_Arabia_
Trusted Member
More nonsense from the clown.1- I never claimed Salah el din to be Egyptian ( I said he was MUSLIM KURD) who had nothing to do with saudia or gcc or ur gulf
2- Fatimids are non-arabs of persian -north african and probably jew roots , they had nothing to do with your arabia.
that quote from abbasid dynasty (Abbasid Manifesto)
3- stop claiming everything as arab , you are embarrassing yourself , you people claim everything as arab Egypt-Tunisia-Andalus-Kurds- etc , what's next ? Norway was arab?
you destroy the image of arabs here on forum.
He was not a Kurd but an Arab as most contemporary sources claimed (I already posted them) and which his own family also claimed. His descendants (Al-Ayyoubi family) are also fully Arab today and mainly live in KSA and Jordan.
There was nothing Kurdish about him other than his original Arab tribe being partially Kurdified by intermarrying with Kurds (back then it meant nomads).
There was no concept of Kurds back then even. Already provided MODERN sources that claim the same.
Try again, they were an Hashemite (ALID) dynasty originally from Hejaz (KSA) and proudly claimed so as well and they pioneered Arab Muslim culture.
Fatimid Caliphate - Wikipedia
Britannica:
Their own Ismaili organizations state the same thing.
Fatimids
The Fatimid Caliphate
The Fatimid Caliphate also known as the Fatimid Empire, was a caliphate extant from the tenth to the twelfth centuries CE under the rule of the Fatimids, an Isma'ili Shi'a dynasty. The Fatimids traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Muhammad's daughter Fatima and her husband Ali, the first...
www.history.org.uk
Next you will claim that Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid and 100's of other Arab dynasties in Asia, Africa and Europe were non-Arabs and maybe even that Prophet Muhammad (saws) was not an Arab or 99% of all the Sahaba?
More hallucinations. We do not need to nor do we claim non-Arab history.
Let me repost this obvious fact:
I am the only one in this thread that has posted extensive sources that confirm Saladin's origins. With direct writings from contemporary books. Both contemporary sources and later sources and modern sources.
You can claim him to be Kurd, Turk, Martian etc. he was FULLY ARABIZED, his family proudly claimed Arab heritage, his name was Arab, most of that of his family, his modern-day descendants are today Arabs and his dynasty used Arabic as the official language, Arabic titles (Sultan), Arab architecture, Arab state institutions modeled on past Arab caliphates. In short he promoted (proudly) ARAB MUSLIM CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION. NOTHING KURDISH (WHICH BARELY EXISTED BACK THEN AND MEANT NOMAD) OR TURKIC ABOUT HIM AND HIS DYNASTY. Moreover he was born on Arab soil and died on Arab soil too. Nothing more to discuss.
Last edited:





