Is China encroaching upon Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh?

[Beijingwalker]

If Pakistan and China genuinely want a peaceful solution, then Pakistan can give up the areas of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan under its control, while China can withdraw from Aksai Chin. The issue would be solved.

lol, that's India's "peaceful solution" to solve border issues with China and Pakistan? You can forever live in your fantasy world.

 

[Beijingwalker]

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

The problem with the patients having mental disorder is that they themselves don't understand they are sick! Somebody else needs to take them to doctors....

Bharat has mental disorders....

 

[Feroze]

China never accepted South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh as being part of India.

Historical maps prove this. It is the arrogance of the Indian government which is the problem.

 

[El Sidd]

When I saw your remarks, I knew that arrogant Indians wouldn't accept peaceful negotiations. China has tried many times to negotiate peace with India, and every time India tore up the agreement.

People who stay away from war will only love war more. I hope this Indian takes part in a war, so he can understand the meaning of war.

Indians are the only people threatened by peace.

If Pakistan and China genuinely want a peaceful solution, then Pakistan can give up the areas of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan under its control, while China can withdraw from Aksai Chin. The issue would be solved.

You keep portraying Pakistan and China as if they are the only countries genuinely interested in peace, but I would like to see that commitment reflected in reality—not just in words.

If we look at the historical facts, the Kashmir conflict began in 1947 when Pakistan-backed forces attempted to take control of the independent Jammu and Kashmir. Later, China also took control of Aksai Chin and useless claims for other parts of India. Yet you are saying, indian gets pleasure with this conflicts

If we are going to discuss peace and a solution, then we should look at the actions and responsibilities of all sides, not portray India as the only culprit

The commitment to solve any dispute peacefully and in a just manner is not just Sino-Pak monopoly, every nation of the world wants that apart from Indians it seems.

Yes, only India wants conflict because she wants to impose her will upon the disputing parties.

There are minimal Pakistani forces necessary to maintain order in Kashmir unlike the million or so troops, forced demographic changes and 5th World communal violence.

There's no goodwill anywhere near an Indian policymakers dictionary when it comes to territorial disputes.

 

[Musings]

China has problem with almost every neighbours, so look at yourself first.

You have disputes from lands to Marine borders, nothing left.. surprised word for me - so called peaceful neighbour...

Frankly, God save us from such so called peaceful neighbour. We don't want it

Thats an embarrassing post. India is the nation that isnt in peace with itself let alone its neighbours. Please educate yourself before posting something like this.

 

[Feroze]

Thats an embarrassing post. India is the nation that isnt in peace with itself let alone its neighbours. Please educate yourself before posting something like this.

Exactly correct. Comparing India to China is even ridiculous. India is not even on par with China on many human indicators. India may have the world's largest population.

BUT India is far behind China in manufacturing, technology, standard of living.

India has hundreds of millions of poor people.

 

[ety]

If Pakistan and China genuinely want a peaceful solution, then Pakistan can give up the areas of Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan under its control, while China can withdraw from Aksai Chin. The issue would be solved.

Lol, that's your Indian logic eh ? Your idea of peace is for other countries to give up their lands to appease your greedy India and then we will have peace and problems solved, lol. Keep day dreaming.

 

[ety]

LOl, so delusional an Indian

China has 14 neighbors and enjoys cordial and peaceful borders with 13 of them. India is the only country which has a hostile and murderous border with China.

China has a long land border and has 14 neighboring countries in total : Afghanistan, Bhutan, India, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Vietnam.

India is the country which indeed has disputes with every neighbor.

These Indians keep perpetuating the lies that China has border problems with all its neighbors. That's disgusting.

 

[东风夜放花千树]

China has problem with almost every neighbours, so look at yourself first.

You have disputes from lands to Marine borders, nothing left.. surprised word for me - so called peaceful neighbour...

Frankly, God save us from such so called peaceful neighbour. We don't want it

China is a mirror; some countries always slander China by the inhumane things they have done.

The United States accuses China of forced labor in Xinjiang. (Large numbers of Black slaves on American cotton plantations)

The United States and Europe accuse China of economic colonization in Africa. (To date, the U.S. controls Japan economically and militarily controls South Korea and Japan, with 750 military bases deployed in more than 80 countries.) The wave of colonization in European countries has brought heavy disaster to the peoples of Asia, Africa, and Latin America)

India accused China of having a caste system. (India still has a caste system)

Now India accuses China of poor relations with its neighbors. What about India's annexation of Sikkim in 1975? What about India's repeated invasions of Pakistan? What do you say about India's repeated invasions of China? What does India say about its attempt to seize Nepal's Karapani region? What do the Maldives and Tajikistan say about the expulsion of Indian troops?

Deliberately ignoring facts and fabricating false lies has always been India's practice. Russia, the United States, Iran, and Ukraine have all attacked Indian cargo ships; these four are all India's so-called "friends."

If you don't want to be neighbors with China, hurry and move to other Western countries. Another thing Indians excel at is forging documents to enter the country, disrupting the lives and environment of other countries, and then occupying those areas. Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom all have large numbers of Indian immigrants.

Another issue is that Indian media accuse China of being unfriendly to Indians. To make this lie true, we are cracking down on Indians who stay and work illegally, boycotting companies that serve Indians.

Indians killed Chinese soldiers, repeatedly fabricated lies to insult China, rejected options for peace negotiations, and attempted to occupy Chinese territory. India is not qualified to receive the friendliness of the Chinese.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

LOl, so delusional an Indian

China has 14 neighbors and enjoys cordial and peaceful borders with 13 of them. India is the only country which has a hostile and murderous border with China.

China has a long land border and has 14 neighboring countries in total : Afghanistan, Bhutan, India, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Pakistan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Vietnam.

India is the country which indeed has disputes with every neighbor.

Neighbour and disputes
Main disputed area
India
Land
Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh
Bhutan
Land
Several areas along the Bhutan–China border
Japan
Maritime/islands
Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands
Philippines
Maritime/islands
Scarborough Shoal, Spratly Islands
Vietnam
Maritime/islands
Paracel & Spratly Islands
Malaysia
Maritime
Spratly Islands/South China Sea
Brunei
Maritime
South China Sea
Indonesia
Maritime/EEZ
South China Sea/Natuna area
Taiwan
Territorial/political
Taiwan and surrounding islands

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

lol, that's India's "peaceful solution" to solve border issues with China and Pakistan? You can forever live in your fantasy world.

After China’s attack on India in 1962, followed by the Pakistan attacked in 1965, the idea of peace was vanished in South Asia. India did not initiate these conflicts, but the region has remained caught in a cycle of disputes, mistrust, and military tensions.

Anyway, political claims, domestic politics, and vote-bank considerations continue to be major reasons why these issues remain unresolved today.

The simple and practical solution is to accept the existing boundaries as international borders by all three parties and abandon unrealistic territorial claims. No country in the region has the power or the willingness to achieve its maximal territorial ambitions without risking enormous destruction, especially if a full-scale war were to break out and any initiative war for getting claim parts will auto get converted to full war, just for reminder - capitals of all three nations, within the nuke rangeS

However, after decades of selling unrealistic hopes to their own populations, combined with concerns about international image, strategic interests, and domestic politics, the china, Pakistan and India involved are likely to continue keeping the region unstable—even though they understand that realistically, none of them is going to gain the territory.

 

[ety]

After China’s attack on India in 1962, followed by the Pakistan attacked in 1965, the idea of peace was vanished in South Asia. India did not initiate these conflicts, but the region has remained caught in a cycle of disputes, mistrust, and military tensions.

Yeah, keep lying, that's what you people are good for.

 

[Beijingwalker]

After China’s attack on India in 1962, followed by the Pakistan attacked in 1965, the idea of peace was vanished in South Asia. India did not initiate these conflicts, but the region has remained caught in a cycle of disputes, mistrust, and military tensions.

Anyway, political claims, domestic politics, and vote-bank considerations continue to be major reasons why these issues remain unresolved today.

The simple and practical solution is to accept the existing boundaries as international borders by all three parties and abandon unrealistic territorial claims. No country in the region has the power or the willingness to achieve its maximal territorial ambitions without risking enormous destruction, especially if a full-scale war were to break out and any initiative war for getting claim parts will auto get converted to full war, just for reminder - capitals of all three nations, within the nuke rangeS

However, after decades of selling unrealistic hopes to their own populations, combined with concerns about international image, strategic interests, and domestic politics, the china, Pakistan and India involved are likely to continue keeping the region unstable—even though they understand that realistically, none of them is going to gain the territory.

How many more lies are you going to make, the whole conflict boiled down to your so call "Forward Policy". You expect that Indian troop move all the way up north to Beijing and Chinese army just stand by and watch?


" It involved setting up military outposts behind Chinese positions, with 43 such posts positioned north of the disputed McMahon Line, which China did not recognize."

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

How many more lies are you going to make, the whole conflict boiled down to your so call "Forward Policy". You expect that Indian troop move all the way up north to Beijing and Chinese army just stand by and watch?


" It involved setting up military outposts behind Chinese positions, with 43 such posts positioned north of the disputed McMahon Line, which China did not recognize."

I don't want agruree here but one question?

What yout think about useless claims by all three nations by today? Since we all known, it cannot be achieved without very bloody war and practically no one is willing today.

Will this going to hellp anyone?