Reimagining Pakistan's Federation: Why Smaller Units Keep Pakistan Strong: YLH

SoulSpokesman

Trusted Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2023
Messages
4,488
Reaction score
3,955
Reputation
847.6
Country of Origin
Country of Residence

About 16 years ago, writing in another newspaper, I proposed the idea of 20 geographic provinces for Pakistan. I have since reconsidered my position and it has to do with having read the Lahore Resolution in its true spirit as a foundational constitutional document for Pakistan. What the Lahore Resolution does is to establish the blueprint for a federation in which provinces are autonomous and sovereign, meaning that they are more than mere provinces but countries akin to Great Britain’s four constituent countries, England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Just as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland cannot be carved up into smaller provinces, so can’t Sindh, Balochistan, Punjab and KPK without renouncing the Lahore Resolution and doing that I strongly caution against.

To put it simply Sindh, Balochistan, West Punjab, KPK (then NWFP) along with East Bengal created the Pakistani federation in 1947 and not the other way around. The very acronym Pakistan is ultimately derived from and a recognition of this basic reality. Secondly suppose Punjab divides itself, which it will, and smaller provinces don’t, that would mean that erstwhile Punjab’s representation in the Senate would go up thus further entrenching the Punjabi majority in the country. So there is no scenario where smaller provinces win short of smaller provinces insisting on dividing themselves and resisting Punjab’s division, which is fait accompli at this point. So this is an explosive idea and the Indian example is not an adequate example, because unlike India, residuary powers vest in provinces in Pakistan.

That said there is actual need for administrative units beyond mere Divisions/Districts/Tehsils etc and we have to some how find a solution that creates new administrative units while retaining the constituent units of the Federation. Fortunately, the history of the subcontinent readily provides the perfect solution i.e. The very horizontal Indus Valley Civilisation as well as the Cabinet Mission Plan of 1946 which could have saved the British fiction of united India had it been given a chance by the Congress leaders. Of course, it has to be tailored to Pakistani conditions and reality, namely that there can be no reconsideration or opt out clause after 10 years i.e. So the Cabinet Mission Plan without the right of secession.

One of the anxieties of the Congress’s centralising leaders was that the Federation would only have powers limited to defence, foreign affairs and communications with the power to tax. Now don’t be fooled by the long Federal Legislative List in the Pakistani constitution but all items on the Federal Legislative List can neatly fit into defence, foreign affairs, currency, major infrastructure and federal taxes. Therefore we already have a watered down federation. Hence this anxiety does not apply to Islamabad, Pakistan’s majority politicians and even to the power establishment. So what would a Cabinet Mission Plan like solution look like for Pakistan?

Sitting atop the structure could be the Union of Pakistan with a National Assembly directly elected on the principle of one man one vote and a Senate with equal representation for all constituent units as is presently the case. There is no need to undo the Federal Legislative List and the powers of the center. Next divide existing provinces into smaller units i.e. Northern Punjab, Central Punjab, Southern Punjab, Upper Sindh, Lower Sindh and Southern Sindh, and so on and so forth for Balochistan and KPK. These smaller units can then be reorganised into four constituent Republics (Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and KPK) with the present provincial assemblies retaining the provincial legislative lists and residuary powers. The new provincial Republics would deem to have acceded to the Union of Pakistan and the Federal/Union legislature/parliament the five broad heads mentioned above i.e.

Essentially the powers that the current parliament has. Whether the Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and KPK want to be Islamic Republics, People’s Republics, or simply Republics should be left up to them. It is not unprecedented – the Russian Federation contains 21 Republics each with its own anthem and language and yet Russia is a united country. I, therefore, propose a three tiered Union of Pakistan with four republics (Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and KPK) further subdivided into three or four provinces with no right of secession for any of the Republics or their provinces and present constitutional structure of Pakistan largely in place. The issue here is a psychological one and not a geographic or physical one. What has kept Pakistan together so far is neither Islam nor nomenclature but the Pakistan’s Armed Forces and the primordial existence of this region as a horizontal civilisation. I propose to recreate that horizontal civilisation.

It is now time to have a more organic union which complements the sword arm of the country. It is a nuclear state and changing the nomenclature would not dissolve it. A change in nomenclature would however recognise the diversity of the Pakistani people and bring national cohesion, once the primordial ethnic identities of Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan and KPK have homelands to call their own. It also clears the way for Republics of Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir to join the Union of Pakistan as its fifth and sixth constituent units. Such a solution would fully meet the promise of the Lahore Resolution of having constituent units that are autonomous and sovereign. Russia and Great Britain are the obvious examples that I have cited above.

Curiously in the Jinnah Papers, there is a document sent to Mr Jinnah by left leaning Muslim Leaguer which purports to be the constitution of Union of Islamic Socialist Republics of Pakistan. The visionary that he was, Chaudhry Rehmat Ali had imagined Pakistan as a conglomerate of Muslim states. Future Pakistan can be that – a Federal Union of Republics which seeks its inspiration from the Indus Valley Civilisation which was horizontal not vertical, Rehmat Ali’s original idea, the Lahore Resolution, the Cabinet Mission Plan which Jinnah accepted, the United Kingdom (and mind you Great Britain’s constituent countries have the right to secession which I propose should not exist in this proposed Union of Pakistan) and the Russian Federation. Such a Pakistan would be organic and flexible, cognisant of its multicultural and multiethnic diversity ending once and for all the ethnic strife that has become so commonplace in Pakistan. Pakistan’s powerful armed forces and the nuclear umbrella would ensure that flexible as the Union is, it would also be unbreakable and a united whole.

Regards

PS: The author Mr Yasser Latif Hamdani is a dear friend and my Qaid and I am his Sole Spokesman

@Meengla @M. Sarmad @peagle @Master Chief @Owaiz @r3alist
 
Source:
The Friday Times
Pakistan Armed Forces have already failed multiple times in keeping the country and its citizens safe. The most glaring failure was 1971 and East Pakistan. Another huge failure is the tens of thousands of civilians killed and gigantic economic and social damage inflicted by foreign sponsored terrorists in the last 30 years.

I think this is a nonsense army-centric article. All that needs to be done is implementing the 1971 Constitution in letter and spirit.
 
If smaller unit are better than why is Punjab performing better than all the other provinces?
China, India have large provinces who are doing a much better Job than any province in Pakistan?
California, Texas,NYS etc are doing a much better job than a smaller Nebraska or something because big cities bring revenue for smaller cities and towns.

So I think it's a flawed logic but ik why they are doing that

It's not about South Punjab, North Balochistan, hazara or any other province
They're kinda irrelevant in some ways

What they really want is for Karachi to be normal again and not be a shit hole it is rn under PPP so we can get more cash flow flowing in for the federal government.
But you can't do that without upsetting sindh so now they have to do this whole game of let's break down all the provinces into smaller provinces so we can get a new Karachi province.

I would much rather them switch to a presidential system than do whatever this is
I don't think it'll be all THAT beneficial

But with presidential system even in a perfect democracy power would concentrate further in Punjab whichll lead to resentment in other provinces more so than in a very divided, slow and convoluted parliamentary system.
You can do Senate and stuff but it's not a perfect system.
 
Pakistan Armed Forces have already failed multiple times in keeping the country and its citizens safe. The most glaring failure was 1971 and East Pakistan. Another huge failure is the tens of thousands of civilians killed and gigantic economic and social damage inflicted by foreign sponsored terrorists in the last 30 years.

I think this is a nonsense army-centric article. All that needs to be done is implementing the 1971 Constitution in letter and spirit.
East/West Pakistan was a stupid idea to begin with. Bangladesh should have been created in 1947 alongside the rest.
 
East/West Pakistan was a stupid idea to begin with. Bangladesh should have been created in 1947 alongside the rest.
Agree on that. However people forget that the British under Atlee were in a rush to quit their colonial entity before the next general election that could have brought imperialist Conservatives back to power.

It still does not absolve the armed forces from what happened in East Pakistan.

This article has fauji written all over it and would not pass muster from a true lawyer or constitutionalist standpoint. It reflects the flawed fauji view where army is the center of everything and all other subjects are a joke.

I suspect Mr Hamdani merely lent his name to it in exchange for cash.
 
Last edited:
Agree on that. However people forget that the British under Atlee were in a rush to quit their colonial entity before the next British general election that could have brought imperialist Conservatives back to power.

It still does not absolve the armed forces from what happened in East Pakistan.
True, but if people had the common sense, instead of trying to make the mistake of the British to work by force, they could have amicably agreed to separate soon after 1947.
 
True, but if people had the common sense, instead of trying to make the mistake of the British to work by force, they could have amicably agreed to separate soon after 1947.
You mean East and West Pakistan on their own agree to separate after 1947 ? Sir I think that is very remote possibility and would have encouraged further separatism in the new countries.

Actually if the Constiution had been followed back then and the Bengalis respected, matters would have been worked out. But we were subjected to endless bureaucratic and fauji coups and meddling which ruined us and has continued to ruin us to this day.
 
local self govrment and ulits funding directly in their account instead of provincial interferance is the way to go.
 
You mean East and West Pakistan on their own agree to separate after 1947 ? Sir I think that is very remote possibility and would have encouraged further separatism in the new countries.

Actually if the Constiution had been followed back then and the Bengalis respected, matters would have been worked out. But we were subjected to endless bureaucratic and fauji coups and meddling which ruined us and has continued to ruin us to this day.
Oh really, and forcing two populaces, separated by thousands of miles of a belligerent india in between, with different languages, culture etc, didn't encourage separatism? The whole concept of East/West Pakistan was deeply flawed to begin with.
 
Oh really, and forcing two populaces, separated by thousands of miles of a belligerent india in between, with different languages, culture etc, didn't encourage separatism? The whole concept of East/West Pakistan was deeply flawed to begin with.
You can use that logic against what is today's Pakistan as well, very different ethnicities and languages thrown together in a country bordered by hostile states on both sides.

East / West Pakistan would still have worked if a very different direction were taken. By that I mean settling the Kashmir dispute with India early on and then committing to resolving all tensions and challenges between the two wings via politics and law, under civilian leadership.

The faujis and bureaucrats who seized power proved incapable of any of this and hence we are given this copium of "well East and West Pakistan would have never worked anyway".
 
Army is itself highly hierarchical, and CDF doesn't want to share its power with lower ranks, but GHQ wants provinces to be decentralised.

I also want small units like provinces (feasible or not, but not economical), but preferably local body-based units.
 
To put it simply Sindh, Balochistan, West Punjab, KPK (then NWFP) along with East Bengal created the Pakistani federation in 1947 and not the other way around.

He start of very badly here. SIndh and Punjab existed but Balochistan and KPK are creation of Pakistan.
 
The deranged author should elaborate what it means as horizontal or very horizontal and vertical civilisations? It seems the author is intellectually challenged and conditioned to colonial bigotry.
 
You can use that logic against what is today's Pakistan as well, very different ethnicities and languages thrown together in a country bordered by hostile states on both sides.

East / West Pakistan would still have worked if a very different direction were taken. By that I mean settling the Kashmir dispute with India early on and then committing to resolving all tensions and challenges between the two wings via politics and law, under civilian leadership.

The faujis and bureaucrats who seized power proved incapable of any of this and hence we are given this copium of "well East and West Pakistan would have never worked anyway".
Not entirely true, the people of "west" Pakistan as we know it today have coexisted for hundreds of years, regardless of ethnicity or language, and regardless of whether it was the British Raj or the mugals, so there's already a sense of cohesion. But with East/West Pakistan you're effectively asking people living thousands of miles away on the other side of india to feel affinity with the West, it's completely bonkers. Name me an example of where such a country exists today? Or has everyone worked in the past?
 
@Watandar sb

I think this is a nonsense army-centric article.

It is true that my dear friend and Qaid Yasser Pai tends to support military a little bit esp if the COAS is of a secular and non sectarian disposition- he has made no bones of his support for both Mushy and now Munir. But his support stems from his dream of seeing a secular, inclusive Pakistan rather than support of dictatorship per se. His hypothesis is that when you have untrammeled democracy, demagoguing politicians tend to resort to religious/sectarian polarisation.

Regards
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top