANYWHERE ON THE WEB THAT YOUR BARAK IS ABLETO INTERCEPT EVEN SUPERSONIC TARGETS LET ALONE HYPERSONIC ONES LOL
I had come across an article last year when barak had destroyed hypersonic Iskandar bur unable to find out it... but believe me Barak has scored kill over Iskandar...
 
I had come across an article last year when barak had destroyed hypersonic Iskandar bur unable to find out it... but believe me Barak has scored kill over Iskandar...
Iskandar is not a hypersonic missile at all its warhead slows down below MACH -5 (hypersonic speed) during/after reentry lol
 
Tayfun is upgraded from the old Chinese B-611 they have been license producing.
View attachment 205148

No, it isn't. It's Bora/Khan that was upgraded version of B611.

Tayfun is a new design by all metrics. It's such a light missile (block 1) with only 2300kg weight. Yet carries 1000lbf warhead at maximum 800km range in full ballistic trajectory. B611 had a maximum range of 350-400km. That is some highly advanced indigenous propulsion tech that Roketsan has developed. Also composite airframe compared to original steel frame of B611/Bora. +High precision guidance electronics. Original B611 did not had 5-10 meter CEP.
 
Last edited:
I had come across an article last year when barak had destroyed hypersonic Iskandar bur unable to find out it... but believe me Barak has scored kill over Iskandar...
Do you know what meaning of hypersonic in the atmosphere? MACH-5 and above, And Iskander is short range ballistic missiles hasn't any momentum/kinetic energy (thrust) to its warhead to travel hypersonic speed within the atmosphere
 
No, it isn't. It's Bora/Khan that was updated version of B611.

Tayfun is a new design by all metrics. It's such a light missile (block 1) with only 2300 weight. Yet carries 1000lbf warhead at maximum 800km range in full ballistic trajectory. B611 had a maximum range of 350-400km. That is some highly advanced indigenous propulsion tech that Roketsan has developed. +high precision guidance electronics. Original B611 did not had 5-10 meter CEP.
The missile has a common ancestor, that is B-611. Yes Turks have modified, upgraded and certified a much more modern system but aerodynamic design is still largely unchanged.
 
Do you know what meaning of hypersonic in the atmosphere? MACH-5 and above, And Iskander is short range ballistic missiles hasn't any momentum/kinetic energy (thrust) to its warhead to travel hypersonic speed within the atmosphere

No, it reaches around Mach 7 after motor burnout inside the atmosphere.
 
No, it reaches around Mach 7 after motor burnout inside the atmosphere.
where do you get it sir, I didn't find any link/ source to prove it, I would be thankful if you give a me link/source of his sir, thanks in advance
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top